<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/10146/Poll_Name_the_New_XFce_File_Manager</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:39:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>names...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Pathfinder&quot; it should not be because there is already another one with that name in the Mac platform.<br />
&quot;Vagabond&quot; is the name of a WAP browser.<br />
&quot;Nomad&quot; might have problems with Creative.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Missing Option....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Karl. Because I like the name.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Better options...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Names I think would work are more like TrapperKeeper, xffm and Watcher.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Name Game</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Bobby Fisher... get it?? searching for!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xffm come one </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>All of the XFCE stuff has simple straight forward names.  Start breaking that tradition and the flood gates to nonsense names are going to be open.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: xffm come one</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Xffm is still going to be in XFCE 4.4.  This is a NEW, different, secondary FM, aiming to be much simpler and basic.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XF-Filer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XF-Filer, like ROX-Filer. All these names suggest that XFCE lacks recognizable identity. They should change the name of the whole project into XFDE (XF Desktop Environment) and stick to the XF prefix.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Clerk</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I chose &quot;Clerk&quot;, although I think &quot;File Clerk&quot; would be better. With a new file manager, XFCE will be truly awesome.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How about...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XINN<br />
<br />
XINN Is Not Nautilus<br />
<br />
where X := {A..Z} - {G,K}<br />
<br />
:)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How abour Zen</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thunar? Hmmm... I thought that was it's name?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>This is just stupid! Benny, Thunar works just fine and fits it perfectly... keep it! <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XF-iles or  XFiles or XF-iler or  XFiler </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I know that someone already suggested XF-Filer but I feel that <br />
my suggestions are more pronounceable.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too many options</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>To have a decent poll you really need to minimize the number of options you present.  There is just far too many to choose from.<br />
<br />
I'm with Bannor99, 'XFiler' sounds decent.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>FxcK???</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>??</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>file manager - xfce file manager</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I voted &quot;suck&quot; cause there was no &quot;xfce file manager&quot; option, and all others, well suck</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I tried suggesting &quot;File Forager&quot; or simply &quot;Forager&quot; on the mailing list, but not being a subscriber, it doesn't look like the mail got through <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" />   I thought it'd be good to use the rodent imagery <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" />   Think a fieldmouse gathering grain.<br />
<br />
Other than that, I like the XINN idea <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>They should...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Name it Trufflehunter. The Narnia movies are coming out in a bit, and they'll get free publicity that way! Plus it makes sense for an organizer/finder app.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: How about...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;XINN Is Not Nautilus<br />
<br />
where X := {A..Z} - {G,K}&quot;<br />
<br />
I like it!<br />
<br />
Im partial to FINN myself. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFiler</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>My vote for XFiler.  Most SciFi coolness.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Handler or Scout</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I think they're the best by far, Handler just has a ring to it, I can't explain..</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>DIGGER</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Digger&quot; has a slightly obscene ring to it. I like it. Bonus: imagine the possibilities when thinking of mascots!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>path finder</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>pathfinder is good. I like it</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How about....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>..XeFraM<br />
<br />
Pronounced &quot;Zefram&quot;.  Wait, my Trek node is showing... <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>DIGGLER</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hmmm... I like it even better. Name it Diggler. Dirk for short.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>PathFinder already exists</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>PathFinder already exists, it is the file manager made by Jeroen van der Zijp using his FOX toolkit.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xfiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>They should call it the xfiles.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Honcho</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How about &quot;Honcho&quot;, as in &quot;Head Honcho&quot;?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xfiles yes!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Ohh, I'm liking xfiles.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, can I express my strong dislike for program names that offer very little clue as to their function?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:  xfiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>xfiles is good</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>..or...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>..Roamer or Scout..<br />
