<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17449/Windows_32bit_64bit_Drivers_for_3Dfx_Range_Appear</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:57:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219425</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219425</guid>
			<description>Whats funny is that these cards actually work on Vista, even without Aero.<br />
<br />
Also, how did they write the drivers? Where the hardware specs opened?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Community</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219432</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219432</guid>
			<description>3Dfx always have had great community.<br />
<br />
It's big pity that so great 3D card manufacturer that started it all has died.<br />
<br />
RIP 3Dfx.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wow</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219435</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219435</guid>
			<description>Wow, 3Dfx just will not die. I had a friend 5 or 6 years ago and he was a die hard 3Dfx guy.<br />
Good community.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (milatchi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too Bad for 3Dfx</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219437</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219437</guid>
			<description>When they were around, they were the best cards by a wide margin.  But no, they had to keep Glide to themselves and carved themselves a niche in obscurity (as well as only catering to the gaming crowd and basically ignoring the rest of the market).  <br />
<br />
I'm glad that there are those that still support the cards.  I hope they'll be able to build Vista drivers as well.  It's disappointing to see the support doesn't extend to the Voodoo 2 cards.  I know someone who has an old gaming rig in the basement with two Voodoo 2 cards in SLI.  It was a sweet system.<br />
<br />
Does anyone have any experience in how well they're supported in Linux?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (crazybob)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Italians do it better</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219438</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219438</guid>
			<description>I'm joking..<br />
<br />
The drivers came from an italian community called 3dfxzone.it</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tanner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Test</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219444</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219444</guid>
			<description>Can someone please test these drivers under Vista and tell me if they work or not. I wont switch to Vista because my second monitor (3dfx card) would not work under vista, even though i never tried any drivers ( i thought vista should have em already)<br />
<br />
Please Help,<br />
<br />
Thanks</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eagle101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Too Bad for 3Dfx</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219452</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219452</guid>
			<description><i>Does anyone have any experience in how well they're supported in Linux?</i><br />
<br />
Generally very good, I have Voodoo3 2000 AGP card in my 2 x AthlonXP 2000 FreeBSD box. Works very good with X11 drivers.Edited 2007-03-08 00:11</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219453</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219453</guid>
			<description>The source code for the drivers was leaked shortly after 3Dfx was bought out.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mmebane)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Coolness</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219457</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219457</guid>
			<description>I still own a win98 box with a V5 5500 which is used not just for retrogaming, but for ProDesign 3d, an old DOS based CAD program that had glide support (I still prefer it to 3ds max for a number of things - like floating point accuracy to more than three decimal places)<br />
<br />
For non shader applications, the Voodoo 5, or even a SLI voodoo 2 setup can give both nVidia and ATI's 'top end offering' from five years ago a run for their money, easily being the equivalent of a Ge2 or Radeon 8500.<br />
<br />
It's hard to justify throwing away anything that still works and can perform a needed job - so it's nice to see fan support like this.<br />
<br />
Now if we could just get some X11 drivers better than the reference ones <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deathshadow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219459</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219459</guid>
			<description>Maybe, but the specs were opened too. 3dfx released some pdfs with docs, and made quite a big deal about them opening up that info. The Open Source community loved it.<br />
<br />
Of course then they died off. Bummer.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (obi_oni)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Blast from the past</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219461</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219461</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I remember the outcry when 3dfx went under.  That was a sad day indeed.  I don't remember anything about graphzilla, though.  I was always under the impression that NVidia bought 3dfx and the first GeForce was based on a hybrid combo of the Rage and Voodoo chipset.  Apparently I was wrong.<br />
<br />
Good for the community to keep things going.  Kudos to them.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Phloptical)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Too Bad for 3Dfx</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219463</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219463</guid>
			<description>&quot;Generally very good, I have Voodoo3 2000 AGP card in my 2 x AthlonXP 2000 FreeBSD box. Works very good with X11 drivers. &quot;<br />
<br />
Can confirm this. Along with a 500 MHz Intel CPU, the Voodoo3 (without fan!) was my first run of RTCW, glquake and lsdldoom some years. On FreeBSD 4 with XFree86 drivers. Fine hardware. Well supported and very silent. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Doc Pain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219481</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219481</guid>
