<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/10891/slamd64_10_1_released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:36:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Nice!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It's great to see Slackware being ported to another (soon to be heavily used) architecture, although I question the name change. There's more than enough &quot;splinters&quot; of established distro's and half-baked ones that call themselves distro's, so I'm not sure if this is a positive thing for the OS community.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>name</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I wish they called it Slackware 10.1 x86_64 or something. I know generally speaking its irrelevant but I am getting kinda tired of names in the OSS community.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Official?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I hope it will be official one day. Slackware is good distro, it will teach you everything about Linux background stuff. I bet it will rock on AMD64 more than ever!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@ Wally</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I absolutely KonKur with you on this. ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Name</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If I had called Slackware x86_64, it would have implied it was official.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>huh</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>im not a slacker but i do understand the roots of this distro etc.   can someone please explain to me why there isnt an official slack64 distro yet?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>R3000z Success anyone</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Anyone have success with r3000z before I give it a try.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>how about pat?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>@ broken windows: because pat is very busy and had a serious ilness for about half a year<br />
<br />
@ Frederick Emmott: hell of a job, looks very cool. now i have to buy an amd64 :-)  do you and pat synchronize the effort?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: how about pat?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>We don't. I rsync the source/, and port it.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>slamd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>bout time! <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" />  I love slackware and have been using current since 9.1. Don't have a 64bit system because there was no 64bit slack, but now I have a reason to upgrade.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>nice!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I don't have a 64bit system either, but as a die-hard Slacker I love to see this.  Great job, Frederick!!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>official?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hi Frederick,do you have any plans to make it an official slackware port?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good Work Fred!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Excellent job! I think the name is great considering it is just your show without the offical Pat V. sanctioning.<br />
<br />
One can't help but wonder though why the newly released Slackware book wasn't announced here on osnews.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: official?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Not my call.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good work</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Good work Frederick!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Good Work Fred!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>One can't help but wonder though why the newly released Slackware book wasn't announced here on osnews.<br />
<br />
I have been wondering about for ten solid years, goes to show you never know. Really, I am as honest as a Denver man can be.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thanks for the hard work!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hey Frederick, thanks so much for all the hard work that went into creating slamd64!  It's great and also very much appreciated that you were willing to take up the task of porting a great distro to the 64-bit architecture.  Keep up the good work and my hat's off to you!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 04:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>WTF  the 3rd cd wont fit</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The 3rd CD is 721 MB how do I burn this.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>/</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>typo:closely</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