<br />
OK..I'll stop now.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Uggh</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I first thought &quot;digger is cool&quot;.  But somehow voted for &quot;File Digger&quot; and now that I see its the most popular I feel that I've waisted my vote.   Oh Well.  XFce is a great project and have really enjoyed using it on FreeSBIE.<br />
<br />
-GeekGod</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xflorer </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>a tribute to explorer.exe <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>FileXpress</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>As in, it gets you fast from one point to the next, and it makes your files express themselves. Well, I had to try <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFCE File Manager name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XFiles is the best so far, I also thought maybe XFSee.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thunar and xfiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I think Thunar is still the best option. Besides overall coolness, it has the advantage of high relevancy when googling for the thing. On the other thing, xfiles is a very good pun...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thunar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Anything that sounds like it should be followed by &quot;the Barbarian&quot; is an awesome name!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>why not just fix/fork nautilus?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>but even a more salient question - do people even use file managers? my feeling is that most unix people do 99% of their &quot;file management&quot; in a terminal.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>stick with simple names</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>like xffm2 or mffx</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thunar all the way</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It's an original name and it sounds quite good. The abovementioned high relevancy when searching with Google is indeed a great asset. Imagine searching for &quot;File Manager&quot;... time wasted.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFrig</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>As in &quot;where the frig did they put that file?&quot; Kind of a cross between digger and xfile. Since most computer nuts love to use initials , you could see 4F (Friggin Fast File Finder)or Freaky Fast File Finder. Better than Beagel. How about XLab, or PoodleX ? Yuk, gotta cut back on the coffee!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thunar or XFiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I voted for Thunar but i also like XFiles ALOT ... it just fits in with the naming of all the other XFCE stuff.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How about Bob?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well, it's a better name than most of those in the poll <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
I did vote for Thunar however, but XFiles is also a cool name.<br />
<br />
And I do want a decent filemanager as I only do about 50% of my filemanagement in a terminal, I'm hoping Thunar will better suit me than ROX once it's finished.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>jaja</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Xfiles is good</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hmm</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thunar File Manager<br />
<br />
anyway IMHO they all suck <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Why a new file manager? What's wrong with ROX filer?<br />
<br />
rehdon</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>File manager</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>From an HCI point of view, only something like File Manager of XFCE File Manager seem reasonable</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@Giorgos</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Can you be a little more specific? Doing a &quot;modern version&quot; of xffm doesn't make much sense to me (at least if it won't offer the possibility to split a window, like Konqueror does).<br />
<br />
rehdon</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Memorable Name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The mascot is a &quot;mouse&quot;.  So, the mouse that roared...  <br />
<br />
ROAR:   Rapid  Omnipresent Access and Retrieval  :-)<br />
<br />
<br />
marytee</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pathfinder or XF-something</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thunar is simply horrible. It seems the name of a barbarian, or of some oozing alien race from Pluto. It sucks.<br />
<br />
I voted for Pathfinder because it is both straightforward and lightly humorous. Someone stated this name can be already in use. If this is the case, well, stick with something like xffm or xfiles or anything simple, straightforward that begins with XF.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Honestly</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>all of the proposed names suck</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XF-seeker</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Wouldn't calling it X-files present a legal problem?<br />
I prefer XF-seeker or XF-ceeker.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Remember</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...and remeber that Walter should not be used too because it was used for Haiku before... ;]<br />
<br />
...But seriously... I didn't get too excited about all this names... some of they are not so bad... but we're selecting a name to this project with some care, what about take a look in these options and their legal aplications... (of course a /true/ original name should be better, but at least lets see if there's no legal problems with the name before actually using it!)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I agree with the coward on the front page</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XF-Filer sounds good...not so hot on Xfiler cause I think that would cause confusion with  people thinking it has to do with &quot;X&quot; itself.<br />
