<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/15908/SGI_To_Emerge_From_Bankruptcy_Cocoon</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:01:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Best of luck SGI</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?164016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?164016</guid>
			<description>May people be able to enjoy your pretty purple boxes once again!<br />
<br />
(that doesn't sound quite right :x)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mrcool)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Best of luck SGI</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?164062</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?164062</guid>
			<description>Maybe they'll come with purple pills too?  Seriously though, seems to me the high end 3d workstation market that SGI filled years ago is no longer so necessary.  A cheap pc can do the same, only better, now.<br />
<br />
I see on their home page they are marketing for things like celular simulations and HIV molecules.  Okay that's really cool stuff but seems pretty niche to me.  Either way I hope SGI sticks around.  Good luck SGI.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jjmckay)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Best of luck SGI</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?164190</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?164190</guid>
			<description>True; they need to pull finger; am I the *only* person who see's potential in SGI embracing OpenSolaris, working with Sun, and releasing a 512 way Itanium Monster running OpenSolaris and Oracle? how about the same machiner running SAP or Websphere.<br />
<br />
The possibilities are infinate, the sad part is, they've hell bent on this 'niche with Linux' stratergy; it didn't work the first time and I doubt it'll work the second time around.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A nice addition for Apple?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?164362</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?164362</guid>
			<description>I'd hate to see SGI go.  They've done too much for the workstation market.  Unfortunately, they extended themselves too far.<br />
<br />
If they were to merge with Apple, they'd have a better chance because Apple's financial group is the strongest of all computer companies.<br />
<br />
They'd both gain in the sharing of UNIX technologies and Apple would benefit from high performance computing and SGI would benefit in ease of use.<br />
<br />
Apple has been searching markets where SGI has already been and their combination would end up with a product line from inexpensive desktop to supercomputer.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
