<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17942/AMD_Reveals_Griffin_Puma_Mobile_Platform</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:58:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hurry up AMD!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?241598</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?241598</guid>
			<description>Finally some competition to the highly successful Centrino / Centrino Duo platform!  <br />
<br />
I can't wait.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Looks good</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?241631</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?241631</guid>
			<description>However, as lostcircuits wrote, &quot;...starting with the Venice core, AMD has delivered outstanding performance per Watt.&quot; Check out the diagram at<br />
<br />
www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/low_e/5.shtml<br />
<br />
for example - the Venice core is more than two years old, and Winchester is even older!<br />
<br />
Still, it's refreshing to see how AMD now suddenly takes energy consumption more seriously, adding easy-to-use (transparent) hardware features involving the whole system, instead of passively relying solely on their (fairly advanced) AMD-IBM manufacturing processes (SOI, strained silicon, etc) and CnQ.<br />
<br />
Hopefully, we will soon see some active marketing regarding energy efficiency as well, letting the average customer know AMD is as good as, or even better than, Intel on this.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Henrik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good for us</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?241708</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?241708</guid>
			<description>Good for us consumers if they can give tough competition to other vendors.<br />
GO AMD!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://osgeek.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://osgeek.blogspot.com</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (osgeek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Hurry up AMD!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?241827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?241827</guid>
			<description>Seriously.<br />
<br />
I like AMD, but Centrino laptops have always been more attractive and better supported in the FOSS OSes community. Now with their open drivers and a committed laptop platform, I can start to look at them again. <br />
<br />
Hopefully we'll see some nice thin laptops with high res displays. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Flatland_Spider)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

