<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/12823/Review_Linux-based_TVisto_Series_3_5_Multimedia_HDD_Enclosure</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:37:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>No network jack?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66659</guid>
			<description>What were they thinking? If it had a network jack I would consider getting one, but I'd hate to have to this thing to my desktop just to load up the files.<br />
<br />
<br />
matt</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vondur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No network jack?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66666</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66666</guid>
			<description>Well, don't forget that this IS a mobile solution. So getting it to your PC is not a big deal. But yes, there is some inconvenience there.<br />
<br />
In my case, it is very easy to actually move the enclosure, but it's really a pain to have to also move the power supply to my office and re-attach it there. I have LOTS of  cables on the back of my desks and doing so is really, really a pain.<br />
<br />
So, yeah, while moving the enclosure itself is easy, having to deal with the power supply is not. This is why an ethernet jack with a samba server in it would be ideal.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TVisto vs. Mvisto</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66682</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66682</guid>
			<description>The Mvisto looks even better; it appears to be the same hardware/firmware as the TVisto but in a much smaller case. Unfortunately the Mvisto appears to be available in every country except the USA!?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wes Felter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: TVisto vs. Mvisto</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66686</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66686</guid>
			<description>The MVisto is for 2.5&quot; laptop hard drives, which are more expensive and slower than the 3.5&quot; ones.<br />
<br />
Alternatively, you can always get the TVisto for 2.5&quot; if you really need something really small. It's linked from the article above.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66715</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66715</guid>
			<description>On the TVisto's site, systems requirements I noticed it only shows it is for Windows and MAC.<br />
How come no mention of Linux.<br />
It is running Linux, and you would think even if the bigger market is for Windows users, at least a mention of Linux should be appropriate.<br />
<br />
This makes no sense.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (LinuxHawk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>interesting</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66720</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66720</guid>
			<description>From the pictures of the back, it looks like they use some sort of proprietary video/audio connectors.  They provide one A/V cable with the package.  For VGA/HDTV video and digital audio, it looks like you have to purchase some additional accessories.<br />
<br />
There seems to be some good potential for car installs.  I really like that it supports ISOs and Ogg Vorbis.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66721</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66721</guid>
			<description>For a commercial company, it does make sense of sense actually. Points:<br />
<br />
1. MacPower, the manufacturer, doesn't necessarily develops the firmware too. In this case, they don't have developers on board to &quot;force&quot; their marketing/sales dept to support Linux as a desktop platform for it.<br />
2. Most Linux distributions don't mount automatically and give the right RW permissions to normal users. This is a major support headache for all similar companies. They simply don't want to deal with it (and I personally would do the same, support people cost too much).<br />
3. Formatting the disk (which is required the first time you put a new drive in it) under Linux is also not a &quot;right-click affair&quot;. Again, support costs.<br />
4. The recommended file system to format the drive with is NTFS. Many Linux distros don't come with NTFS pre-installed because of patent issues, so users would have to use either FAT32 (which is problematic with filesizes over 4GB) or HFS+ (which Windows doesn't support -- no other file systems are supported by the firmware).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Compare 3.5&amp;quot; and 2.5&amp;quot; versions by features</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66723</guid>
			<description>3.5&quot;:<br />
<br />
# Playback Media Formats Video:<br />
# MPEG-1 (AVI, MPG)<br />
# MPEG-2 (AVI, VOB), ISO<br />
# MPEG-4 (AVI, DivX, DivX VOD, XviD)<br />
<br />
# DivX Subtitle:<br />
# SUB (MicroDVD format)<br />
# SRT (SubRIP format)<br />
# SMI (SAMI format)<br />
# Embedded Multiple Subtitle support<br />
<br />
# Audio:<br />
# WAV<br />
# MP3<br />
# MPEG-4 (AAC)<br />
# WMA<br />
# AC3<br />
# OGG Vorbis<br />
<br />
# Photo:<br />
# JPG baseline and progressive up to 8 mega pixel  <br />
<br />
# Supported File Systems:<br />
# NTFS<br />
# FAT32<br />
# HFS+<br />
<br />
2.5&quot;:<br />
<br />
# Playback Media Formats Video:<br />
# MPEG-1 (AVI, MPG)<br />
# MPEG-2 (AVI, VOB)<br />
# MPEG-4 (AVI, DivX, DivX VOD, XviD)<br />
<br />
# Audio:<br />
# MP3<br />
<br />
# Photo:<br />
# JPG baseline and progressive up to 8 mega pixel  <br />
<br />
# Supported File Systems:<br />
# FAT32 (single or up to 4 multiple partitions)<br />
<br />