			<description>The SST-1 and Voodoo3 programmers manuals are both openly available. They're actually extremely good pieces of documentation. Unlike most of Intel's specification sheets, they're not just simple register descriptions. 3dfx's documentation describes the general theory of operation of the graphics chip, describes how to do specific tasks, and provides both detailed register descriptions and implementation notes. <br />
<br />
You can find the Voodoo 3 specs here: <a href="http://v3tv.sourceforge.net/download/voodoo3_spec.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://v3tv.sourceforge.net/download/voodoo3_spec.pdf</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Blast from the past</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219483</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219483</guid>
			<description>GeForce was not a combo of any of 3dfx's designs. Undoubtedly 3dfx stuff went into NVIDIA's later designs, but that was post GeForce.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>NVidia bougth them</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219492</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219492</guid>
			<description>I dont know what the hell it is with that GraphZilla, but I can tell that it's NVidia that bougth them (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3dfx" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3dfx</a>). I would have like to see those Voodoo5 in SLI. I guess it would have been a killer scene, in particular with the 4 GPU card. Wish 3DFx would still be alive <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (werfu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: NVidia bougth them</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219520</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219520</guid>
			<description>I think the author was attempting some wordplay and  meant nVidia when he wrote Graphzilla...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ventajou)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Blast from the past</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219530</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219530</guid>
			<description>The Inquirer refers to nvidia as graphzilla<br />
<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx</a><br />
<br />
Does anyone know if any opensource hardware projects are based around the released 3dfx designs?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (voidlogic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>can anyone tell me...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219589</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219589</guid>
			<description>what was/is so special about these cards?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Darkelve)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: can anyone tell me...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219595</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219595</guid>
			<description>3DFX took a different approach to producing cards. It was a sad day when 3DFX died, in the same way it was sad when the last PPC Mac was replaced. Sure the new stuff is better, but it's boring having everything just x86.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>anyone remember Rampage?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219623</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219623</guid>
			<description>the rumoured next chipset from 3DFX before they went bust. <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (REMF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>64 bit? signed?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219647</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219647</guid>
			<description>I was under impression that all drivers for 64 bit Vista must be signed. How they overcomed this requirement? Or did they pay to have drivers signed by MS?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zdzichu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Italians do it better</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219654</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219654</guid>
			<description>No...its true. We really do.<br />
LOL<br />
-nX</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (NixerX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Blast from the past</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219657</guid>
			<description>I was always under the impression that NVidia bought 3dfx and the first GeForce was based on a hybrid combo of the Rage and Voodoo chipset.<br />
<br />
Do you mean Riva?  Rage was/is a GPU from ATI.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (brewmastre)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: can anyone tell me...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219659</guid>
			<description>what was/is so special about these cards?<br />
<br />
I think it was a combination of two things, GLIDE and Image quality.  Glide provided a low-level API for game developer so that they could squeeze the max performance out of the chips.  As far as image quality, they were definitely one of the best.  I think only Matrox beat them as far as 2D quality, but for 3D they were the king.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (brewmastre)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Test</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219671</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219671</guid>
			<description>I don't have one of theses cards to test... but, IIRC, Vista can only handle ONE graphic card drive. That means you can use several ATi or nVidia video cards, but you can't have mixed card in your setup.<br />
<br />
That probably falls in the same case for your only 3dfx card used in your second monitor...<br />
<br />
Not sure, but one of reasons to this limitation (by design) may be the content security using HDCP and because Aero.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JrezIN)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Test</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219709</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219709</guid>
