<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17859/Ion3_RC1_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:01:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Well done</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237755</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237755</guid>
			<description>I love this little wm.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 18:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pllb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237771</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237771</guid>
			<description>There was some discussion about a week ago on the misc@openbsd.org mailing lists where the decision of the developer to change the license to Ion may result in it being removed from the OpenBSD ports tree.  I don't know the details, but if this is true, I wonder if it will result in problems with other OS's?<br />
<br />
License change notice:<br />
<a href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general/7701" rel="nofollow">http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general/770...</a>  <br />
<br />
OpenBSD thread:<br />
<a href="http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-04/2159.html" rel="nofollow">http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-04/2159.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237794</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237794</guid>
			<description>Let me get this straight: The author wants the name of the WM to refer to his codebase with no additions like Ion3v462007. And any off shoots are either not to use the name or to clearly spell out they are not Ion3. Okay, seems OK. A little annoying but fair since its his name.<br />
<br />
Where the crunch comes in is in when somebody does a patch that changes Ion3 in a significant way. You need the approval of the author to do this since, in this theory, makes it not purely Ion3. This seems to take things a bit far and this is what OpenBSD is adjecting to.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zizban)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I loved this wm the moment...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237809</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237809</guid>
			<description>I laid my ion it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 23:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hhcv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Oh, good. A manifesto. We were running short.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237817</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237817</guid>
			<description>I like Ion, and I use my keyboard a lot (hooray, Quicksilver!). That being said, here's a little something from the Ion manifesto:<br />
<br />
&quot;So-called 'modern desktop environments' converge on total unusability ... &quot;<br />
<br />
Somehow, I managed to point and click my way to posting that.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (paperfrog)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237818</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237818</guid>
			<description>So it's IceWeasel all over again?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Michael)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Oh, good. A manifesto. We were running short.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237821</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237821</guid>
			<description>I think he means, and I could be wrong, that its not the GUI that's bad, its the way they're done in some window managers. Obviously, he doesn't think much of KDE, et al, and decided to try his own GUI.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zizban)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ion3 is neat - author is over the top</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237829</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237829</guid>
			<description>ion3 is neat, but the author's blog is a bit over the top. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MobyTurbo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Oh, good. A manifesto. We were running short.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237838</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237838</guid>
			<description>&quot;I like Ion, and I use my keyboard a lot (hooray, Quicksilver!).&quot;<br />
<br />
I tried Ion but came back to WindowMaker, it's because I use the keybpard a lot (IBM 1391403, Sun Type 6) and found that Ion misses some features I learned to need. :-)<br />
<br />
But still, Ion is impressing fast, even on older machines. It looks professional and does not seem to have problems managing applications that use different toolkits - still looking professional.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 03:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Doc Pain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237916</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237916</guid>
			<description>Same behaviour from Tuomo was apparent on Arch Linux's mailing lists recently as well:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archlinux.org/pipermail/tur-users/2007-April/004634.html" rel="nofollow">http://archlinux.org/pipermail/tur-users/2007-April/004634.html</a>  <br />
<br />
It's almost as if he wanted everybody to ignore him and ion.Edited 2007-05-07 11:05</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vegai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Important milestone</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237918</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237918</guid>
			<description>Ion was a very important window manager insofar that it paved the way for other, simple wms, and more innovative layouts.<br />
<br />
It is not that important in itself anymore, but it certainly will be remember as an important pioneer.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vegai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237922</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237922</guid>
			<description>&quot;Same behaviour from Tuomo was apparent on Arch Linux's mailing lists recently as well:&quot;<br />
<br />
Wow. Heh. What can you say? It's entertaining in some sick kind of way when people go out of their way to come across as total moronic jerks.<br />
I think the best part was the &quot;timely release&quot; clause he was/is going to put in the license. Is your Ion package lagging? Watch out! Tuomo will legally threaten you!<br />
Heh. Man. This totally made my day.<br />
<br />
&quot;It's almost as if he wanted everybody to ignore him and ion. &quot;<br />
<br />
I guess everyone does already and that's why he's so irrationally pissed off at FOSS.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I loved this wm the moment...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237925</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237925</guid>
			<description>Fooled around with it in the past.  Didn't have the time/motivation for Lua then.  Your pun has motivated me.  Thanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smitty_one_each)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nope</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237934</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237934</guid>
			<description>Nope.<br />
<br />
Still don't understand what the heck a(n) &quot;Ion3&quot; is. Don't even know if it is &quot;l&quot; as a small &quot;L&quot; or &quot;I&quot; like a capital &quot;i&quot;. Guess it's not for me. Sigh.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Network23)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237944</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237944</guid>
			<description>So it's IceWeasel all over again?<br />
<br />
Yep, it sure is:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422527#10" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422527#10</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I loved this wm the moment...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237955</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237955</guid>
			<description>I laid my ion it.<br />
<br />
Why the hell has this comment been modded up? This ain't Slashdot, bad puns should not generate good karma.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (openwookie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Important milestone</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?237986</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?237986</guid>
			<description>So what are the names of these &quot;new, even more innovative&quot;?<br />
<br />
I liked ION a lot, even though I dumped it as soon,<br />
as I discovered that author will never add a hack that would make it interoperable with GIMP and Gnome applets...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mgajda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: License Change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?238005</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?238005</guid>
			<description>It's actually really simple to understand. Various distributions distribute ion3 packages with unsupported patches. When said ion3 package doesn't work, they go to Tuomo bitching about it.<br />
<br />
He has made it exceedingly clear that he will not support patched versions of ion3, and yet the package maintainers continue to distribute these patched versions and make no mention of the fact that it is unsupported by the author. They also continue to distribute ancient versions of ion3 with the same consequence.<br />
<br />
All the package maintainers had to do was mention the fact that their package was non-standard and unsupported. They refused to do so; you can't really blame Tuomo for being a tad bit irritated about it.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rajj)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>license change</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?238034</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?238034</guid>
			<description>Did you even read the OpenBSD/Arch linux mailing lists?<br />
This Tuomo guy made a total ass out of himself.<br />
What a dick, no wonder his windowmanager is superseded by about 5 alternatives already.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jang)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>wmii</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?238050</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?238050</guid>
			<description>If you like (or think you might like) ion, I recommend that you check out wmii/dwm:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.suckless.org/wiki/wmii" rel="nofollow">http://www.suckless.org/wiki/wmii</a><br />
<br />
It's way simpler and way better, and while the author might be arrogant, he isn't a jerk.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (schala)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Got it and tried it, and its very interesting</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?238304</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?238304</guid>
			<description>Got it, tried it (writing from it now) and its very interesting.  Its a completely get out of the way WM.  No desktop, every app when open is full screen with a tab at the top.  After only a couple of minutes the keyboard shortcuts start to seem like a quicker and simpler way to do things.  Very very fast.  <br />
<br />
The desktop metaphor, overlapping windows, and then the need for multiple desktops to manage all the clutter, and the constant presence of the open file manager on the desktop whether you need it or not - well, its really a revelation to see how little all that stuff is actually needed and the extent to which it just gets in the way of seeing what you are doing.<br />
<br />
I'm fond of fluxbox because its more minimal than the majors, but this takes less is more to a new level and could really grow on anyone who gives it a chance.  Also, if you ever spend any time setting up 'appliances' - basically one app installations - this could be a perfect solution.  <br />
<br />
Very very interesting.  Have to check out wmii now!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (alcibiades)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
