<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18058/Revisor_Utility_Creates_Custom_Install_Images_for_Fedora</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:23:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>this is a very cool feature</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246483</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246483</guid>
			<description>This ability to create an easy custom spin of Fedora has all kind of interesting options. Say you want a slim system and you just want XFCE, the latest kernel, Compiz and development tools. You could add in all the proprietary MP3, mpeg, realplayer, flash media applications plus nvidia drivers and then bundle it up as an ISO file on a key chain drive. Makes it easy to say try this version of Fedora it is fully loaded. Interesting possibilities here blending your own flavor of a Linux desktop. One would have to be careful about redistributing the blended ISO in the U.S. since the proprietary drivers could create licensing problems.Edited 2007-06-09 02:43</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great feature</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246512</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246512</guid>
			<description>this is a phenomenal feature for many reasons. more and more distros are offering remastering capabilities, hopefully ubuntu will jump on the bandwagon</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 06:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (swarmi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246545</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246545</guid>
			<description>hopefully ubuntu will jump on the bandwagon<br />
<br />
Wait a second you mean Fedora is ahead of the all-popular Ubuntu in technology! This can't be true. I thought Ubuntu had it all. I feel so unpopular now that I might have to switch back to Fedora to claim I am using number 1. (sarcasm).</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246565</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246565</guid>
			<description>haha, I love it!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Calipso)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246567</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246567</guid>
			<description>Ehh, hmmmm, I, hate to a, rain on the ol'sarcasm train with throwing a little infos around . . . but I will. This has indeed been available for Ubuntu for quite some time. <a href="http://uck.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://uck.sourceforge.net/</a>.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (garret)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246570</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246570</guid>
			<description>The difference lies whether upstream/core ubuntu development team supports it _officially_ or not.<br />
All the goodies RH is introducing to fedora is indeed making fedora improving at high speeds. As many have seen in the release notes of F7, the big highlights are:<br />
* Fedora Directory Server<br />
* Mugshot<br />
* Liberation fonts<br />
* revisor<br />
* a more quicker yum<br />
* ...</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Clunixchit)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246617</guid>
			<description>Better Xorg configuration too? I know it detects my display properly.<br />
<br />
I think Ubuntu still uses older methods.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246618</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246618</guid>
			<description>Also, don't forget the improvements to the GUI for easy virtualization. I am pretty happy with 7 right now. It has some bugs to iron out with the new harddrive stack. Once codecbuddy finds its way into version 8 and multimedia codecs can be added via a GUI prompt I think a lot of new users will find it more accommodating.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Far from being a no-brainer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246658</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246658</guid>
			<description>The live CD creation tools packaged for F7 are in my opinion one of the major new features in this release and for my work the most important one.<br />
This being said, I want to acknowledge that it is still far from easy to create a customized live system. I you want to be able to roll your own, you need to know a lot about Fedora Linux, administration, about rpm dependencies and about bash scripting. And you need some nerdy lust for repeated experiments and thourough testing<br />
<br />
The linked article is interesting - still it only touches the surface of the live CD package. For those who want to delve into this I recommend the (not yet complete) documents at <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/LiveCDHowTo" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/LiveCDHowTo</a>  and <a href="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fedora-livecd/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fedora-livecd...</a> <br />
<br />
Also, it is advisable to maintain your on repositories on the network/localhost and to build your own RPMs instead of using the Kickstart-like template files for all changes that need to be applied to the customized live system.<br />
A weekend is nothing. prepare for a week with dark circles around your eyes. Anyway, I already like the modest results I had with F7 better, than what we were able to do with the nevertheless amazing Knoppix toolkit.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dwave)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: woh, stop the music</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?246676</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?246676</guid>
			<description>Fedora 7 is using Xorg 7.3 afaik, which wasn't ready for the last Ubuntu release but will e in the next. It features improved hardware detection.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (slight)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
