<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/15659/Interview_Guy_Martin_of_Motorola_s_Linux_Division</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:41:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>WIFI!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156825</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156825</guid>
			<description>Moto if you read this, when will we finally see a MING like phone with WIFI? (of course, actually releasing a LInux SDK as opposed to J2ME would help, too)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bimbo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: WIFI!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156836</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156836</guid>
			<description>Personally, I am more dissapointed that the Ming-A1200 doesn't have EDGE rather than WiFi. If it had EDGE, then WiFi would have been my feature request too.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i wonder...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156837</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156837</guid>
			<description>will razr maxx run linux when shipped to europe?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: i wonder...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156840</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156840</guid>
			<description>No, this phone runs the old Motorola inhouse embedded OS. Linux phones supposedly will appear in more models through Motorola starting next year.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>bitpim</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156846</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156846</guid>
			<description>Better support for Bitpim would be a plus too!  I'd have bought a RAZR last time around if I knew that bitpim would work with it.<br />
<br />
(It does now, but I have a phone)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MattPie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>And I quote...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156872</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156872</guid>
			<description>Huh.  Part of his answers are word-for-word identical to text found on <a href="https://opensource.motorola.com/sf/go/wiki1064" rel="nofollow">https://opensource.motorola.com/sf/go/wiki1064</a><br />
<br />
That's weird.  Any idea which came first?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anon-anon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: And I quote...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156875</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156875</guid>
			<description>Probably the wiki.Edited 2006-08-29 20:47</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gyu??</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156881</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156881</guid>
			<description>Just noticed -- looks like the web folks spelled this gentleman's name wrong in the responses...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (OSNewbie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: WIFI!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?156887</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?156887</guid>
			<description>Personally, I am more dissapointed that the Ming-A1200 doesn't have EDGE .<br />
<br />
I was talking with a Moto engineer earlier this year, and asked if there would be a GSM version of the Moto Q anytime soon.  Said engineer laughed and replied that the question was a popular one, but nobody would buy it because it would be very slow at downloading email and webpages.  When I pressed a little further, the engineer admitted that Moto is (still) having trouble developing a good EDGE implementation.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jonnycat26)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: i wonder...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157001</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157001</guid>
			<description>heh, guess its sonyericsson Z710 for this guy then.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Unfortunate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157092</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157092</guid>
			<description>This feels more like a questionnaire that was filled out by the public relations department of Motorola than an actual interview. Some of these questions you also asked them numerous times previously, see <a href="http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=15040" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=15040</a> yet now that they are answering them you are not going deeper into the matter with them (at least not visibly). Which is unfortunate also since you seem really frustrated with them in that article.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (XemonerdX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Unfortunate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157116</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157116</guid>
			<description>Of course, I very much agree. Motorola just doesn't get how to do proper interviews, especially for tech-oriented sites.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
