<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16887/Microsoft_Pulls_Four_Planned_Patches</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:12:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199495</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199495</guid>
			<description>It most likely was due to bugs.<br />
<br />
When I worked there, they would announce things that were full of bugs and then work really hard to clean them up on time.  Sometimes, that just couldn't happen and they had to slip their release dates.<br />
<br />
They'll fix the problems and release them in a week or so, I think.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Clinton)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199525</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199525</guid>
			<description>They would announce things that were full of bugs and then work really hard to clean them up on time. Sometimes, that just couldn't happen and they had to slip their release dates. <br />
<br />
They also announce things that aren't written yet and then have to slip their release dates (Longhorn anyone?)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199533</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199533</guid>
			<description>They also announce things that aren't written yet and then have to slip their release dates (Longhorn anyone?)<br />
<br />
And, God knows, that never happens with open source projects... oh, wait ...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tomcat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199546</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199546</guid>
			<description>yes, we are waiting.......<br />
<br />
come on, tell us !</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raver31)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]:Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199552</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199552</guid>
			<description>Right and OSS announces projects to keep people from spending their money on existing products that work in order to keep them tied-in to that gawd-awful monopoly that is OSS. C'est terrible.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (acamfield)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199564</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199564</guid>
			<description>Shame on you for doubting the faith.<br />
<br />
:P</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ronaldst)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Same old same old</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199571</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199571</guid>
			<description>Move along, nothing to see here...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SReilly)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199603</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199603</guid>
			<description>Possibly true, but then Open-Source projects usually don't have any incentive to announce products with stupid deadlines just to squash competition.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]:Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199644</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199644</guid>
			<description>Unless I'm much mistaken (which I'm not), C'est terrible is actually calling something neat or cool...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tspears)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Just a slip</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?199917</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?199917</guid>
			<description>Microsoft has pulled four bulletins from its announced list of Patch Tuesday fixes, but did not specify why it was backpedaling on the security releases. It now plans to issue four security bulletins on Tuesday, rather than the eight originally announced, the software giant said last week in an updated notice on its Web site.<br />
<br />
The four mentioned were actually features mistakenly 'corrected'.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zsitvaij)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]:Bugs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?200420</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?200420</guid>
			<description>Curious, I read that literally as, &quot;it is terrible&quot;, but my french has not seen much use since high school. That must be how they say it's cool in bizarro France or is it slang, like U.S. kids might say, &quot;that's sick&quot;, or something.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sphinx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
