<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17847/Pidgin_IM_2_0_Released_Review</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:05:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>enjoyed beta 7 last week</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237331</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237331</guid>
			<description>heres to a new awesome release!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sn0n)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>-</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237337</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237337</guid>
			<description>looks good, but a memory hog compared to Miranda (which is win32 only tho).<br />
6,5MB vs 18MB.<br />
Didn't seem any better than Miranda.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Matzon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Worst website redesign ever</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237338</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237338</guid>
			<description>New logo, colours and layout make my eyes bleed. Gah!<br />
<br />
Pidgin looks like a great update, sadly I have to wait until plugin enabling polish Tlen protocol (XMPP-based) is ported to the new version. Are there any fellow polish OSnews readers using this plugin? Did you succeed at compiling it against Pidgin?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (miscz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Favorite IM client by far</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237340</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237340</guid>
			<description>Pidgin 2.0 is really nice, even on Windows. I didn't upgrade until it was out of beta, even though the beta builds were pretty much stable.<br />
<br />
I would have linked to Pidgin's website instead of Ars when I submitted this story this morning, but it had apparently gotten Slashdotted.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shykid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What's with the name?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237342</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237342</guid>
			<description>I've seen a few reviews of this where they've referred to how good the name Pidgin is, and I really don't get it.<br />
<br />
Is it 'pigeon' spelled wrong, as in 'messenger pigeon'?<br />
<br />
I'd have thought 'PidgIM' would be better.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (simo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What's with the name?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237345</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237345</guid>
			<description><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pidgin" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pidgin</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stustill)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>why?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237346</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237346</guid>
			<description>I installed it and it seems okay, but why would I use this over the native IM clients?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not as good as Trillian on Windows</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237347</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237347</guid>
			<description>The Windows version crashes here when I drag n drop a contact to my General category. Also, the Y! contacts don't show avatars.<br />
<br />
More over, the placement of windows I don't like at all: they don't remember their positions.<br />
<br />
And the one thing really important for me: you can't make the contacts list visible but without showing it in the windows taskbar. Other IM apps do that by default.<br />
<br />
Lastly, the SIMPLE/SIP plugin does not seem to work with the FWD service. If anyone has the exact steps to make it work, I am all ears.Edited 2007-05-04 22:39</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Looks Good</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237348</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237348</guid>
			<description>I like the UI revamping from 1.5, especially the Tango-ish icons and smileys and simpler configuration dialogs.<br />
<br />
Thanks and Keep up the good work, Pidgin hackers! <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (codergeek42)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237349</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237349</guid>
			<description>What &quot;native IM clients&quot; are you talking about?<br />
<br />
Personally I think gaim/pigin is the best IM client for gnome and xfce. If you run it on KDE it looks a bit out of place but I still like it better than kopete.Edited 2007-05-04 22:42</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nxsty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237350</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237350</guid>
			<description>i wouldn't call it a &quot;memory hog&quot;, specially since it's using the gtk toolkit... <br />
also, if i'm not mistaken the 2.0 beta5 version of gaim was using a bit over 20MB so at least it's a step forward.<br />
<br />
Love the new interface, much better than the (purple?!?) website, imho.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jcinacio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237351</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237351</guid>
			<description>Because it lets you connect to more than one IM network in one program while using less resources than either of the native clients?<br />
<br />
Because the UI is not littered with ads?<br />
<br />
Because the UI looks a lot better than the flashy skins featured by the native clients?<br />
<br />
Because it is expandable through tons of plugins?<br />
<br />
Because it is available on more than one platform?<br />
<br />
Sure, it doesn't have some of the features of the native clients (voice and video come to mind). Yet. However, Pidgin 2.0.0 is a great basis to expand on featurewise. And a much better alternative to the native clients in my opinion.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fpbecker)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Worst website redesign ever</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237352</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237352</guid>
			<description>Oh come it it's not that bad at all, it's not a site you visit for daily must haves and news. If you think it's a bad design then you have had no life on the internet.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SlackerJack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Contacts list</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237353</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237353</guid>
			<description>There's a plugin that lets you hide contacts list from the taskbar - <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim-extprefsEdited" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim-extprefsEdited</a> 2007-05-04 22:53 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (miscz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Contacts list</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237354</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237354</guid>
			<description>This should have been a feature in the main preference dialog, not inside a plugin.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not as good as Trillian on Windows</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237356</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237356</guid>
