<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16306/MacBook_Pro_Core_2_Duo_Performance_Comparison</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:09:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175848</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175848</guid>
			<description>I think this looks great. The MacBook Pro finally got the two things I sorely missed in the previous version: FireWire 800 and 64-bit CPU. The disappointing thing, however, is that it only supports 3GB of memory. I guess I'd manage with 2GB for now until the prices on the 2GB sticks drop, but the option of 4GB would really be sweet. I have 1.25GB on my current PowerBook, which is rather on the painful side. (I constantly have 2-3GB in swap.)<br />
<br />
And, from what I've heard, Mathworks have a beta version of Matlab for Intel Macs out now, so that's no longer a huge obstacle for me either. Now, all I need is money. :-P</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CrimsonScythe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175851</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175851</guid>
			<description>2-3GB in swap and you have 1.25GB of ram?  Not to be an arse but people complain about Windows being bloated and using a lot of ram but...that's insane.  What do you do on your computer?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mym6)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175863</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175863</guid>
			<description>Windows was worse ;-) I do think that Linux is nicer on the memory consupmtion than either, though. Don't know if this is a fact, but that's my impression.<br />
<br />
In a typical session I have:<br />
* Opera with roughly 100 pages open.<br />
* Colloquy IRC program with 4-5 channels open.<br />
* TextMate editor (brilliant!) with 10-15 files open.<br />
* Emacs.<br />
* Adium messenger, connected with 5-8 different accounts/protocols.<br />
* Mail.<br />
* Safari, for testing purposes.<br />
* Terminal, 5-10 open sessions.<br />
* QuickSilver.<br />
* iTunes.<br />
* VLC.<br />
* Dictionary.<br />
* Preview.app with about 5-10 PDFs.<br />
* Azureus.<br />
* VirtueDesktops.<br />
* Various Menu applets like Menumeters, etc.<br />
* Various other apps from time to time, such as Matlab, Vim, etc.<br />
<br />
It all adds up to quite a lot, especially a hundred web pages. I mostly do surfing, programming, research, and LaTeX.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CrimsonScythe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175872</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175872</guid>
			<description>Linux tends to use less memory because Linux installs share as much code as possible. However, Linux handles high memory loads better than OS X as well. OS X's VM is ancient technology and its showing. It's still not as bad as XP under load, but it's not like Linux where I could often fail to notice swapping unless I was listening to the hard drive.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Noise, Heat and Battery Life</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175900</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175900</guid>
			<description>Right now, I'm much more interested in the changes in noise, heat and battery life. My ibook g4 did pretty well in those categories. The idea of going to a macbook almost seemed like a downgrade.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (twenty characters ma)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Clock speed?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?175950</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?175950</guid>
			<description>Clock speed is'nt all!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tore-)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?176001</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?176001</guid>
			<description>How do you ever got work done?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ronald Vos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?176091</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?176091</guid>
			<description>Wow, thats a lot of stuff. I typically have open:<br />
<br />
* firefox + about 15 extensions + ~30-50 websites<br />
* 2 or 3 instances of PuTTY connected to various remote servers via ssh or telnet<br />
* WinSCP connected to my shell<br />
* notepad++ with 3 or 4 files open<br />
* mediaplayer10 with about 5k MP3s in the playlist<br />
* POSE (palm os emulator)<br />
* several palm os programming tools (prcedit among others)<br />
* South palm os debugger (its a java app)<br />
* palm hotsink manager...<br />
<br />
few other things... and I'm typically only using about 500mb of RAM... (this is with windows XP)<br />
<br />
Guess most of my apps are smaller in size <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?176120</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?176120</guid>
			<description>How did you measure your 500MB? by counting in Process list?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (andyleung)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?176143</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?176143</guid>
			<description>100 pages?  I heard of this thing the other day, I think they called it a bookmark.  You might be interested :-P.<br />
<br />
I can see how you're using so much ram then and I don't think you can blame the OS, no matter which one your using.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mym6)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?176207</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?176207</guid>
			<description>&gt; * Emacs.<br />
<br />
Well there's your problem<br />
<br />
EMACS: Eight-hundred Megs And Swapping.<br />
<br />
;-D<br />
<br />
Seriously though, do you really need to keep everything running all the time?  The Dock is there so you don;t have to keep stuff running 24/7.<br />
<br />
I have Safari, iChat, and WoW (a ram and CPU hog) running on my 17&quot; PowerBook 1.66 (The last-gen PB) with 1GB ram.<br />
<br />
(I'm getting a new MBP 17&quot; soon, but I'm in the Silicon Valley, so naturally the Apple Stores are sold out :-) )Edited 2006-10-28 05:02</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zephc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

