<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/11921/Review_HP_iPaq_rx3115_Mobile_Media_Companion</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:27:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I own an rx3715</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33497</guid>
			<description>I own a HP iPAQ rx3715, it has 96MB User storage on board, but i still use a 512MB SD card for storing music, and such on.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Andrew Youll)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I own an rx3715</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33502</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33502</guid>
			<description>Yup, the rx3715 has 128 MBs of flash storage, and 32 MBs of it goes to the OS ROM (that's why 96 MBs are free for usage).<br />
<br />
In the rx3115 case though, HP went too cheap, and instead of including a 64 MB flash chip (and hense leave ~30 MBs of available storage for the user), it included a 32 MB chip, which only leaves 3.8 MBs for available storage.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>off base review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33509</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33509</guid>
			<description>Cheap piece of junk Pocket PC that has been languishing on the shelves for good reason.  This entire series has been a huge flop for HP.  Run do not walk to the 22XX series or 47XX series Pocket PC for a decent device.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: off base review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33511</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33511</guid>
			<description>&gt;Cheap piece of junk Pocket PC<br />
<br />
This is not true. The rx3xxx are as good of PDAs like any other PPC is. Plus it has the additional multimedia software. Your remark was not fair.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE IPAQ</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33529</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33529</guid>
			<description>Welcome back Eugenia !!!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anand78)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: off base review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33597</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33597</guid>
			<description>I don't think you are in a position to judge &quot;fairness&quot; of remarks, Eugenia. Opinions are opinions, we are all entitled to them, and if you want to disagree with someone, that's fine. However, you are in no position to judge &quot;fairness&quot; of somebody's opinion. Neither of you qualify your comments any more than stating your opinions with absolutely no backing facts, so I suppose that makes your opinion &quot;unfair&quot; as well? Children.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>upper limit memory constraint</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33610</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33610</guid>
			<description>rx3115 is pretty nifty indeed, and has come down tremendously in price over the last year.  My next purchase for it will be a pair of bluetooth stereo headphones - and I used it to pick up some skills on programming for Windows Mobile Devices and Bluetooth.  You really can't beat it - essentially a whole platform for $200!<br />
<br />
Recently, I picked up a 1GB Flash card, and the upped the media use of this device.  My only gripe is that upon adding the card, the device registered 982MB of free memory (instead of 1024)... So that's about 40MB of memory that I can't use.  (I think I read somewhere that it has an upper limitation of 1GB total).  Not that I'm deeply concerned, it just seems like a bit of a waste.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (frank)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>WTF</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33623</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33623</guid>
			<description>Welcome back Eugenia !!!<br />
Score: -5<br />
<br />
What the Fuck is going on. This point system is really Fucked Up.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33632</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33632</guid>
			<description>is there anyway to connect a Windows Mobile device to a mac?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33635</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33635</guid>
			<description>Yes. For pre-Windows Mobile 5, you can use iSync. For better results/features and for WM5 support, you can buy the MissingSync: <a href="http://www.markspace.com/missingsync_windowsmobile.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.markspace.com/missingsync_windowsmobile.php</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33643</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33643</guid>
			<description>Thank You<br />
<br />
[probably get a -5]<br />
<br />
I have a 2nd hand palm, which syncs quite well, but they seem to be losing the battle with MS PDA devices. The Remote control seems nice<br />
<br />
How well do they surf the internet access email?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33650</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33650</guid>
			<description>&gt;How well do they surf the internet access email?<br />
<br />
The PocketPCs are superior to Palms in terms of web surfing. The Palm has various ODM ports of Netfront (under different names, &quot;WebPro&quot; and &quot;Blazer&quot; is one of those) and AvantGo as its main browsers.<br />
<br />
The PocketPC side has Internet Explorer (engine equivelant to desktop IE 4.5), the latest NetFront 3.2 and AvantGo.<br />
<br />
However, the biggest advantage of PPCs over Palm web surfing is not the actual browser, but the PPC font engine. As you can see in my screenshot of osnews running on Pocket IE, PPCs support AA TTF fonts, which account for better readability and smaller, but crispier fonts. Which means that PPCs can cram more information and crisp text in their QVGA screens than the 320x320 and sometimes even the 320x480 Palms.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33669</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33669</guid>
			<description>the HP rx3### PocketPC's are not supported by iSync, I bought PocketMAC Pro as it said it supported the iPAQ rx3715, it connects and works to some degree, how ever I can not say whether or not &quot;The Missing Sync&quot; has better support for the rx3### series iPAQ's</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Andrew Youll)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Mac</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?33671</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?33671</guid>
			<description>Honestly, the MissingSync has superior support for any other Mac-PPC solution. I have used it with both Palms and PPCs and it worked pretty well. The only problem with PPCs on the Macs is the fact that some third party PPC software only come in .exe format and not in .cab format, and so the Mac can't load .exe in the devices.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
