<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16160/Review_SupportPlus_Sorell_SV-10_PMP</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:27:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Price?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171254</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171254</guid>
			<description>What is the price on this? When I first followed the link to geeks.com it listed it as $129, when I reloaded the page it had jumped to $199. And the review says it is &quot;selling at the low price of $150&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (D.Elfman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Price?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171258</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171258</guid>
			<description>If you click the link on the geeks.com mainpage, it says $149 - if you use the &quot;secret savings code&quot; of &quot;GEEKPLUS&quot; - see here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.geeks.com/pix/2006/GEEKPLUSlanding.html?cpc=HPM" rel="nofollow">http://www.geeks.com/pix/2006/GEEKPLUSlanding.html?cpc=HPM</a> <br />
<br />
otherwise it's currently listed at $199...<br />
<br />
I didn't see the $129 number - maybe that's a &quot;strip model&quot; ?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Price?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171260</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171260</guid>
			<description>Yes, they were having problems with their system. The normal price is $199. Then they put the item on &quot;Special of the day&quot; and it showed on the front page as $149 but when you clicked through to the product page it was $130. I alerted them about this and they changed the price.  While the &quot;special&quot; is set to $149, it's safe to assume that most people will end up in this page in the next few hours or days will find the item at the normal price at $199.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>screen resolution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171263</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171263</guid>
			<description>If the screen is truly 320x240 - they should probably change their advertisements to specify this.  It clearly states on that link above and in the product specs that it has a &quot;Huge 3.5-inch LCD display with 640 x 480 resolution&quot;<br />
<br />
This is a fairly significant overstatement IMO.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: screen resolution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171265</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171265</guid>
			<description>This is what SupportPlus writes in their product pages and flyers too, but it's obviously a QVGA one. Geeks and any other retailer simply use the information the OEM gave them.<br />
<br />
I can even count pixels on the screen, while on my x50v VGA PDA (3.7&quot;) it is smooth. Sorell doesn't say anything, they just say: 3.5&quot; screen. This is obviously a QVGA screen, it's just like all my other QVGA PDAs at the same screen size. Same kind of screen in terms of density.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>vbr mp3 in avi</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171299</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171299</guid>
			<description>using vbr mp3 in avi is not a good idea as it will normally out of synch. Storing that kind of format is a kind of hack, and this pmp doesn't seem to support it.Browser: Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/2.0.4509/1372; en; U; ssr)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (edogawaconan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: vbr mp3 in avi</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171318</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171318</guid>
			<description>The point is, most divx files out there are encoded with VBR.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>DivX issues</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171356</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171356</guid>
			<description>Maybe a FW replacement soon? If they would fix this, this gadget would rock - the price is just awesome.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sardaukar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: DivX issues</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171485</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171485</guid>
			<description>The device is not supported anymore by its manufacturer. They don't have plans to update the firmware.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: screen resolution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171734</guid>
			<description>Are you really sure?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/img/16160/sv1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/img/16160/sv1.jpg</a> looks like it isn't doable in 320x240 at all.<br />
<br />
<br />
Could you post a sharp picture of the whole screen please?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ford Prefect)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: screen resolution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171742</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171742</guid>
			<description>Yes, I am sure. The PMP has a 3.5&quot; QVGA screen, which is EXACTLY the same as the other QVGA PDA PocketPC screens in terms of density (I have 3 PPCs here to compare).<br />
<br />
For comparison I have taken close shots of my x50v PDA which has a real VGA screen (3.7&quot;), and the PMP's 3.5&quot;:<br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp1.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp2.jpg</a><br />
<br />
I have also uploaded some even closer shots of the two screens, notice how you can see the PMP's pixels very easily while on the real VGA screen you can't:<br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp3.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp4.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/img/16160/comp4.jpg</a><br />
<br />
And yes, a 320x240 screen is more than enough to draw these icons. Do not compare to a cellphone's QVGA screen where the icons and fonts are in reality huge because these come with just 2.2&quot; screens and not on 3.5&quot; ones. If you have ever used a PocketPC which usually come in 3.5&quot; QVGA screens you would be amazed how much information you can put in a single screen compared to a QVGA cellphone. This is the reason why I use a PocketPC as a cellphone: stores more info at the same resolution as other phones because the screen is bigger so designers can afford to make fonts and icons smaller.<br />
<br />
Update: I actually took comp1.jpg and counted the pixels on the screen. It *is* 320pix wide. This is a QVGA screen, there is no doubt about it. I have a beef with SupportPlus selling it to retailers as VGA.Edited 2006-10-14 22:04</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: screen resolution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?171748</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?171748</guid>
			<description>Thank you very much for this fast clarification!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ford Prefect)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LISTEN!!!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?173685</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?173685</guid>
			<description>Ive owned this little miracle which I purchased from geeks  for about 6 months now, and let me tell you DONT second guess it. ITS GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!BUY it!!!<br />
 It does everything it says and I bought it before they put the 50.00$$ off deal. I payed 200 and its worth every penny. <br />
<br />
Sound :great <br />
Video :great AS long as you convert files with its  software or take torrents made by &quot;Axxo&quot; (his stuff works perfect with out converting software.)<br />
FM tuner: great<br />
Camara: great<br />
VideoRecorder: great<br />
VoiceRecorder: great<br />
the Damm thing .... just works, I love this thing.<br />
<br />
Now for the bad theres NO support from the manf. So forget it, although my product has worked as promised it does have its little problems like:<br />
1} The sync problem with SOME video mentioned:  By edogawaconan<br />
2}Sluggish to respond to commands and certian indepth info on the System..<br />
<br />
 but, I took chance and updated the firmware not from the manf. <br />
But from SORELL sv10 V2.26<br />
   <br />
        I found a website:<br />
<a href="http://laser.k3pgp.org/bikecam.htm" rel="nofollow">http://laser.k3pgp.org/bikecam.htm</a><br />
<br />
with all instructions it took  less than 1 min.<br />
*********NOTE*******: After placeing the bin file in Data dir. a message will appear saying update dont power off.<br />
!!!DONT TOUCH IT leave it alone!!! it will turn itself off.<br />
And when you restart the device it will work BETTER WITH ALL problems mentioned above FIXED! ive noticed it reacts faster to selections in menu and also has a TEXT reader option now . Also had more info on the system itself mem H.d.d ect.<br />
<br />
I have the EXACT same MODEL being sold at geeks.com at moment and mentioned at this website with the firmware update. Supportplus SP-PMP51C . <br />
I Cant promise it will work for you {it should if done right}. But IT worked for me 100%<br />
 I Hope this helps ANY one interested in buying one and those who have one already....Goodluck <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2006-10-21 17:20</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (NNNN)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
