<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16221/_New_SGI_Emerges_from_Chapter_11</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:24:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Post the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; link</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172854</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172854</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.sgi.com/features/2006/october/growth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sgi.com/features/2006/october/growth/</a><br />
<br />
I don't understand why it seems people submitting news to OSNews always choose to submit blogs/news sites that just re-phrase the original source.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ormandj)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Post the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; link</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172857</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172857</guid>
			<description>Because they usually take out the marketing-speak from official press releases. I don't like press releases, as they are not independent.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Post the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; link</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172858</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172858</guid>
			<description>Fair enough, but in this case the press release has a lot of additional information. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  Oh well, that's what comments are for!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ormandj)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good luck to them</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172882</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172882</guid>
			<description>Hopefully, they'll find a way to grow the business once again.  It's always sad to see the winners fade away.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Webforce!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172896</guid>
			<description>The magic bus rides again.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sphinx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Militant tendency?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?172994</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?172994</guid>
			<description>I just wonder what they mean by that. What was the &quot;militant tendency&quot; of SGI?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (B. Janssen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pricing not disclosed</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?173016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?173016</guid>
			<description>I clicked through some of the products on their site and the price for everything is &quot;ask a sales rep&quot;.<br />
<br />
Others might disagree, but to me it shows a lack of confidence in their own products and pricing.<br />
<br />
<br />
'They' say: &quot;If you have to ask, you probably can't afford it&quot;<br />
<br />
I say: &quot;If you need to make me ask, you are probably asking too much&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Jody)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Pricing not disclosed</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?173060</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?173060</guid>
			<description>SGI pricing scheme:<br />
Lowend: $Stupidly.expensive<br />
Midrange: $Obnoxiously.expensive<br />
Highend: $WTF.99</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cptnapalm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Reminds me of a Paul Graham essay</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?173072</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?173072</guid>
			<description>SGI is just another example of something which, I believe, Paul Graham wrote of in one of his essays: eventually, the low end catches up and passes the high end.  SGI was and still is the high end, but it isn't as cost effective as a large number of whitebox Linux PCs which will be cheaper and faster, due to sheer numbers.<br />
<br />
My take is that they should start marketing consumer level graphics cards.  Compete on the lower end and gain market share there.  Otherwise they can only hold off their inevitable death.<br />
<br />
I like SGI as a company.  I would like to see them make a long term comeback... but I don't think it is going to happen.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cptnapalm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Pricing not disclosed</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?173099</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?173099</guid>
			<description>It's simply typical of enterprise-level sales.<br />
<br />
Discounts sometimes depend on your industry and your mix of products.  Having dealt with IBM mid-sized machines for years, it's only possible for them to post a price for a new customer buying one machine.  Generally, the service contract and the lease costs make it more difficult to exactly set figures.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wow</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?173128</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?173128</guid>
			<description>That was quick.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (twenex)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
