<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/14955/Comparison_of_BSD_Live_CDs</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:44:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>The best way to call ppl :)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135530</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135530</guid>
			<description>I consider Live CD's or DVD's an excellent choise to show someone a new OS. For example, in the other day i wanted to show to a friend of mine the Kubuntu distro, but i currently have Windows XP installed on my system and i didn't want to install it on VMWare, so i simply downloaded a Live Kubuntu CD an run it on my Athlon 64.<br />
It's a great way to try software and should be massivly suported by all OS manufactors. Even microsoft should have it.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Claymore)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A Little Unclear</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135550</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135550</guid>
			<description>I enjoy the writing as it does bring up some neat livecd's made with *BSD bases, but the author was a bit unclear as to what type of problems they had booting were. One of the CD's apparently just locked up on boot, so that was probably some form of a hardware kernel panic, but otherwise it's unclear as to exactly what went wrong. There may have been boot-time arguments to resolve certain issues. I'm not saying I'm 100% positive that this was the case, but it just didn't seem to clear as to what those issues were.<br />
<br />
Either way, the writing is nice and it shows the people the potential power behind BSD type systems.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dswain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wish it was a bit more extensive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135582</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135582</guid>
			<description>But nice to see the options side by side. I'd like to see more distro reviews like that. Any bias the reviewer might have towards a particular system will be controlled that way, since you can't praise 5 different systems into the heavens without sounding suspicious.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too short...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135620</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135620</guid>
			<description>...reviews were too short.  But it was nice to see the comparison.  NetBSD is my favorite.  In fact I am downloading the CD even as we speak.  I miss having a computer that runs NetBSD (or BeOS for that matter).<br />
<br />
I don't think the NetBSD crew has ironed out the Intel Mac bootstrap yet, but I figure I can give it a shot.  <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
