<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16138/Interview_Gael_Duval</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:57:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Ulteo over modified VNC clients?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170765</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170765</guid>
			<description>(gone)Edited 2006-10-11 15:36</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (daniel_iversen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>not very informative</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170766</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170766</guid>
			<description>He really didn't say much about what sets Ulteo apart from Kubuntu other than the fact that it will apparently have non-KDE software included.  Hopefully there will be some more information what will differentiate it (if anything) in the near future.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Flatline)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Intriguing...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170771</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170771</guid>
			<description>Though I'll stay with Kubuntu for now.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Punktyras)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>??</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170774</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170774</guid>
			<description>I don't see the point. This looks a lot like a thin client based distro, one more.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (!dev!null)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ??</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170782</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170782</guid>
			<description>Actually, Gael came out and said that this is *not* going to be a thin-client distribution.  It will be much closer to Ubuntu, Mandriva, etc.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Flatline)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Friendly request</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170831</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170831</guid>
			<description>If a product is discussed that presumably not everyone knows about, could a simple description of say, a line long, be included in the summary?<br />
<br />
Saves having to click to another story from where we have to click to yet another page.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Friendly request</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170880</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170880</guid>
			<description>Saves having to click to another story from where we have to click to yet another page.<br />
<br />
But then you will miss seeing all the ads...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TownDrunk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?170972</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?170972</guid>
			<description>He had an opportunity to convince us and to tell us what makes Ulteo different. He didn't.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Joe User)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171049</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171049</guid>
			<description>If Ulteo does do something different, then it'll probably be ported or implemented in other Linux distros shortly after anyway.<br />
<br />
At the end of the day, it'll be yet another slightly incompatible &quot;yawn&quot;, to further confuse people considering using &quot;Linux&quot; and annoy developers who are trying to maintain (already large) auto-configure scripts.<br />
<br />
Did I mention I can predict the future? In the year 2020 the number of people using each OS for desktop and server purposes will go something like this:<br />
<br />
Windows, 70%<br />
OS X, 20%<br />
Misc BSD, almost none<br />
Solarix, almost none<br />
Ulteo, almost none<br />
Redhat, almost none<br />
Gentoo, almost none<br />
Kubuntu/Ubunto, almost none<br />
Mandriva, almost none<br />
Debain, almost none<br />
Knoppix, almost none<br />
Slackware, almost none<br />
Yellog Dog, almost none<br />
Fedora, almost none<br />
Other (misc. alternative), almost none<br />
<br />
Of course I may be wrong - one day these fools might actually start thinking and we might see something like this instead:<br />
<br />
Standard Linux, 55%<br />
Windows, 30%<br />
OS X, 10%<br />
Misc BSD, almost none<br />
Solarix, almost none<br />
Other (misc. alternative), almost none<br />
<br />
I guess that's one of the &quot;5 freedoms&quot; though - everyone is free to turn it into a fragmented mess.... :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Brendan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171187</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171187</guid>
			<description>How do you propose this &quot;Standard Linux&quot; come about?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (alucinor)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171188</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171188</guid>
			<description>I should mention that by 2020, the number of users on Indian and Chinese Linux-based OSes will probably outnumber those who can afford OSX or whatever OS Apple is releasing (if any, since it is a business, not a science/tool) at that time.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (alucinor)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Did I miss something?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171198</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171198</guid>
			<description>&quot;Kubuntu has also turned into the 'de-facto' standard KDE distribution.&quot;<br />
<br />
From where do you guys have this information? Your imagination? Please don't post such nonsense if you cannot verify it.<br />
<br />
PS: Brendan, it is Solaris, not Solarix. <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  Ad I doubt that RedHat will loose its quite significant market share in the server and corporate desktop market anytime soon. They are an established company, even more than Mac that lost quite a lot of its business customers during the last years.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (arctic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sounds like the big difference...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171202</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171202</guid>
			<description>Is software installation.  Based on this interview and others, it sounds like Gael wants to (FINALLY) make a Linux distro with Windows-like installation procedure so that anyone can pick it up and use it without having to understand what makes Linux different.  I wouldn't underestimate this man.  You must remember that he took plain old Red Hat and made it into a much more consumer-friendly OS, and in fact Mandrake was the very first distro to do so successfully (seeing as Corel ended up leaving the marketplace for quite a few years before Xandros was released based on their code).Edited 2006-10-12 19:52</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moochman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
