<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/16961/What_s_Cooking_for_FreeBSD_7_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:06:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Oh yea</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202166</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202166</guid>
			<description>So many cutting edge goodies.. I can't help it... my home desktop is -CURRENT <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nullpt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202177</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202177</guid>
			<description>...the changes requested by nVidia? I've long been waiting for this so that I could run nVidia drivers on amd64 kernel.<br />
<br />
Also if ZFS is 64bit (as opposed to 128 bit of Sun ZFS), I imagine this would make Sun and FreeBSD ZFS volumes inoperable with each other. What about Apple ZFS volumes?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (atici)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>re</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202197</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202197</guid>
			<description>&gt;the changes requested by nVidia<br />
<br />
Nice i've read it, but maybe the should do the first step and open their sources, would be better quality for all the open operating systems.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Oliver)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Read it again....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202209</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202209</guid>
			<description>&quot;(limited to 64 bits in practice even in Solaris - there's no 128-bit integer type in standard C language)&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (chicklin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>wow</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202274</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202274</guid>
			<description>now this is a release i was to see pc-bsd based off of. this would blow vista away. imagine all those improvements and kde 4. drooooool</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TOE and other offload</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202310</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202310</guid>
			<description>Sometime back i argued with many people why TOE is good and can increase networking performance.<br />
<br />
And how Vista's networking is high performant with TOE etc. People argued back quoting Linux and BSD example as to why these OS don't have that.<br />
<br />
Well looks like FreeBSD is getting TOE support so let us see who is following Vista here:)<br />
<br />
And still in FreeBSD it is not as well designed as Vista.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CrazyDude0)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title> TOE and other offload</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202357</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202357</guid>
			<description>&gt; And still in FreeBSD it is not as well designed as Vista.<br />
<br />
Really, and you have access to the source code in Vista to make that unsupported conclusion?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pat9912)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nvidia Support Fixes.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202460</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202460</guid>
			<description>Anyone know if any of the requests from Nvidia to help aid the 64bit FreeBSD driver and other features are going to make it into this release?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (w00dst0ck)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xen</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?202479</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?202479</guid>
			<description>Does freebsd 6.2 have xen? i could not find  any info on freebsd 6.2 being able to run xen.Edited 2007-01-17 00:55</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (happycamper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
