<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17956/AfterStep_2_2_6_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:27:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242139</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242139</guid>
			<description>I've an old version of AS installed on a old Slackware box but I don't use it much. On Freshmeat, the last theme for AS was created in 2003. Someome here still use AfterStep? I'm just curious ;-) And what about WMaker? It doesn't get updated often nowaday :|</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rx182)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242232</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242232</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">And what about WMaker? It doesn't get updated often nowaday :|  </div><br />
<br />
I like Window Maker very much. It may not be the best window manager in terms of everyday productivity, but it is very pretty and amazingly fast! I often use it.<br />
<br />
In several previous surveys I have read that a constant % of people use it regularly. The only (-) point is that -as you say- it is not often updated.<br />
<br />
I edit here:<br />
<br />
Give this a try:<br />
<a href="http://themes.freshmeat.net/browse/918/?topic_id=918" rel="nofollow">http://themes.freshmeat.net/browse/918/?topic_id=918</a> Edited 2007-05-22 08:14</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 08:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (isaba)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242269</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242269</guid>
			<description>I don't use AS regularly, but I do use WindowMaker, and I've used it for years. Both AS and WM have a pretty stable userbase.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (alexandru_lz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>changelog</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242289</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242289</guid>
			<description>Good to see it getting development, I'm a big fan of WM and AS.<br />
<br />
Bit of a shame regarding the changelog however, makes it a bit less appealing to try the new version out.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hornett)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242416</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242416</guid>
			<description>The new AS don't use theme at the moment, it uses a &quot;look&quot; file for appearance and a &quot;feel&quot; file for behavior. Several new look have been added recently, they are distributed with AS source. If you combine a feel and a look, you might get what you call a theme.Edited 2007-05-22 20:02</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DrCurl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242503</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242503</guid>
			<description>&quot;And what about WMaker? &quot;<br />
<br />
I use it on my FreeBSD box, it's the best window manager I encountered until today and it works well with my Sun Type 6 keyboard in terms of functionality.<br />
<br />
&quot;It doesn't get updated often nowaday :|&quot;<br />
<br />
Never touch a running system. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Doc Pain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>It seems that &amp;quot;old&amp;quot; window managers are alive and well!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242647</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242647</guid>
			<description>I personally don't use AfterStep but I'm an FVWM user (AfterStep was originally a variant of FVWM). Personally I got tired to all fancy desktop environments and switched back to good old FVWM, the first desktop/window manager I used when I set up my first Slackware system about ten years ago. Coming back to FVWM was like finally returning home after a long (and maybe pointless) journey...<br />
<br />
FVWM doesn't get updated often and why should it? It can already do practically everything I need.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (daemonologist)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Still using AfterStep?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242656</guid>
			<description>In most WMs, themes are all about the &quot;look&quot;, while the &quot;feel&quot; is altered in a configuration file (which also says which theme to use).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bogomipz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
