Mono Debate Heats up – Again

The Mono debate over on the GNOME desktop developer mailing list is heating up again. Philip Van Hoof makes a compelling argument about the need for GNOME decision makers to take into consideration future developers and the over-reliance of C and GObject in GNOME. At what point does a general-purpose, high level framework and runtime become a necessity for GNOME?

131 Comments

  1. 2006-07-18 11:19 pm
    • 2006-07-19 9:03 am
      • 2006-07-19 12:10 pm
        • 2006-07-19 6:46 pm
      • 2006-07-19 4:41 pm
        • 2006-07-19 6:48 pm
  2. 2006-07-18 11:28 pm
    • 2006-07-18 11:30 pm
      • 2006-07-18 11:33 pm
      • 2006-07-18 11:39 pm
        • 2006-07-18 11:40 pm
          • 2006-07-18 11:44 pm
          • 2006-07-18 11:51 pm
          • 2006-07-19 12:03 am
        • 2006-07-19 7:42 am
      • 2006-07-19 4:46 pm
    • 2006-07-19 6:15 am
      • 2006-07-19 8:37 am
        • 2006-07-19 12:06 pm
    • 2006-07-19 5:35 pm
      • 2006-07-19 7:46 pm
        • 2006-07-19 8:42 pm
          • 2006-07-20 3:21 am
        • 2006-07-19 9:41 pm
      • 2006-07-19 10:31 pm
  3. 2006-07-18 11:30 pm
  4. 2006-07-18 11:41 pm
    • 2006-07-19 5:41 am
      • 2006-07-19 11:51 am
      • 2006-07-19 12:18 pm
  5. 2006-07-18 11:46 pm
  6. 2006-07-18 11:57 pm
  7. 2006-07-19 12:06 am
    • 2006-07-19 12:21 am
      • 2006-07-19 12:30 am
  8. 2006-07-19 12:27 am
    • 2006-07-19 1:07 am
    • 2006-07-19 2:33 pm
  9. 2006-07-19 12:35 am
    • 2006-07-19 1:08 am
    • 2006-07-19 2:03 am
      • 2006-07-19 4:31 pm
  10. 2006-07-19 12:37 am
    • 2006-07-19 1:04 am
    • 2006-07-19 1:36 am
  11. 2006-07-19 1:02 am
  12. 2006-07-19 1:21 am
    • 2006-07-19 1:30 am
  13. 2006-07-19 1:37 am
    • 2006-07-19 12:34 pm
      • 2006-07-19 12:48 pm
      • 2006-07-19 1:35 pm
        • 2006-07-19 2:10 pm
          • 2006-07-19 3:11 pm
          • 2006-07-19 4:03 pm
      • 2006-07-19 7:43 pm
        • 2006-07-20 12:00 pm
      • 2006-07-19 8:02 pm
    • 2006-07-19 2:43 pm
  14. 2006-07-19 1:46 am
    • 2006-07-19 6:48 am
      • 2006-07-19 8:06 am
      • 2006-07-19 9:33 am
        • 2006-07-19 10:53 am
          • 2006-07-19 11:35 am
        • 2006-07-19 11:58 am
          • 2006-07-19 5:11 pm
        • 2006-07-19 1:44 pm
  15. 2006-07-19 1:57 am
  16. 2006-07-19 2:21 am
    • 2006-07-19 6:20 pm
    • 2006-07-19 9:56 pm
      • 2006-07-19 10:13 pm
  17. 2006-07-19 3:00 am
    • 2006-07-19 4:21 am
      • 2006-07-19 7:21 am
        • 2006-07-19 11:30 am
  18. 2006-07-19 3:57 am
  19. 2006-07-19 4:00 am
    • 2006-07-19 7:03 am
    • 2006-07-19 10:11 am
    • 2006-07-19 4:48 pm
  20. 2006-07-19 4:30 am
  21. 2006-07-19 8:05 am
    • 2006-07-19 12:11 pm
      • 2006-07-19 12:44 pm
        • 2006-07-19 1:54 pm
  22. 2006-07-19 9:17 am
    • 2006-07-19 10:40 am
  23. 2006-07-19 9:37 am
    • 2006-07-19 2:14 pm
    • 2006-07-19 2:16 pm
  24. 2006-07-19 10:15 am
  25. 2006-07-19 10:51 am
  26. 2006-07-19 10:52 am
  27. 2006-07-19 10:55 am
  28. 2006-07-19 10:58 am
  29. 2006-07-19 11:00 am
  30. 2006-07-19 11:04 am
  31. 2006-07-19 11:13 am
  32. 2006-07-19 11:30 am
  33. 2006-07-19 12:08 pm
  34. 2006-07-19 12:45 pm
    • 2006-07-20 6:25 pm
  35. 2006-07-19 1:16 pm
  36. 2006-07-19 1:52 pm
  37. 2006-07-19 2:31 pm
  38. 2006-07-19 2:48 pm
    • 2006-07-19 3:35 pm
      • 2006-07-19 4:35 pm
  39. 2006-07-19 4:55 pm
    • 2006-07-19 9:42 pm
      • 2006-07-19 9:57 pm
        • 2006-07-19 11:19 pm
        • 2006-07-20 6:04 am
  40. 2006-07-19 5:13 pm
    • 2006-07-19 5:21 pm
      • 2006-07-19 5:29 pm
        • 2006-07-19 7:37 pm
          • 2006-07-19 8:05 pm
  41. 2006-07-19 5:26 pm
  42. 2006-07-19 5:53 pm
    • 2006-07-19 7:57 pm
  43. 2006-07-19 6:53 pm
  44. 2006-07-19 7:11 pm
  45. 2006-07-19 9:52 pm
  46. 2006-07-19 11:04 pm
    • 2006-07-20 3:37 am
  47. 2006-07-20 11:39 pm
  48. 2006-07-21 10:06 am