<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/1308/Review_of_Unsanity_s_MacOSX_Haxies</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:38:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>To get rid of shadows</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Maybe you should get ShadowKiller, free from Unsanity. So you wouldn't have to live with shade... I personally love shading on KDE, and wonder why some people don't (yeah, yeah, personal preference)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Anyway</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Maybe I'm not the only one, but I find Aqua quite... well, not my taste. I found this: <a href="http://conundrumsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://conundrumsoft.com</a>. Maybe Eugenia can review it? I'm don't have OS X</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>&amp;quot;one problem&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;One problem I had with th... (snip) I could get the foremost window with no shadows, but not the rest.<br />
And each time I was visiting the shadow settings panel, the panel had lost its settings.<br />
But other than that, the haxie works well (except some crashes of the pref panel if I uncheck the &quot;WindowShadeX Enabled&quot; option)&quot;<br />
<br />
Sounds more like 3 serious bugs than 1 problem.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>10.2</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>10.2 is going to have replacements for all this functionality. Save your $7.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2002 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Duality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>In response to rajan's...<br />
<br />
No need for a proper review from Eugenia, here it is:<br />
<br />
Duality is neat.  There are a bunch of them here: <a href="http://www.resexcellence.com/themes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.resexcellence.com/themes/</a><br />
<br />
Duality worked fine for me.  No stability issues.  Duality and MetamorphX replace UI resources, rather than replacing drawing routines like Kaleidescope does.  You can get some really nice themes for Duality, but many are just cheesy, as with all themes.  <br />
<br />
Personally, I was a big fan of Unlined Aqua in graphite mode.  Some of them are really awkward to use, like the Platinum theme. <br />
<br />
And for you sick bastards, there are even two Luna themes.   <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2002 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Duality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>Duality worked fine for me. No stability issues. Duality and MetamorphX replace UI resources, rather than replacing drawing routines like Kaleidescope does. You can get some really nice themes for Duality, but many are just cheesy, as with all themes. </i><br />
<br />
I'm finding however a theme that is a crisp as QNX or BeOS...<br />
<br />
<i>And for you sick bastards, there are even two Luna themes. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> </i><br />
<br />
If I were to choose between Luna and Aqua, Luna would win hands down (sorry).</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 06:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Duality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>:And for you sick bastards, there are even two Luna themes. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  <br />
<br />
If I were to choose between Luna and Aqua, Luna would win hands down (sorry).<br />
<br />
I actually prefer the 'watercolour' visual style for XP (i.e. the one that's based on the pre-luna betas appearance)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>I actually prefer the 'watercolour' visual style for XP (i.e. the one that's based on the pre-luna betas appearance)</i><br />
<br />
I like that, and used it for a very long time on KDE 3.0 until I got bored of it. The reason why Microsoft dumped that and went for Luna is that it has hired outside people to do the look&amp;feel stuff of the OS.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
