<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16776/What_s_Next_for_AMD_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:56:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Whats New? LOTS!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?194785</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?194785</guid>
			<description>0. AMD K8L architecture<br />
1. AMD 4x4 architecture<br />
2. AMD Barcelona - true Quad Core CPU<br />
3. AMD/ATI CPU+GPU Integration<br />
4. AMD/ATI Radeon R600<br />
5. AMD/ATI X1650XT - ROP/Vertex/Shaders doubled comparing to X1600<br />
6. Propably some other things I forgot to mention ...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Java  XML?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?194806</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?194806</guid>
			<description>So this Java  XML Processor mentioned in the article.<br />
<br />
Would that mean the end of the JVM?  Will it be easier to use with Linux? (speculatively speaking)<br />
<br />
I know Java isn't that hard to install (quite easy with the Universe repos)... but these are Questions that must be asked.<br />
<br />
Is Web2.0 coming to hardware?  Will we grt a JavaSCRIPT processor with that too that will do this silly AJAX stuff?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>System on a Chip</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?194811</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?194811</guid>
			<description>It makes you wonder just how much technology they have been sharing with IBM.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SamuraiCrow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>vision</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?194831</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?194831</guid>
			<description>You can't say AMD lacks vision.Instead of bluntly going head to head with Intel into the n-core race they put their bets on different technology.Wether rightfully so remains to be seen.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 05:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (trinitrotolueen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Java  XML?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?195039</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?195039</guid>
			<description>I might be wrong, but I think it will be the same as with today's GPUs - they didn't eliminate the need for  OpenGL or DirectX they just implement certain functionality in hardware which makes exection significantly faster.Edited 2006-12-21 15:31</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Maners)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Whats New? LOTS!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?195552</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?195552</guid>
			<description>You forget:<br />
0) AMD K8L is still vapourware (AMD maybe late on this one)<br />
1) AMD 4x4 was a dud-generate too much heat with little performance to show.<br />
2) See 0) and people really don't care if how quad core is implemented- it just has to perform as promised!<br />
3) AMD/ATI integration or so called Fusion chip is a long way off. Don't expect to see anything until late 2008 0r early 2009. Alot could happen in two or three years.<br />
4) AMD 690 chipset is delayed again.<br />
5) ATI has a poor history of execution like AMD.<br />
<br />
AMD promised alot maybe too much-alot not enough-promise to keep.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (amdinvestor)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
