http://www.osnews.com/story/12615/Gaim_Kills_Off_Gaim-VV_Webcam_Support_ Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Tue, 21 May 2013 20:59:22 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif http://www.osnews.com http://www.osnews.com/thread?59048 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59048 but google dose not own GAIM

how about forking it and makign GAIM-X

GAIM in Exile Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:12:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (modmans2ndcoming) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59053 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59053 Now someone else will end up picking it up, hopefully. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:21:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (ma_d) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59054 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59054 That's the problem with open source. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:21:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (googlegaim) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59056 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59056 Since the developer was hired by google, I guess you could expect he (as a open source developer) gives preference to the things he know better and will work to add webcam later? I want to hear both sides, I _very much_ doubt google and that developer has any interest in delaying a feature which everyone want...maybe -vv voice support is crappy and he thinks he can do it better? (though -vv seems to have a better design from the post)


Anyway, just for those who may need an OSS IM program with webcam suport, kopete CVS has webcam support for msn at least, will be available in kde 3.5... Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:23:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (diegocg) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59059 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59059 You're only right because we can insert anything to define your hanging pronoun. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:28:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (ma_d) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59063 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59063 we will have to go to alternatives then...
kopete's webcam support is already in cvs, so does amsn cvs
i think Mercury supports it too

really sad to see this kind of stuff Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:33:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (thjayo) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59065 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59065 That's the problem with open source.

Yes, the problem with open source is that the code is still there for anyone who wants to work on it. Now, if it were a closed source code, no-one would ever know about this and the project would die quietly. Nice. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:35:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Sodki) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59068 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59068 Eugenia, there's a link in the gaim mailing list from gaim's developer explaining why he does what it's doing, perhaps you should include it in the header? (my humble opinion

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8864408&... Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:39:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (diegocg) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59071 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59071 Sure anybody could but the likely hood of that happening is very low. The fact of the matter is the Lead Developer decided he couldn't live on free beer alone and now has other thing he needs to work on. If it was a commercial product which had amassed this amount of market share the lead developer probably could have continued to support and enhance the product. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:42:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (googlegaim) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59074 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59074 Sure anybody could but the likely hood of that happening is very low.

I very much disagree. It is extremely likely that someone will fork Gaim if its lead developer really is obstructing progress on features that users really want.

Look at how many Linux distros we have that are forks created by dissatisfied users. This is where Mandrake Linux came from. Red Hat said they were relegating KDE to the backburner with only one maintainer on staff, and Mandrake stepped up to create a Red Hat compatible distro with first-class KDE support, among other things. Mandrake later evolved to be much more than this, but I think it's a good illustration of forking at its best. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:48:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (the_trapper) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59075 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59075 And Mandrake has now stolen the large market share that RedHat used to have or does RedHat still have the largest share of the commercial Market? Just because something is forked doesn't mean people will Migrate in large numbers. Most will stay with the main branch the more things fork the more incompatibilities are introduced. But I suppose we could just fork again to try and solve those problems. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:55:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (googlegaim) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59083 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59083 People seem to be in a state of Denial about Open Source. I was merely trying to start a dialog but I guess people want to continue to live in their state of denial as they vote my comments down.

I like opensorce software and use it everyday. That does not change the fact though that there really are a number of problems with it's long term supportability and viability. People need food and money to live and a job which will pay them. Businesses are in business to make money not free software. There is plenty of money to be made in supporting free software just like there is in supporting propriety software.

Companies like Redhat face a challenge in that there software is opensource so anybody can access the source. This means I can get my support from a number of people. In my case the hardware vendor, sure the hardware vendor might kick back a little bit of the support money to Redhat but if they didn't want to do they need to? This leaves Redhat and any other opensource software, somebody other than the principle developer decides to make money off of in a tough spot.

A number of entities have realized this and gone closed source or created closed source values adds most recently Nessus has decided to go closed source. And yes I know there is a fork already. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:28:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (googlegaim) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59088 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59088 Googlegaim, only reply to the actual news item and don't start off topic generic conversations that eventually lead to flamewars. We don't want them here. If your next comment is not on topic, you will be banned. This is your first and last warning. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:32:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59093 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59093 So long! Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:44:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (googlegaim) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59096 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59096 I think we don't know the whole story here, so its a little wrong to start making sweeping, bloodthirsty flames about it.

But i must say it seems contrary to how most open source projects work. If there's useful code that is even the seeds of a possible feature, it shouldn't be ruled out. Maybe the lead developer doesn't want to work on it, but maybe someone else does. Especially if there's solid audio code already.

