<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/14936/Centos_4_3_Server_Quick_Configuration_Guide</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:19:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>SME sever</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?135127</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?135127</guid>
			<description>If you want to have a proper server with CentOS, one easy way is to use SME server : <a href="http://contribs.org/modules/news/" rel="nofollow">http://contribs.org/modules/news/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lezard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: SME sever</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?135133</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?135133</guid>
			<description>Why would you want to use something as old and outdated as that? Its based on RH 7.3. That means no support for most modern hardware.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TechGeek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: SME sever</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?135139</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?135139</guid>
			<description>The latest one is based on CentOS 4.2 (not really outdated...)<br />
I know it is still labelled as release candidate, but it is really stable and quite bug-free.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lezard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>CentOS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?135245</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?135245</guid>
			<description>Totally rocks, actually smoother more complete install on a linux hating dell latitude C640 laptop than debian etch. Very, very stable and sweet, kudos for a nice job to the centos team.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sphinx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bad link</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?135619</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?135619</guid>
			<description>All I could read in linked page was:<br />
<br />
<br />
           Page not found</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Punktyras)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