<br />
<br />
and his suggestion for xfce to be xfde is good to. Making sense is not a bad thing as OSS seems to get outhand with naming of projects and what not. I mean, I as a geek am cool with it but not everyone is a scifi geek or a geek in general</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Keep XF</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Whatever name will be choosen, I suggest to keep the XF prefix. Doesn't really matter if that's XF Filer, XF Digger, or XF Finder. Althought the other names may sound a little bit strange with an XF prefix.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Cabinet!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Voted for Cabinet. Think it's the most recogniseable and nice name of them.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why not just fix/fork nautilus?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;...most unix people do 99% of their &quot;file management&quot; in a terminal.&quot;<br />
<br />
Which is why we need a new file manager - one that enables users to do all their file managing, including sylinks (relative and absolute), pattern matching, compound commands and such; and wich does so in such a way that it is /less/ work than the command line.  This doesn't yet exist (to my knowledge) and I doubt it ever will.<br />
<br />
If this is such a program, call it &quot;File Manager&quot; because you won't need anything else.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about XFLeader ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>X for Linux<br />
F for file<br />
and Leader<br />
<br />
Because a file leader is , like the dictionnairy says ...<br />
<br />
   File leader, the soldier at the front of any file, who<br />
      covers and leads those in rear of him.<br />
<br />
so its not only managing the file but its protecting and <br />
showing them to the users.<br />
<br />
Seeya !!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Cabinet</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I voted Cabinet, it is something I could relate when I need to look for files. If I use XFCE for the first time and see the app named Cabinet I would definitely think it's the file manager.<br />
In that case you could just name them File Manager or similar, but I think that's too generic and sounds lazy in a way.<br />
Look what we have now:<br />
Finder (Mac) - Sounds right, &quot;need a file, find it!&quot;<br />
Explorer (Windows) - Sounds right, maybe just a bit too wide, more appropriate for Internet browsing<br />
Nautilus (Gnome) - Sounds OK, for a scuba diver maybe, nothing to do with coumputers.<br />
Konqueror (KDE) - While the app is OK, you have no idea what's all about until you click on it.<br />
Cabinet (XFCE) - Probably the best and most appropriate name for a file manager I have ever heard<br />
<br />
Cheers guys, and think of us, the endusers, when you choose the name</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFiler</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>would have gotten my vote if it was in the poll (there were so many choices, maybe it was in the poll and I missed it?).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>   File leader, the soldier at the front of any file, who
 re : Cabinet</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Dont like Cabinet ...<br />
<br />
In french it is where you go for your needs !!!<br />
<br />
Yerk !!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@ jasenko</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Explorer (Windows) - Sounds right, maybe just a bit too wide, more appropriate for Internet browsing<br />
Konqueror (KDE) - While the app is OK, you have no idea what's all about until you click on it. <br />
<br />
[KC]onquering is just one step further than Exploring.  Hence the name, I think. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Easy to type...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I like &quot;clerk&quot;, but the one that gets chosen should be easy to type. please.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFiler</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XFiler gets my vote too <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFDigger</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I like XFDigger, it just sounds right. It's not to plain but still keeps the general XFCE naming scheme. Plus, Digger some what implies a file-manager.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@jasenko</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Konqueror (KDE) - While the app is OK, you have no idea what's all about until you click on it. <br />
<br />
So now, you not even require to build and design and name software environments for people who arent highly proficient at computers, like it was trendy for a time when HIGshit was introduced, but to accomodate them to people who actually _never_ used a computer, or a special desktop environment?<br />
<br />
Call me arrogant, but I dont think that anybody who cannot remember the name or the icon of the app he/she will use the most on his computer for the years to come, actually has the brains to make anything useful of a computer besides playing solitaire, if he/she even manages to find out and remember what the name solitaire stands for and how to play it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How about mighty mouse?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>how about </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Tiffany, Heather, Cody, Dylan, Dermott, Jordan, Taylor, Brittany, Wesley, Rumer, Scout, Cassidy, Zoe, Chloe, Max, Hunter, Kendal, Katlin, Noah, Sasha, Morgan, Kira, Ian, Lauren, Q-bert, Phil</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The best name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>You suck!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: how about</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Would &quot;Noah&quot; support ARK compression, and keep automatic backups so that there are two of each file?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>As many have said so-far, had XFiles been an option, I'd have chosen that.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How about ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Serenity&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Serenity?!!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Yes, and it will have flowers and pink easter bunnies! I feel pretty!!! Oh so pretty!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This should be too hard people.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Just use &quot;XFile&quot;<br />