Isn't the difference a little bit too drastic? Why is format and FS support in the 2.5&quot; version so poor? After all, 2.5&quot; drives, while smaller, obviously have enough capacity to install all necessary software ;-) They could make a much cooler product with 2.5&quot; (the same versatility plus a more compact package), but apparently didn't want that... What's the reason?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Temcat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Compare 3.5&amp;quot; and 2.5&amp;quot; versions by features</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66728</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66728</guid>
			<description>My guess is that because the 2.5&quot; is physically much smaller, they had to use less memory and maybe even less video-related electronics. For example, if the firmware of the 3.5&quot; runs on 4 MBs with two chips of 2 MBs each, they had to run on a single chip of 2 MBs on the 2.5&quot; version. And that would mean only one thing: removal of drivers and code in order to fit on the 2 MBs ROM.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about quality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66763</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66763</guid>
			<description>Eugenia,<br />
<br />
From a layman's point of view what was the video and audio playback quality like compared to PC, any unecpected artifacts, colours, pops etc?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about quality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66769</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66769</guid>
			<description>Quality was really good. Only one DivX video from the 15-20 videos I tried was ignoring some frames (it was not dropping frames per se, it was just ignoring some of them, it seemed like an incompatibility with the switches used on the encoder that created that video -- which seemed to be Cyberlink's encoder).<br />
<br />
Other than that, quality of sound, pictures and all videos was perfect.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>M4A support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66779</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66779</guid>
			<description>Eugenia, can you try playing an .M4A file? The specs are a little unclear about whether this format is supported.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wes Felter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: M4A support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66793</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66793</guid>
			<description>Send me a (small) such file (or a download url) so I can try it. I have no .m4a files here.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Lovely</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66796</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66796</guid>
			<description>This thing looks pretty awesome, I wonder what the hackability of it is?<br />
<br />
I'm thinking about getting one and hacking around with it to get a USB wireless adapter and Samba installed.  (Once  the wireless adapter is installed, one could mount a directory from one's mythtv and use this as a second head for it).<br />
<br />
I was looking at building a wireless mythtv &quot;client&quot; (ie, just the player, no tuners(server in other room)) with similar hardware specs to this and kept coming up around $450, this'll save me some bucks.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (intangible)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Lovely</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66811</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66811</guid>
			<description>Ah, here we go, looking for a solution to make this work wirelessly, found these items; Theoretically, one can just plug it in as a USB drive and go: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=12&amp;l2=44&amp;l3=0&amp;model=460&amp;modelmenu=1" rel="nofollow">http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=12&amp;l2=44&amp;l3=0&amp;mod...</a> <br />
Looks nice and small, does only what you need and nothing more, $88<br />
<br />
<a href="http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=12&amp;l2=43&amp;l3=0&amp;model=359&amp;modelmenu=1" rel="nofollow">http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=12&amp;l2=43&amp;l3=0&amp;mod...</a> <br />
Does a little more, can use as a replacement for my router, $99<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=390" rel="nofollow">http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=390</a><br />
About the same as above, but I seem to find quite a few people with problems with it... $99</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (intangible)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Been looking for somethign like this</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66820</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66820</guid>
			<description>ive seen similar ones, and they all look more like hacks then proffesional products that will maintain support.  One big question for me is: It says it supports VOBs, can it use DVD menus with VOB files?<br />
<br />
Specs arent always everything, has anyone confirmed with the company that the 2.5&quot; has that many more features lacking?  Also any confirmation on FLAC support?<br />
<br />
My basic desires are: FLAC and VOB w/ Menus<br />
<br />
Price is a plus (thats why Im lookuing at the 2.5&quot;)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: M4A support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66829</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66829</guid>
