<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/10904/Working_with_SUSE_Linux_Enterprise_Server_9</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:23:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>is SLES still relevant?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Not sure I see a lot of momentum behind Novell's efforts, despite IBM pushing them. It's cool stuff, but is it worth the time? Does anybody use SLES?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SLES9 works well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>SLES9 is a good product, I was happy with SUSE 9.1 (SLES9 built on 9.1) and now I am happy to see that exteneded into SLES9. When you build SLES 9 into a enterprise that has ZENWorks for Linux, SLES9 really pulls ahead of all the others.. I think once the market sees this, we will see a big shift in the useage of SLES9</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SuSe Relevance</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I hope so - I just see Red Hat everywhere, jacking up prices, and IBM doing their best to push SuSe without much success. The policy stuff Novell has is pretty cool, we'll see what Red Hat does with Sun's directory stuff though.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Novell and SuSE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>My company was interested by migrating from Windows to SuSe but since the Novell's acquisition, the study went down : Novell is hurting SuSE and the best Novell can do is to liberate the SuSE entity (or to build a new independant business based on SuSE)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not a big fan</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>All in all when we were looking a migrating to Linux my boss and the CIO were insistant on using Suse. Personally im instantly annoyed by &quot;pay for&quot; distro's. I didn't like Yast. I thought it was cumbersome especially when you consider apt's elegance. That there says alot. I had a hard time compiling simple programs as well. <br />
<br />
If your company is looking to Suse for the &quot;support&quot; portion you can buy a service contract for Debian and even Fedora from HP!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great for enterprise</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>it's a strong linux distribution with a excellent support<br />
<br />
the price is low for a server... for client, you can get suse linux pro for a couple of dollar<br />
<br />
yast is very great and easy to use<br />
windows user will love it<br />
<br />
anyway, user will not install software... it's the technician... who suppose to do this job</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Novell and SuSE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Novell is hurting SuSE and the best Novell can do is to liberate the SuSE&quot;<br />
<br />
I'd be interested to hear why you think Novell is 'hurting' SuSE. Why do you say this? Do you think SuSE had more credibility in the enterprise arena *prior* to being acquired by Novell?<br />
<br />
&quot;I didn't like Yast. I thought it was cumbersome especially when you consider apt's elegance.&quot;<br />
<br />
You aren't comparing like for like though, are you? apt is a package management tool, YaST is a set-up and management tool. Perhaps if you'd made the effort to use the right tool you wouldn't have struggled so much.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Trolls!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Is anything said by some anonymous idiot calling himself &quot;Linux_Fanata&quot; relevant? Is it worth the time? Does anybody read what he writes and shakes his head?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>stupid Trolls!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'm so sick and tired of reading the bullshit from<br />
the trolls.  SuSE is hands down one of the best distributions out there.  It's not perfect, but nothing is.<br />
<br />
YaST is the most capable configuration tool out there<br />
for Linux. If you want to complain about it, then you<br />
should a better alternative.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>stupid Trolls!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I mean,<br />
<br />
If you put down YaST, you should suggest a better<br />
alternative.  Otherwise, stop BS'ing...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>AppWall</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Since Novell bought Imunnix i wonder if they will include Appwall soon in SLES and the successor of the strong 9.3?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Trolls</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hmmm. I believe I suggested apt as an alternative. Im unclear as to what you mean by BS'ing.<br />
<br />
-nX</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Idiot</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>call me when the companies start making it's products on linux, like games, etc. call me when you have a decent GUI, and not something like full of hacks like x11, call me when you have a decent OS. <br />
<br />
Linux sucks as well as the GNU movement.	<br />
<br />
LOL!!!! Cause you know, companies buy a server OS to play games and have a pretty gui on it. What a fuck-tard.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>doubt</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Stupid people just bought this shit, I will never spend a dollar on it, Linux sucks and who want to spend money on that shit piece of software.<br />
<br />
I doubt Novell cares. Last I checked, they were marketing SLES for businesses, not random pathetic internet trolls.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SLES 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It's been very trouble free for me here for several months now. While I have my complaints when it comes to some of the hoops you have to jump through occasionally to get some things to compile or install properly on SuSE, it's been my main Linux for quite a while now. Many of the 'causes' of the hoop jumping are actually for the better when their end results and benefits are weighed against the inconveiniences during install/compile. I usually only install something once, but use it many times.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
