<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/15698/Review_Rockbox_-_The_Open_Source_Jukebox_Firmware</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:57:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Rockbox</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157953</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157953</guid>
			<description>Ugly or what?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Makro)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>For those who have used it ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157955</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157955</guid>
			<description>I skimmed through the article, and noticed that they have added iPod support since the last time I looked at it. Does mean that I'd be able to use the iPod as a UMS device? If this is the case, and since Rockbox has bookmarks (for audiobooks), that would make the iPod much more attractive to me <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2006-09-01 16:19</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WorknMan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Rockbox</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157962</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157962</guid>
			<description>the default theme is, but the rest of the screenshots with the &quot;desert theme&quot; are nice and not visualy clutered, leaving a lot of room to display information. Everything is not about graphisms, anyway. And the point of rockbox is not to have the best good looking firmware, but to add a lot of features that the original firmware doesn't have. I used on my old archos, and what they have achieved is quiet amazing.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cyrilleberger)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>nano</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157973</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157973</guid>
			<description>I had rockbox on my ipod nano.  It was pretty slick, looking very good with some third party skins.  The controls were a bit annoying tho.  It would skip on certain high bitrate MP3.  The battery lasted about half the time it did with the original firmware.<br />
<br />
Still, once I installed it, I never went back.  You can also have Doom on rockbox, just like on ipodlinux. 1337!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (yanik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?157985</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?157985</guid>
			<description>It comes to my mind that this would not be possible if the iPod had a DRM firmware in its hardware.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mitarai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: For those who have used it ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?158008</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?158008</guid>
			<description>yes, that is the number 1 reason i use it on my Nano.<br />
<br />
The main complain i have so far, is that they change the way the clickwheel works.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kwanbis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Batterylife</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?158076</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?158076</guid>
			<description>Is batterylife on all models shorter? Because this definitely interests me...if I don't lose half the playingtime.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: nano</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?158078</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?158078</guid>
			<description>You can have Doom, sort of, but its not that easy to play cause of the low resolution. The controls can get annoying (at least on my iRiver) and if you play for long periods your eyes start to hurt (cause of the small screen). <br />
<br />
I would really call it playable.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wintermute)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