			<description>ok, I encoded an .m4a file with the latest iTunes (non-DRM'ed) and placed it on the device. So, it doesn't play them. I even copy/renamed that .m4a file to .aac or .mp4 (just in case), and it would still not play them. So, I guess it doesn't support that particular file format.<br />
<br />
This is clearly stated on the bottom of their page btw:<br />
<a href="http://www.galaxymetalgear.com/Tvisto.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.galaxymetalgear.com/Tvisto.htm</a><br />
*** AAC stands for &quot;Adaptive Audio Coding&quot; and does not support AAC files created by iTunes!<br />
<br />
If you want me to try a non-iTunes .m4a file, send me one and I will try it for you.Edited 2005-11-29 23:14</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Been looking for somethign like this</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66832</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66832</guid>
			<description>&gt; It says it supports VOBs, can it use DVD menus with VOB files?<br />
<br />
I don't know about .vob files with menus (plain vob do playback), but it DOES support menus when the DVD is extracted as an .ISO instead. It is a much more prefered method to play DVDs via this device.<br />
<br />
&gt;Also any confirmation on FLAC support? <br />
<br />
Not supported.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>NTFS read and WRITE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66847</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66847</guid>
			<description>...NTFS instead of FAT32 or HFS+ (all 3 file systems are supported in read/write mode)...<br />
<br />
What's this? NTFS in read/write? Is that (safely) possible? Are they using OSS drivers, if so which ones?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DittoBox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: NTFS read and WRITE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66853</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66853</guid>
			<description>The device has --obviously-- two modes: one as a simple drive enclosure and one as an embedded multimedia device.<br />
<br />
It is READ-only when Linux loaded when connected on the TV. It is Read-write when you connect the device to a Windows PC. You can't rename/edit/delete files when connected to TV (in linux mode).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: No network jack?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66854</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66854</guid>
			<description>Well, I am pretty lazy, and my computer is in a different building from my house, plus, did I mention I', lazy? <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  Hopefully that rumored Intel Based Apple mac mini thingy will come out. Otherwise one of these days I'm going to have to put together a myth tv box.<br />
<br />
<br />
matt</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vondur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: M4A support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66872</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66872</guid>
			<description>Thanks for trying this. I have to wonder what kind of &quot;MPEG-4 AAC&quot; files exsit that don't use the MP4 container. Maybe raw bitstreams.<br />
<br />
I guess this is the new world of multimedia, where devices support tons of bastardized, nonstandard formats instead of the standard formats.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wes Felter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Eugenia - DVB Support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66886</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66886</guid>
			<description>I was wondering if you could test the following two files for me, they represent a sample DVB (satellite mpeg-2 format). This is the format DISH network uses, at 544x480 resolution NTSC.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://rapidshare.de/files/8356896/DVB_Tvisto_Test.rar.html" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.de/files/8356896/DVB_Tvisto_Test.rar.html</a> <br />
<br />
The .vdr file is from my PVR, the mpg file is the same .vdr file converted into a program stream MPG-2. If you could please try this:<br />
<br />
1. Try to play the .vdr file (if it doesn't recognize the extention..then..see #2)<br />
<br />
2. Rename the .vdr file to .mpg/mpeg and try it.<br />
<br />
3. Try to the converted .mpg file included (it's different than just renaming like above)<br />
<br />
I'd like to know if Tvisto can play raw DVB recordings, either with the .vdr suffix or just renaming it to .mpg. If it won't, I'd like to know if it will play PS MPEG files that are nonstandard NTSC resolutions (544x480).<br />
<br />
SOunds like a lot, but would only take you five minutes max! Thanks!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Eugenia - DVB Support?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66897</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66897</guid>
			<description>1. DVB_544x480_Raw.vdr<br />
Doesn't &quot;see&quot; it at all in the file list.<br />
<br />
2. DVB_544x480_Raw-vdr.mpg (the above renamed)<br />
Doesn't play it at all.<br />
<br />
3. DVB_544x480_Raw.mpg (converted)<br />
Plays it for about 3 seconds correctly and then exits abruptly. It seems to be either too high-res to decode or something else in that specific format that doesn't like.<br />
<br />
Please note that normal .mpg video files play just fine (e.g. SVCD quality).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66899</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66899</guid>
