<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16705/Interview_Johannes_Anderwald_ReactOS_Developer</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:14:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Great Project</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191482</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191482</guid>
			<description>I'm glad to see how far ReactOS has come over the years.  It's nice to see that they aren't following Microsoft's development model which over the years has been all about maintaining backwards compatibility even though it actually drags the system down with it; whereas ReactOS seems to focus more on present and future Windows feature implementation.  I guess thats why ReactOS is only around a 40 MB download whereas XP almost completely fills a CD.  Keep up the good work ReactOS team!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (brewmastre)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Great Project</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191509</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191509</guid>
			<description>Backwards compatability is essential for MS as most people won't upgrade to the lateat version of windows until all their favorite apps will run on it.<br />
One of many reasons ReactOS is much smaller than a standard XP install is the fact that many apps that are automatically installed by XP are not in ReactOS, plus there are other services/enhancements/bloatware (please choose whatever one you beleive) that have not been worked on fully yet, so by the time we start to see &quot;rock solid&quot; versions the install size may well be more than 40meg.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (petera)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Great Project</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191533</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191533</guid>
			<description>&quot;...so by the time we start to see &quot;rock solid&quot; versions the install size may well be more than 40meg.&quot;<br />
<br />
That is very true that ReactOS will become much larger as they add functionality and compatibility, but I don't think it will ever become as large or bloated.  Trust me, I'm not trash talking Windows.  I happen to think that Windows is a good OS, even though I'm a Mac and Linux guy <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />   All OS's grow larger as you add features, thats why OS X comes on an install DVD now.<br />
All I can say, is that hopefully by the time ReactOS is considered feature-complete, it will manage to remain somewhat small and efficient.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (brewmastre)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>high risk/high reward</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191642</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191642</guid>
			<description>Well there's litepc.com which gives some indication how much you can go.<br />
A free windows with its own destiny could really be trouble for Microsoft as it takes away Windows big advantage. The problem is the legal issues -if this gets off the ground, Microsoft's lawyers will act like vultures...If I was a company interested in reactos, I'd be wary</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (arielb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Great Project</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191643</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191643</guid>
			<description>All I can say, is that hopefully by the time ReactOS is considered feature-complete, it will manage to remain somewhat small and efficient.<br />
<br />
Not necessarily. Look at drivers.cab only in the windows installation directory (C:WINDOWSDriver Cachei386). Drivers alone eat ~60MB and there's tons of them - after unpacking it's almost 300MB !</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (agentj)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Uhm...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?191739</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?191739</guid>
			<description>...and when an interview to ME ?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Marco Ravich)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ok</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?192564</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?192564</guid>
			<description>Your interview...<br />
<br />
Your thoughts about this?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deanlinkous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