			<description>One more: When I get a new mail on hotmail and Y! and then I VIEW it on my Outlook Express or via a web browser, the notice of &quot;you have 1 new email&quot; does NOT go away. This means that I have to do an extra 2 clicks to get rid of the message. Very annoying.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No file transfer for Yahoo</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237359</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237359</guid>
			<description>I love the new look and feel - it's so much better than 1.5<br />
<br />
Unfortunately the file transfer does not work for YM. Just tried to transfer from/to YM 8.1 with little luck. Also, there is no buzz and the new option &quot;Start doodling&quot; doesn't work.<br />
<br />
I have little use for voice/video/audibles so I don't mind them not working.<br />
<br />
I don't know about the rest of the protocols, but the Yahoo part still needs some serious love.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pandronic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Contacts list</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237360</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237360</guid>
			<description>I'm not trying to defend weaker sides of Pidgin, just being informative <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (miscz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Like the new icon and smiley themes</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237364</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237364</guid>
			<description>looks excellent.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Worst website redesign ever</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237367</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237367</guid>
			<description>Layout is fine. The logo is a little goofy, but the two quotes in the name are actaully rather inventive.<br />
<br />
Color choice could've been...less original? Hehe.<br />
<br />
The design isn't bad at all IMO, just a few color and mascot changes and we're good. They're branding their &quot;technology&quot; though which is good too. The program's interface is quite an improvement as well. I'm all for simple and I think they've done and excellent job.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DittoBox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237376</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237376</guid>
			<description>Miranda is a arse, it's rather complicated to not that easy to setup to your liking. Memory wise maybe because it's not native win32 UI, that would be shared memory under gnome so.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SlackerJack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not as good as Trillian on Windows</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237377</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237377</guid>
			<description>Trillians also becoming full of Bloat, i do use Astra , why the Preference List wasn't Cleaned up to look good or as good as the GUI of Astra i don't know . but you have to remember Pidgin is really for the Linux OS, so Pidgin will lack its Windows Features</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sabz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Not as good as Trillian on Windows</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237378</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237378</guid>
			<description>This is not true, Win32 of Pidgin version has Windows features and the latest GTK version has added some more Windows features like menu shadows for win32.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SlackerJack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237380</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237380</guid>
			<description>It's ugly. There is no way it will compete with Adium.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Babi Asu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237382</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237382</guid>
			<description>Adium is only OS X, at least Pidgin is cross platform.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 01:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SlackerJack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237392</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237392</guid>
			<description>Adium is based on libpurple.  (the Pidgin library that provides support for all the protocols)  Without Pidgin there would be no Adium!<br />
<br />
See for yourself: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adium" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adium</a><br />
<br />
&quot;Adium is a popular instant messaging client for Mac OS X that supports multiple protocols through the libpurple lbrary.&quot;<br />
<br />
Edit:  And it is not intended to compete with Adium either!  it has no OS X version.  Infact they recommend Adium on their own webpage: <a href="http://www.pidgin.im/pidgin/about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pidgin.im/pidgin/about/</a><br />
<br />
&quot;Pidgin runs on a number of platforms, including Windows Linux, and other UNIX operating systems. Looking for Pidgin for OS X? Try Adium!&quot;Edited 2007-05-05 03:35</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 03:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The trouble with GAIM</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237412</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237412</guid>
			<description>I love GAIM/Pidgin... best IM client for Windows. But one thing bugs me -- the fact that I've never been able to figure out how to just show contacts in alphabetical (or sorted by status) order. I hate the fact that Pidgin shows them ordered in groups!! I sorted them into groups years ago and now I can't find any way to un-sort them.<br />
<br />
(Logically, you should be able to just drag them out of the groups and put them back into a single group, but I've found that if you do that, the next time you start GAIM, it comes up with a bunch of errors about how they're in one group on the local PC and another group in the server...)</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 05:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (danwarne)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What's with the name?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237418</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237418</guid>
			<description>like stustill said, a pidgin is a new language created from a combination of other languages. So in a way this brings together different im networks, creating something new, like how hebrew and german created yiddish, heheEdited 2007-05-05 06:10</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 06:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (m1t0s1s)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237419</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237419</guid>
			<description>It doesn't have to compare itself to Adium... thats offtopic when we're talking about pidgin!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 06:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Matzon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237424</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237424</guid>
			<description>Many talked about Trillian and Miranda, and you don't give a damn? How discriminative. The point is, both projects are OSS, but why Pidgin is so ugly?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 06:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Babi Asu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wow</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237431</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237431</guid>
