<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17312/SQL_Server_2005_Gets_Second_Service_Pack</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:34:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>so confused</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?214807</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?214807</guid>
			<description>but iam unable to use a Sql 2005 express &quot;user instance&quot; via Web developer express as a non-admin on xp.<br />
<br />
this forces me to be a member of the administrator group... <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PipoDeClown)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: so confused</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?214844</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?214844</guid>
			<description>It seems thusfar that the developer experience on Windows (even with only microsoft tools) is still pretty much admin-only.  I just found this out with VS2005.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PlatformAgnostic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This is actually good news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?214868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?214868</guid>
			<description>The major change in this release has been Common Criteria support for EAL4 security controls.  <br />
<br />
What this means is that SQL Server now supports Residual Information Protection (erasing memory before the memory is allocated to a new resource), proper login statistics and auditing (like Oracle has had for years), and Column GRANT should not override table DENY.<br />
<br />
This is one of the few products Microsoft puts out which has consistently tried to do better in terms of security and reliability.  It is a completely different product than SQL Server 2000 in that regard.  <br />
<br />
When you integrate it with Active Directory and IIS 6.0, you actually have support for very fine-grained authorization, authentication, and accounting.  That is, if you do it right and plan it accordingly.  There's a significant amount of infrastructure that your average ASP.NET app does not touch within SQL Server 2005, .NET 2.0, and IIS 6. <br />
<br />
Oracle has this also, but will charge you an arm and a leg for Oracle Advanced Security or Oracle Single Sign On.<br />
<br />
You can also build this in WebLogic, but again, you will be charged an arm and a leg by BEA.<br />
<br />
You can build this in Apache/(Linux/BSD/Solaris)/Kerberos/Java/PHP as well, and save a lot of money.  However, there's a lot of corporate apps out there that run .NET.<br />
<br />
Again, Microsoft has put out a decent database server product and updated it with new features without gouging the customers like Oracle <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mbpark)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