			<description>Thank you very much, that format is nonstadard in almost every way, it was long shot.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: TVisto vs. Mvisto</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66904</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66904</guid>
			<description>Also if you look at the specs, seems like TVisto supports more formats... especially in Audio and subtitles.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mail4asim)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Better Price...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66909</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66909</guid>
			<description>Found it for a little less over here... <br />
<br />
TvistoU2F  $155.00<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dealsurprise.com/raatxmidtoca.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dealsurprise.com/raatxmidtoca.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mail4asim)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: NTFS read and WRITE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66952</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66952</guid>
			<description>Actually, I think i read mention that ntfs read/write support is stable enough in kernel 2.6.14.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (joelito_pr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>110V is OK?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66954</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66954</guid>
			<description>hi Eugenia,<br />
<br />
Does this wonderful stuff support 110V electricity? I am in Japan, and the only electricity voltage available is 110V, not 220V as in other countries.<br />
<br />
I suppose that it is OK, as it is kind of mobility device  (?), same as laptop, which supports all kinds of power voltage (?)<br />
<br />
Thanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: 110V is OK?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?66956</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?66956</guid>
			<description>Yes it is. You will need an adapter for the different kind of plug, but the voltage is supported: from 100 to 240V.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Better Price...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67014</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67014</guid>
			<description>That is really nice, but unfortunately they dont ship it outside of US.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>All kind of TVs are supported?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67017</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67017</guid>
			<description>Eugenia,<br />
<br />
# Video Outputs:<br />
# NTSC/PAL Composite Video<br />
# S-Video<br />
# Analog YPbPr Video<br />
# SCART RGB<br />
# VGA (1024x768)<br />
# HDTV (480p, 720p, 1080i)  <br />
<br />
I have a very old TVset (produced in 199x), but I am not sure that this device supports my TV. How can I confirm that?<br />
<br />
I guess the &quot;NTSC/PAL Composite Video&quot; stands for normal/old TV?<br />
<br />
Thanks</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: All kind of TVs are supported?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67019</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67019</guid>
			<description>Yes, your TV most probably has either S-Video and/or the normal 3 AV jacks (the red, white and yellow inputs). So yes, I am sure it works.Edited 2005-11-30 07:58</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too expensive shipping fee</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67020</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67020</guid>
			<description>I just tried to order this stuff from Geeks.com to Japan, and the lowest shipping price is &quot;FedEx International Economy  $86.00&quot;. That is a crazy price!!!<br />
<br />
Anybody can recommend me a better online shop with cheaper shipping fee?<br />
<br />
Thanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Too expensive shipping fee</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67026</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67026</guid>
			<description>Please email me in person, I might be able to help out with this.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67066</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67066</guid>
			<description>It's a bloody shame that they don't support ext2 / ext3. My external harddisk now uses ext3, and I mostly use it with windows. ext2 support for windows is much better than ntfs support for linux.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (evert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Similar Product with Network Support</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67107</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67107</guid>
			<description>The MediaGate MG-35N is basically the same device but also allows you to access it via ethernet.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mediagate.co.kr/english/prod_mg35n.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediagate.co.kr/english/prod_mg35n.htm</a><br />
<br />
I currently own the 2.5&quot; version, and it plays back almost anything I throw at it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mediagate.co.kr/english/prod_mg25.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediagate.co.kr/english/prod_mg25.htm</a><br />
<br />
Here's a review of the MG-25:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.urbangiraffe.com/2005/03/03/mg25/" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbangiraffe.com/2005/03/03/mg25/</a><br />
<br />