			<description>Wow, they really outdid themselves. I used Gaim for about six months, and honestly, I think it is pretty ugly. Pidgin is much, much better. I actually think it competes now! Works great in Ubuntu, too!<br />
<br />
Website is very cool too! Well layed-out!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 07:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kelly Rush)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237453</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237453</guid>
			<description>It is not ugly. You just have a weird taste. Adium is but ugly seem from my point of view. That's the beauty of personal preferences - get used to it!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 10:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dylansmrjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Adium</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237461</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237461</guid>
			<description>I'm currently running OSX and Adium but only because it's the better option in OSX. I don't like it at all, Pidgin or Kopete are just better.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 11:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Vide)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>re</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237464</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237464</guid>
			<description>The significant improvement is imo Finch and the nice logo <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pidgin.im/pidgin/about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pidgin.im/pidgin/about/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 12:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Oliver)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>yeah</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237472</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237472</guid>
			<description>that's amazing!<br />
<br />
So we have finally a great IM Client for Linux (and through adium) for OS X!<br />
<br />
amzing work,<br />
congrats!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SK8T)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What's so exciting about Pidgin 2.0?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237479</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237479</guid>
			<description>Seriously, this is crazy. Aftr two years of development there's no webcam support - something that messenger has been doing since forever, and it's a major feature for any IM. And no VOIP. That's why I keep using kopete, even if it's a memory pig: At least I do have MSN webcam support.<br />
<br />
It's sad that OSS IM's are in a so poor state. Pidgin however makes me feel like I'm going back to the 90's</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diegocg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No voice chat</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237486</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237486</guid>
			<description>I've used Gaim daily for a couple of years, and it's good. The enhancements to 2.0 over 1.5 are nice. I understand that the devs can only do so much, but I wish that the dev team would have focused on adding voice-chat to Gaim instead of many of the other features. A lack of voice chat means using other clients for voice, and if you have to use another client for voice then you might as well use it for text too rather than have a separate client for that, and then Gaim becomes irrelevant. I'm hoping that now that they have the new design and the plug-in API solid that voice (and video) will soon follow. Otherwise, I don't think Gaim will remain that relevant in the long term.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zerohalo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237508</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237508</guid>
			<description>I downloaded the official FC6 RPM from the pidgin site.<br />
<br />
2.0 is hot. Even better than Trillian in some ways. The GTK+ theme plugin allows changing the theme also.Edited 2007-05-05 16:08</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 16:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Worst website redesign ever</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237541</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237541</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">If you think it's a bad design then you have had no life on the internet. </div><br />
<br />
Quoi?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 18:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (StephenBeDoper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Get it at..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237586</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237586</guid>
			<description>There is a .deb of it at www.getdeb.net</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gothic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: why?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237674</guid>
			<description>I like the support for video in Kopete</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 08:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Isolationist)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237688</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237688</guid>
			<description>As it uses GTK instead of MFC, many memory is eaten up by this &quot;redundant&quot; toolkit. So pidgin itself isn't a real memory hog, if you run it under gnome, or even just besides Firefox under Linux...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 11:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ford Prefect)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237703</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237703</guid>
			<description>hum dude just to let you know that the memory usage greatly depends in what the program is doing. I can show you a screen capture with a little bit over 3 mb RAM used and yes I do have a conversation window open.<br />
<br />
Overall the final release is not a huge step forward compared to the beta releases but it is a very polished one. I can't say I like the new logo but the interface is great and the use of tango icons is awesome. I must say that this is just as professionally done as any software that I have seen and the nice thing is that there is no fat ... oh and the windows integration is great but this isn't really new.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 13:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cg0def)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: -</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237704</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237704</guid>
			<description>yes except that pudgin DOES NOT compete with Adium. Not to mention that Adium would never run on anything but Mac OS ...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 13:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cg0def)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No file transfer for Yahoo</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237711</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237711</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Also, there is no buzz... </div><br />
/buzz ?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 14:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (edogawaconan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not bad</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237796</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237796</guid>
			<description>It's definitely snappier than GAIM on Windows, and seems to work. The only trouble I've had is that it won't get Aspell.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cerbie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
