<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/14065/Firefox_ODFReader_Extension</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:39:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106840</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106840</guid>
			<description>Firefox prompts what to do, I select &quot;Open with Firefox&quot; and it says it downloaded the .odt file on the desktop, but there's nothing. I expected Firefox would open it just like an Acrobat file, inside the browser.<br />
<br />
I checked, the ODF extention is indeed enable. Dunno...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Joe User)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>About the plugin</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106843</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106843</guid>
			<description>I think it would make more sense that installing OpenOffice.org installs a plugin to each browser installed on the system, the same way as Real Player or Acrobat do. Why a plugin only for Firefox?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Joe User)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106856</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106856</guid>
			<description>Well it doesn't work for me.<br />
<br />
It just opens a tab with nothing in it.Edited 2006-03-22 20:55</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dylansmrjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106865</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106865</guid>
			<description>&quot;Well it doesn't work for me. &quot;<br />
<br />
Then I guess the whole project's worthless, then...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kick The Donkey)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106873</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106873</guid>
			<description>No, of course not. It's still in very early stage, and I don't doubt it's going to be much better. I'm all for an ODF-plugin to browsers.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dylansmrjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106943</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106943</guid>
			<description>Some users found that you can only read local ODT files (file://), but cannot read files on remote server (http://). <br />
<br />
In my case, I can also read local files only with this extension. It could be a bug in the MIME setting or something.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zero0w)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106949</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106949</guid>
			<description>Works fine here, remote server.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?106955</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?106955</guid>
			<description>I double-checked it, by choosing firefox (instead of OOo2 Writer) to open *.odt files from remote server. It works! Thanks for the confirmation.<br />
<br />
Here, you can try to view some of the ODT files at OpenOffice.org HOWTO documentation page (where certain docs are written in ODT):<br />
<br />
<a href="http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zero0w)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: About the plugin</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?107044</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?107044</guid>
			<description>I am guessing that in the long term, thats the aim of the project. However, at present they are only testing out the plugin thus it would make sense to release the plugin for Firefox as most OO users probably use Firefox as well (more so than IE).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wintermute)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: About the plugin</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?107060</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?107060</guid>
			<description><i>I think it would make more sense that installing OpenOffice.org installs a plugin to each browser installed on the system, the same way as Real Player or Acrobat do.</i><br />
<br />
If I need to view a ODF doc online, I certainly would not want a &quot;plugin&quot; that simply loads OOo Writer into a tab.  A small 9 KB Firefox extension aint a bad idea though...<br />
<br />
<i>Why a plugin only for Firefox?</i><br />
<br />
Someone has to be the first.  If not Mozilla, then who were you expecting?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lettherebemorelight)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Doesn't work here</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?107067</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?107067</guid>
			<description>Thanks god you didn't try Linux 0.01 and told that to Linus <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rodrigo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No reason for this</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?107130</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?107130</guid>
			<description>Just make sure you know the hidden treasure of OOo2 options (hint: enable Mozilla Plugin)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zeppelin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No reason for this</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?107156</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?107156</guid>
			<description>If you have OOo installed, then sure, you can view it. <br />
<br />
But a lot of people who don't have OOo installed but just want to view an ODF document; or for those who are on dial-up, then this small plugin will make their life easier.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zero0w)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
