<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/15136/FreeBSD_Development_Projects_Summary</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:29:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141657</guid>
			<description>alan cox is listed for VM improvements....<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
-Nex6</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Nex6)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>jail</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141661</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141661</guid>
			<description>It's great to hear that jail system is actively developed. Currently it doesn't support limits. This situation forced me to search for another operating system-level virtualization.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Abaddon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141664</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141664</guid>
			<description>Actually, FreeBSD's Alan (L.) Cox is not the same person as Linux's Alan Cox.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (danieldk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sweet</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141667</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141667</guid>
			<description>ARM,USB,and DTRACE I can't wait <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Chezz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>USB</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141676</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141676</guid>
			<description>I heard that FreeBSD had some problems auto mounting USB drives, would this project eliminate this problem?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Excel Hearts Choi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>what about...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141682</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141682</guid>
			<description>...HAL?  The last I heard, FreeBSD was working hard on porting the Linux-specific parts of HAL in order to provide feature parity on GNOME.  How is this coming along?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (butters)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: what about...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141721</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141721</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/hal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/hal/</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/hal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/hal...</a> <br />
<br />
marcus and jylefort have done a lot of work. It will be in ports tree when GNOME 2.16 releases. :-) If you can't wait, then use MC ports that have GNOME 2.15.x.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mezz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Giving up KSE?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141844</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141844</guid>
			<description>I hope not; I was last using it in 6.1, and the responsiveness was great IMHO - I hope its just a rumour.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Giving up KSE?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?141997</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?141997</guid>
			<description>Any new benchmarks on lipthread versus libpthread?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Don T. Bothers)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
