<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/14961/Alternative_OS_Contest_Deadline_Extended_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:48:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135760</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135760</guid>
			<description>Nobody wrote anything?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (watchingher)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135763</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135763</guid>
			<description>Oh they did, however, we got requests the timespan was too short. Hence, the extension.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>AROS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135765</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135765</guid>
			<description>Anyone doing an AROS write-up?Edited 2006-06-21 17:10</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (transami)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135767</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135767</guid>
			<description>I have four entries already, and several requests to extend the deadline.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Damn you</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135778</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135778</guid>
			<description>That's too long! Just a week will do! I had mine almost finished, and now what am I supposed to do for a month? :/<br />
I've got a detailed GEOS review with video demonstration and a great writeup.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135782</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135782</guid>
			<description>Thom,<br />
  Maybe you should expand the collection of OSes to include say OpenBSD for instance. Even though it is Unix based, we never see many articles on this OS. Unlike Linux/FreeBSD/Mac which are dime a dozen. And how about BeOS? And FreeDOS?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jbalmer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135784</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135784</guid>
			<description>BSD is too common. BeOS and FreeDOS are certainly eligible. What made you think otherwise?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This is good</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135803</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135803</guid>
			<description>I didn't have time to write up anything (doing studies). Now I can get it done <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cefarix)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135805</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135805</guid>
			<description>If you're interested in OpenBSD, try <a href="http://undeadly.org" rel="nofollow">http://undeadly.org</a>.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135808</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135808</guid>
			<description>The site looks good. Thanks for the link.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jbalmer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: What happened?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135811</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135811</guid>
			<description>BeOS and FreeDOS are certainly eligible. What made you think otherwise?<br />
<br />
I didn't find it in the list... oh you have written in the end &quot;and any other unique and interesting OS!&quot;.. . never mind.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jbalmer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Damn you</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135813</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135813</guid>
			<description>That's too long! Just a week will do! I had mine almost finished, and now what am I supposed to do for a month? :/<br />
I've got a detailed GEOS review with video demonstration and a great writeup.<br />
<br />
I'm definitely looking forward to your review, but I'm glad for the extension as now I have time to participate as well. I have had a crazy work schedule where I had to work over 80 hours in the past seven days. I was not one of the requestors for an extension, but I am very excited to have the opportunity to take part.<br />
<br />
I'm debating between GNU/HURD, ReactOS, and Minix. Is there any reason why any of those wouldn't be viable befor I make my final decision?<br />
<br />
Thanks for the extension,<br />
<br />
Sean</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sean Parsons)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Damn you</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135817</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135817</guid>
			<description>All three are acceptable entries.  I'd especially like to see a comprehensive review of Minix AND one of ReactOS.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Netware</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135818</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135818</guid>
			<description>How about Netware?  It's not a desktop OS, but is an OS of some type.  <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (IanSVT)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Please someone - latest version of eComStation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135821</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135821</guid>
			<description>This isn't a joke. I'm hoping that someone does a good detailed review of ecomstation. Used to be known as OS/2.<br />
<br />
1) I don't have time.<br />
2) I don't currently have any computers that run it (currently all G4 Macs)<br />
3) I want to eventally be able to dual boot between Mac OS X, eComStation, and Haiku on an intel Mac when I get it later this year.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sabon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Netware</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135822</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135822</guid>
			<description>I don't know.  Netware is pretty much dead and was extremely mainstream in its day, not very &quot;alternative.&quot;<br />
<br />
However, I suppose if someone really wanted to get into the nitty gritty of Netware 6.5: eDirectory, NWAdmin, Netware's file permissions, etc, I'd accept it, mainly because not enough of the IT people in the world today experienced Netware (5+ with IP, naturally) or know what it was about.  <br />
<br />
Netware was a GREAT NOS.  If you want to write about it, we'll take it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135826</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135826</guid>
			<description>Now I can consider doing one too...although 14 july seems a bit too much time to give.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LoseThos</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135833</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135833</guid>
			<description>I'm disappointed because I'm impatient.  I hope we can submit better ones if we already submitted.  <br />
<br />
If anybody else wants to document a radically different OS, try <a href="http://www.losethos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.losethos.com</a><br />
<br />
Jeez, by July 14, stuff might be out-dated.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TDavis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wishlist...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135835</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135835</guid>
			<description>I don't have time to do a review myself, but I'd love to see the following done in-depth:<br />
<br />
Unununium (<a href="http://unununium.org" rel="nofollow">http://unununium.org</a>)<br />
Coyotos (<a href="http://coyotos.org" rel="nofollow">http://coyotos.org</a>)<br />
FMI/OS (<a href="http://wiki.ocgnet.org:8080/FMIOS" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.ocgnet.org:8080/FMIOS</a>)<br />
TinyOS (<a href="http://tinyos.net" rel="nofollow">http://tinyos.net</a>)<br />
<br />
And, as a desktop experience, I'd love to see a review of RiscOS too (<a href="http://riscos.com" rel="nofollow">http://riscos.com</a>) <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (koen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Two more</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135848</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135848</guid>
			<description>Native version of two usaually hosted OS:<br />
<br />
ETH Oberon (<a href="http://www.oberon.ethz.ch/native/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oberon.ethz.ch/native/</a>)<br />
SqueakNOS (<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/squeaknos/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/squeaknos/</a>)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BrickCaster)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wishlist...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135853</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135853</guid>
			<description>You can't review Unununium (usability of bash?), unless you want to go into a technical analysis of what they're trying to achieve.<br />
<br />
Hmm, that's not such a bad idea actually.<br />
<br />
Edit: or is it?Edited 2006-06-21 21:35</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Unununium</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135857</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135857</guid>
			<description>unununium is, by far, the most odd operating system i've ever seen <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (koen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: This is good</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135861</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135861</guid>
			<description>Same here, even if I was sure I wanted to try this contest the old schedule wouldn't have allowed me the time because I'm still writing exams.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Celerate)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: This is good</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135865</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135865</guid>
			<description>Sorry about the double post folks, it's hard to find an ISP that works up here in Yellowknife. FireFox said OSNews.com was unreachable and I had to refresh a few times just to end up with this.<br />
<br />
As a feature request, perhaps the site admin could attach a unique tag to each post, and stop two posts with the same tag from being sent within five minutes of each other.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Celerate)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Lists of alternative OSes</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135903</guid>
			<description>If you're looking for non-standard OSes to review you might want to try both of these urls:<br />
<a href="http://www.osdev.org/wiki/index.php/Projects" rel="nofollow">http://www.osdev.org/wiki/index.php/Projects</a><br />
<a href="http://www.osdev.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.osdev.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=2</a><br />
<br />
Many of them aren't more then a boot sector but there are a couple of interesting ones.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (chase@osdev)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: AROS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135938</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135938</guid>
			<description>Yes.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mikesum32)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yey - extension</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?135944</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?135944</guid>
			<description>I wouldn't have time to write about QNX.  Now I can.<br />
<br />
I hope there are lots of quality submissions in the end.  Looking forward to reading them.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flav2000)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>So now i can submit a better version?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?136169</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?136169</guid>
			<description>Hi,<br />
<br />
So, I did submitted a fast version of my article on 21.<br />
It was the one for SOLAR OS.<br />
This GUI OS can be found at www.oby.ro if others want to take a ride.<br />
<br />
Now, I do have a question:<br />
-Is it OK to improve it and eventually submit again a better version of the same article? <br />
(I was in  a hurry to meet the expected deadline...)<br />
<br />
Well, with so much extra time I could even improve the OS in the meanwhile <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2006-06-22 22:40</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bogdan_ontanu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