			<description>Are you sure about that? It just sounds a little odd to not be able to use mixed video cards in my setup...It worked fine under all other verisons of windows...Anyways, i was wondering if it will work under vista with these new drivers from the community.<br />
<br />
Thanks</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eagle101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: 64 bit? signed?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219735</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219735</guid>
			<description>I'm currently running Vista 64bit with unsigned, beta drivers by nVidia. I also have unsigned, beta drivers for my Creative sound card. I don't think signed drivers are a must as my system would not be running.<br />
<br />
If you think about it, nobody will pay to have beta drivers signed. Think of the outcry by hardware vendors if they could not get the general population to test they're drivers. MS would very soon be dealing with allot of pressure.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SReilly)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The first 3dfx tech in a GeForce was...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219767</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219767</guid>
			<description>The first time nVidia 'admitted' that they were using 3dfx tech in their cards was the GeForce FX line (you remember the FX5800 dust buster?) There was a video presentation that showed the 'fx' from the 3dfx logo combining with 'GeForce'.<br />
<br />
As it turns out, though, if I remember correctly, nVidia had been using 3dfx 2D intellectual property in at least the GeForce 4. I think the FX series was just supposed to be the first 'collaborative' release between the two sets of engineers.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jrronimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: can anyone tell me...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219783</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219783</guid>
			<description>3dfx was a pioneer in the 3D add-on card business. And they were a fun company -- they had commercials talking about how their chips could perform so many operations a second and how this could be used to save lives... and instead they play games.<br />
<br />
Plus, the Voodoo 2 cards were the first cards to be end-user expandable in terms of parallel...ity (I guess? haha). It's where SLI originally came from: Scan Line Interleave -- the two cards would render every other scanline, thus improving performance by allowing each card to render 'half' the screen. The Voodoo 5 5500 expanded on this idea in a single card (being two processors on one card), with the would-have-been follow up, the Voodoo 5 6000 having 4 processors. (There are some V5 6k's out there, but most have a problem of some sort).<br />
<br />
As touched on by one of the above posters, their Image Quality (IQ) is /still/ considered some of the best by some people. Their method of Anti-Aliasing was absolutely amazing. The Rotated Grid SuperSampling method employed by them had some of the most amazing 4xFSAA available. That being said, it was also /incredibly/ memory and computationally expensive, so running Counter-Strike (original) at 1024x768 w/ 4xFSAA is... playable, but not amazing, performance-wise.<br />
<br />
Really, they were just a cool company. It's hard to say why their cards were so cool.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jrronimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: anyone remember Rampage?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219787</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219787</guid>
			<description>Rampage would've been great. There's a lot of good information about it out there, most notably on Rashly's 3dfx page: <a href="http://www.rashly3dfx.com/products/rampage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rashly3dfx.com/products/rampage.html</a>.<br />
<br />
Somewhere there is even a Rampage in the hands of a collector (probably Italy). I think they found some drivers for it and fired it up. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jrronimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not Vista</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219788</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219788</guid>
			<description>I don't think these drivers are for 64-bit Vista -- I think it's 64-bit XP.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jrronimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219868</guid>
			<description>All this talk about 3dfx is openness is absurd - why can't you guys accept the fact that the drivers were leaked? <br />
<br />
j/k</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jelway)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: can anyone tell me...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219874</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219874</guid>
			<description>Actually, by the time the TNT came out, 3dfx was behind in image quality. The &quot;3dfx look&quot; that was a revolution with the Voodoo 1 was by the time of the Voodoo 3 dismissed as overly filtered and washed-out. They were behind NVIDIA in offering advanced filtering modes and graphics effects, and totally dropped the ball on 32-bit rendering.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219875</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219875</guid>
			<description>What do you mean its absurd? I posted a link to the doc in this thread!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wow</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?219936</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?219936</guid>
			<description>Is he not your friend anymore, do you know if he is 3dfs hardcore now? 5-6 years ago doesn´t count for today.<br />
<br />
I had an 166 MHz pc 6-7 years ago and i it was hardcore for me, but not today.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (riha)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Blast from the past</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?220155</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?220155</guid>
			<description>That's the one.  My mistake.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Phloptical)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