Coolerguys.com has the 2.5&quot; version for US$99.95<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.coolerguys.com/840556020455.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolerguys.com/840556020455.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SkyLr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67133</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67133</guid>
			<description>Is there an ext2/ext3 driver for Windows XP? If so, where could I download it?<br />
<br />
I'm currently using an extra FAT32 partition to move data back and forth between Linux and Windows, but having r/w access to my Linux home folder from Windows would be so much better!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (null_pointer_us)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67167</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67167</guid>
			<description>There are 2 drivers with RW support, so you CAN use ext2 in Windows. Beware: no journalling (ext3). You can read/write to ext3 without journalling, so no problem there.<br />
<br />
I recommend Stephan:<br />
<a href="http://www.fs-driver.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fs-driver.org/</a><br />
<br />
But more mature is Matt:<br />
<a href="http://ext2fsd.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://ext2fsd.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
<br />
Matt rules with ext2fsd, which is a reasonably mature file system driver, around for much longer than Stephan Schreiber's Ext2 IFS. But using it with USB devices is sometimes a hassle.<br />
<br />
Stephan Schreiber's Ext2 IFS may do for USB Harddisks and memory sticks, and is also easier to install and configure.<br />
<br />
Stephan Schreiber: Neither different code pages nor UTF-8 encoded file names are supported. The driver always uses the current code page of Windows. The next version will support UTF-8.<br />
Matt: codepage utf8 supported (but not working?)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (evert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67176</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67176</guid>
			<description>Thanks! I installed Stephan's but still couldn't see my drives. Apparently, my ext2 partitions are in a Linux LVM partition which Windows doesn't know how to handle, so I'm back to square one. Do you any idea how to resolve this? My search on a LVM driver for Windows turned up nothing.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (null_pointer_us)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67186</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67186</guid>
			<description>I'm sorry, but I think there is no software to handle Linux LVM partitions for Windows. Bad luck. You could consider to move your linux home directory to the partition where FAT32 now resides (first, format it to ext2 and make backups). Be careful.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (evert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: no ext2 / ext3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67207</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67207</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I've &quot;misplaced&quot; my user data enough times in both Windows and Linux to steer clear of any quick fixes. The safest way is probably to wait until FC5 is released, move my /home partition out of LVM, and use the FC5 installer to select the right location for the new /home mount point.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (null_pointer_us)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Noise???</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67258</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67258</guid>
			<description>Does it have a fan?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Noise???</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67266</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67266</guid>
			<description>No, it does not have a fan. But it has holes in the alumninium base for the hard drive to &quot;breath&quot;. So, regarding noise, it all depends if your hard drive you place in it is noisy or not.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Tvisto</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?67461</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?67461</guid>
			<description>I recently purchased a Tvisto unit from one of Macpower's OEM customers. <br />
<br />
I only bought it after reading the Cnet review. I guess seeing Iomega was carrying it also helped.<br />
<br />
In the US <a href="http://www.g-technology.com/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.g-technology.com/index.cfm</a> is reselling the Mvisto version. <br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/dvdpvr/0,39030417,39188428,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/dvdpvr/0,39030417,39188428,00.htm</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.iomega-europe.com/eu/en/products/screenplay/screenplay_family_en.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.iomega-europe.com/eu/en/products/screenplay/screenplay_f...</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
Lots of good products out there.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Playing music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?68677</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?68677</guid>
			<description>Im wondering, you said &quot;I did the &quot;mistake&quot; of drag-n-dropping all my 240 music files to the &quot;Music&quot; folder and so I then experienced a very slow response&quot; <br />
<br />
does this mean 240 individual songs or 240 folders with songs in them? Would it access faster if albums were in their own folders?<br />
<br />
Also, is there anyway to sort the music collection when using the remote and tv?<br />
<br />
Thank-you</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
