<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/10284/Java_Desktop_for_X_v0_5_released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:31:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>see</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>thats what I was talking about....<br />
<br />
ages ago when the Sun Java Desktop came along.<br />
I though the Sun attempt was going to be like this. I was wrong. It was just another Linux<br />
<br />
But this looks very interesting, I will give it a go tomorrow, too tired tonight</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hmmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'm gonna try this..<br />
<br />
I wonder if this could easily be ported to JNode (an opensource Java OS).. Thus fulfilling Sun's 10 year old promise of a Java OS! Oh yeah I also remember at some point Sun wanted Java CPUs lol... Is anybody up for designing one? <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>At least they won't...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...have the argument if they should include Java or Mono/C# as the next level language/environment for the DE.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Screenshots</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>the screenshots look pretty good for an early stage desktop! i'll be keeping an eye on this as it develops!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why Java?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Seriously, why? Just because they thought it would be an interesting thing to do, or is there more to it than that?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Perfect for Java!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Perhaps sharing desktop Jvm can save system resources. Eg. memory usage. Applications and desktop might be faster when sharing a single Jvm process than it would be to have a process for each Jvm application. Also may be it makes sense to reuse the large amount of Java OSS applications and libraries out there. A single toolkit environment like Java can make development very easy for larger projects. And lastly no shared library hell to maintain.<br />
<br />
Just a wild guess!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
