<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/15628/Sysjail_1_0_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:28:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Great idea</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156802</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156802</guid>
			<description>I'll have to check it out on NetBSD i386.  Already, work with xen has meant the porting of netbsd kerneld as dom0 as well as domU.  But for small applications, a systrace based jail may be able to get the job done plus I like the system control and logging it provides.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (libray)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
