http://www.osnews.com/story/13495/IBM_Delivers_Free_Version_of_Database Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Thu, 23 May 2013 18:38:06 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif http://www.osnews.com http://www.osnews.com/thread?90879 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90879 The database, while "limited", isn't THAT limited, particularly compared to Oracle. The 4GB disk limit for Oracle is, I think, rather crippling.

Limiting DB2 to just smaller servers without the disk limitation makes it a spectacular candidate for departmental and small-mid size back office databases.

And it should run fine on Windows, where it will be a solid competitor to SQL Server.

Now, if they'd only get a Solaris port going. Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:52:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (whartung) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90894 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90894 If they got a Solaris port they'd be even farther ahead of Oracle which only has Linux and Windows versions of Oracle XE. Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:17:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (kiz01) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90896 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90896 With competition like this, maybe Oracle will loosen up its restrictions. Unlimited disk space would give Oracle XE a LOT more potential. Of course, maybe that's what Oracle is afraid of. After all, they want users to start paying eventually. Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:20:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (kiz01) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90914 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90914 I know that these are Windows versions, but I know that Oracle makes a linux version - what are the posibilities of a Mac version coming out? In years past Apple had no "big boy" server solution, but now with the Xserves (hopefully they will be moving to intel SOON), it is quite conceivable that people will start using OS X server with Xserves more and more Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:59:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (mini-me) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90916 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90916 Is this version enough to use Lotus Notes with it or does one still have to buy DB2 CommonStore?

And second question would be if first one is answered "No, you still have to buy...". Does buying CommonStore mean you have to buy DB2 too? Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:01:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (somebody) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90968 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90968 Users (meaning: enterprises) will pay regardless of the availability of a free version. Even if it had no restrictions at all. Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:08:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (LB06) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90976 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90976 Why do you need a Mac Version?
Have you checked out Postgres lately?
It's a very easy install, the SQL code is very close to ORacle and DB2, with full ACID compliance,
and it's SMP aware, and FREE.

Apple should use this as the backend for FileMaker! Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:17:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (MikeekiM) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?90999 http://www.osnews.com/thread?90999 If you build a system around this DB and then IBM stops offering DB2 for free, you are going to have to pay up or never upgrade.

Just something to think about... Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:44:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (setuid_w00t) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?91143 http://www.osnews.com/thread?91143 Why would they do that? The same thing can be said for the free versions of Oracle and SQL Server.

If their goal of doing this is to respond to MS/Oracle's free databases, then they'll probably only pull the plug when Oracle and MS do so. Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:26:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (ChiliJ) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?91164 http://www.osnews.com/thread?91164 i wish they'd do free clients for the full version of db2.

i'm currently trying to figure out how to connect to an aix db2 server from a solaris client using perl, but we don't have the client libraries for solaris!

would the client that comes for free (on athlon64 linux) be able to connect to the commercial server on aix? Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:15:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (simo) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?91226 http://www.osnews.com/thread?91226 The words free version makes me say, "whoa", sounds like a limited time offer. Oracle released a free linux version and now it's nowhere in sight. Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:48:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Sphinx) Comments