<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16868/Review_OpenSUSE_10_2</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:16:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Good review</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198520</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198520</guid>
			<description>This is a good review, in that it doesn't just list a couple of new package versions and post screenshots.  He actually goes through several things that were good and bad.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smitty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I can not support Microsoft</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198542</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198542</guid>
			<description>When I remember all the problems, obstacles, hours of vasted time with solving Windows problems, I must be crazy to install OS which is to MS related. Even today when there are GNU solutions. Switch to GNU Linux, or even better to *BSD.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vlado)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Good review</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198544</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198544</guid>
			<description>Yes, it's an interesting review, but his ideas about distributions seem a bit odd.<br />
<br />
He says he needs a combination of stability and cutting edge features. SLED 10 and RHEL 4 are not enough bleeding edge for him, yet he uses SUSE 9.3. Then he finds Gentoo and Debian too bleeding edge. Well, Gentoo has an unstable and a stable branch (the stable is quite conservative) and Debian has unstable, testing and stable branches. None of them suit his needs? He goes on saying that the only one that could replace SUSE is Fedora (which is a bleeding edge distro)...<br />
<br />
Not that it matters, the review itself was good and unusual. But I would have liked some feedback about how Debian or Ubuntu did in that same environment.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Luis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Some points</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198553</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198553</guid>
			<description>I agree with him about the Gnome menu. Fortunately I use KDE, but even in KDE I reverted to the standard menu, I didn't think a lot of the customized one.<br />
Ati cards: I had my share of problems too, but eventually  I found the right way. I might write an how to somewhere.<br />
I had to give up apt4rpm, which was an absolute trauma for me. Now I am using Smart, but smart-gui doesn't come even near to synaptic.<br />
Fonts: I haven't noticed that they are ugly. I installed the MS Fonts as usual, but if I understand the author correctly, it shouldn't make any difference.<br />
<br />
I can't see why OpenSUSE 10.2 can't be a good desktop OS: the only problem I have is watching WMP streams, but that has always been a problem with SUSE, even if you download the plug-ins from third party repositories.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous Penguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Good review</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198554</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198554</guid>
			<description>I also found what he wrote about Debian pretty odd. If anything, the only complaint could be that Stable becomes too old before the next one is released.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous Penguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Good review</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198560</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198560</guid>
			<description>Agreed.  I'm just happy this was different and hoping that other people in the future can take a cue from this.Edited 2007-01-04 22:59</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smitty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>screen shots</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198621</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198621</guid>
			<description>some screenshots to accompany this review at LinuxQuestions <a href="http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=openSUSE%2010.2" rel="nofollow">http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=openSUSE~*~@...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Some points</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198656</guid>
			<description><i>Fonts: I haven't noticed that they are ugly. I installed the MS Fonts as usual, but if I understand the author correctly, it shouldn't make any difference.</i><br />
<br />
You will notice the bad fonts if you connect a LCD screen via DVI.<br />
<br />
<i> can't see why OpenSUSE 10.2 can't be a good desktop OS:</i><br />
<br />
The package manager is still a weak bird.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (netpython)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>GRUB</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198666</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198666</guid>
			<description>Do others get penguins with christmas hats? That is the only thing I don't like.<br />
<br />
:)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: GRUB</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198687</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198687</guid>
			<description>nope, i did get windows from the redlight district though:-)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (netpython)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: GRUB</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198699</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198699</guid>
			<description>Yeah, got those as well.<br />
Kicked 10.2 out of the window (in favor of kubuntu) after a few days, crippling a media player so it can't play dvd's even when you install the right packages, come on? Compiz is nice, but it's really disturbing when you throw your mouse to the upper right corner that you get an overview of all the running applications, instead of being able to kill the running app (which was why I threw it to the upper right corner), their new k-menu replacement really sucks, perhaps their gnome version might be ok, didn't try it, but the kde one, no thank you.<br />
<br />
Yet suse 10.2 ran a lot faster than my last encounter with suse, even yast was fast.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Terracotta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Some points</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198727</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198727</guid>
			<description>While the crippling of Kaffeine and Xine on Novell's part is braindead, you should be fine after you replace both by setting up the pacman and guru repositories.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (porcel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Some points</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198735</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198735</guid>
			<description>&quot;You will notice the bad fonts if you connect a LCD screen via DVI.&quot;<br />
<br />
I see. I have LCD via VGA.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous Penguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Some points</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198739</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198739</guid>
			<description>I have done that, but still Kaffeine or Totem (or VLC) fail to start from a browser (or segfault).</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous Penguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: screen shots</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?198747</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?198747</guid>
			<description><a href="http://en.opensuse.org/Screenshots/Screenshots_openSUSE_10.2" rel="nofollow">http://en.opensuse.org/Screenshots/Screenshots_openSUSE_10.2</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dark_Knight)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