<br />
Drop the &quot;r&quot; off &quot;Xfiler&quot; and say to heck with that old Fox TV show.  <br />
<br />
&quot;XFile&quot; would be perfect.  Simple, short and carries the &quot;XF&quot; of XFCE in it.<br />
<br />
so there.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: stick with simple names</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Admiral, I assume you're joking. &quot;xffm2 or mffx&quot;? How are those simple? Simple to type in? I'd rather have simple to remember. They just don't roll off the tongue. &quot;Ex eff eff emm too&quot;... the whole UNIX unpronounceable acronym cliche has got to stop (dear Lord please make it stop). It should be easy to remember and easier to pronounce. <br />
<br />
The XFce guys *should* be thinking of a better name for XFce. It isn't very memorable. Change it to &quot;X-Force&quot; or something. Seriously... why all of these projects have such forgettable names is beyond me. They can name them whatever they want, but if they want potential new users to remember their project, a better name would help.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>There's already a conductor</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Just so it's out in the open.  The company I work for has a commercial application based on Linux, it's called &quot;Conductor&quot;.<br />
<br />
It might be best to avoid that name, I can't imagine we'd be too annoyed if Thunar did end up being called that, but it's probably not worth the hassle on either side of the coin.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Skipper</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Just want to tell you that skipper means sailor in danish, actual &quot;papay the sailor&quot; is kalled &quot;Skipper Skræk&quot;...<br />
A wird name for a file manager, but great fun</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFfm</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XFfm sounds good to me. Short, concise, yet descriptive.<br />
<br />
Barring that, I vote for calling it Shirley.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Rover is the name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I think Rover is best choice. I don't think it's used any where else (unlike pathfinder) and the name is related to the task. something like Mars Rover. where Rover can help you discover things on your hard drive</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: XFile</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I like it, XFile, simple yet affordable.  Not too shabby, a bird in the hand... (if you know what i mean) Dashing, Fun, easy to remember, and unlike anything else ( except that old TV show, But who gives a crap.)  XFILE RULES!!!!!!  Go to MRAF.com.  It rules!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>the best name yet</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I really like: megaman, you know <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  Like mega manager. That would be cool. or xman. That would be cool too. I like to have man in my name <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sonar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>explores the depth of your harddrive!!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sonar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>explores the depth of your harddrive!!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>My suggestion!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XFactor!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFactor!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well, I should have said a bit more on my suggestion.<br />
<br />
XFactor: It sounds like the file manager to be an essential core component of the Desktop. And the pronunciation is forceful and matches the Desktop's name &quot;XFce&quot;. And the name contains the meaning that it's gonna make XFce popular with an unexplainable reason (or more like with an mysterious power).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>pathfinder</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>There's also a pathfinder bundled with the Fox toolkit.  Sorry if that's been said 50 times already, I didn't read <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Xfiles</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I say Xfiles is the best by far <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>too many complicated and unrelated choices</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>they should choose an original name (pathfinder and all that crap is out of the question) but some of them are 'oh man' cant even pronounce them ... ... <br />
i chose skipper sounds best of all those options<br />
digger is kinda rough<br />
and xfiles does sound good but then again remindes me of x-files series, again not original<br />
<br />
just my opinion</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Hmmm.....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Since XFce has a mouse for the logo, why not name it after the fastest mouse ever? Speedy. Something like XFSpeedy or SpeedyXF perhaps.<br />
<br />
XFile or XFiler are also very good. <br />
I didn't like any of the ones in the poll, sorry.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>they suck.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>really.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XF-Filer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I like XF-Filer or what about XFFM.2<br />
<br />
XINN is also pretty cool, but I think you should stick to descriptive names. I'm going to go with Filer.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFCA...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Or any contraction of XFCE Cabinet, like xfcab, would be great.<br />
Xfile(s) sounds good too, and maybe by going the &quot;xfile&quot; road instead of the &quot;xfiles&quot; road, we could prevent some FOX hunting <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yet another name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>What about Mouse-Filer ?<br />
A little long, but no confusion with &quot;official&quot; XFce File Manager and still a reference to the Xfce mouse.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