Something seems fishy here. But as long as its GPL software, there's no sense getting real pissed off about it. Someone else can take control if Google screws it. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:58:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (mike hess) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59097 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59097 GAIM is fortunately released under the GPL license, so anyone may modify it as they see fit.
GAIM can be forked. One being the Google GAIM and one being the GAIM with the video capability.

The two GAIMs can compete depending on the needs of its users. And as they are both released under the GPL, there will be no licensing trouble about recombing the best features of each if one so chooses.

This is where the GPL really shines. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:59:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (nii_) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59116 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59116 As long as the current GAIM devs/maintainers don't actively stop video capabilities from being added to GAIM, there is no reason why someone else shouldn't add it if they can. There would be no point to forking GAIM if the devs allow patches to be submitted. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:04:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (youknowmewell) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59146 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59146 I modded you up again because I really couldn't see any reason for modding you down. Other than ignorance, of course.

So, for the ignorant, I'll explain:
What ma_d says is that the only reason the GP was correct, was that he didn't specify what he meant by "that", the hanging pronoun. Not specifying "this", "that", "these", "those", etc is a common mistake and usually leaves the sentence rather ambiguous at best. GP's post can then be interpreted as anything, for instance:

"Having Ignorant anti-FOSS zealots commenting on stuff they don't understand is the problem with open source." Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:34:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (CrimsonScythe) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59178 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59178 i thought kopete was behind gaim, as the gaim dev's made some noise about the webcam support quite some time ago. now it seems kopete is running up-front, as kde 3.5 might very well have msn webcam support

seems typical - g(nome/aim/whatever) promisses, KDE delivers Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:46:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (superstoned) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59195 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59195 Actually has msn webcam support. So there is a Linux Free Software app with this feature. Cool, no ? Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:35:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (LinuxDesktopUser) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59214 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59214 So? The fact that people didn't migrate means the original is better than the fork. It's free market at work. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:42:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (FooBarWidget) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59236 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59236 Basically, it is a bit dangerous for the openness of an open source project for one lead developer who has control, or a number of developers, to be employed by one company. And no, it doesn't matter how liberal the license is.

It's clear why this has happened. Sean has had pressure put on him for Gaim to basically become a Google-only IM client. Goodbye Yahoo, MSN and any other network's support. Gaim is Google's personal open source project now, and I'm surprised at Google because they should know about the politics and trouble that could ensue as a result of something like this. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:04:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59245 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59245 You sure aren't jumping the gun here by predicting the demise of support for every protocol other than Jabber's support in gaim or anything. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:05:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (japail) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59255 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59255 I see no problem with what is happening, I would much prefer to have full duplex audio than one way video. And if this lays the foundation for duplex video & audio then it's for the best IMHO.

However, nothing is stopping anyone from forking GAIM. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:11:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (endy) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59258 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59258 You sure aren't jumping the gun here by predicting the demise of support for every protocol other than Jabber's support in gaim or anything.

In Google's employees' worlds yes. However, since anybody can actually use Jabber maybe that's not such a bad thing. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:23:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59259 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59259 I disagree.

Supposeing Google forces Sean to remove ALL protocol compatibility besides Google. It doesn't really matter, in fact, it may be preferable.

Let Google give the FOSS community a bunch of free code. We'll take it. And then we'll start our own project.

More Free Code > Less Free Code

As long as its free, there's very little harm any corporation can actually inflict. Developers will always have the power. Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:32:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (mike hess) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59273 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59273 The update to this story, which links to a post by one of the coders, clearly states that video is not being abandoned.

He said that Gstreamer & farsight is not mature enough to use, and that he is currently focusing on audio.

Farsight is a project concerned with audio & video for all the major IM networks, and when the gaim team consider it mature enough then they can use it, and gaim will support audio & video.

farsight is a project whose coders, I believe, are mainly concerned with aMSN. The point of the farsight project, though, is to develop support for audio & video in a way that allows any IM project to use it.

I have used the video support that aMSN offers, which I believe is done using farsight, and I have to agree that although it's good it's not mature.

Link to farsight here:

http://projects.collabora.co.uk/farsight/wiki/RoadMap Edited 2005-11-11 15:52 Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:50:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (cookieninja) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?59443 http://www.osnews.com/thread?59443 However, nothing is stopping anyone from forking GAIM.

Which others have to maintain. It's just not that simple, although at times it seems like it is. Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:12:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum) Comments