<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18124/Introducing_Compiz_Fusion</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:08:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249560</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249560</guid>
			<description>great name: can be taken or understood on different levels;<br />
I am using it actualy on an Ubuntu 'box' and despite some bug and missing some loved plugins (3d by exemple) the new compiz-beryl children seems well born.<br />
Great again and thd of thanks to trevinio for sharing it's compils ...*<br />
Just a, maybe, usefull add, the new site is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.opencompositing.org/Edited" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencompositing.org/Edited</a> 2007-06-21 16:34</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flojlg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good lucky</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249565</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249565</guid>
			<description>I have nothing against this new name... actually, it's very fitting to the project IMHO.<br />
<br />
I wish good luck to the project and hope everyone who contributed to beryl somehow continue to contribute to it with its new face, as contributing to the community is much more important than names and, ultimately, politics.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JrezIN)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249569</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249569</guid>
			<description>There's already VMWare Fusion?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mkools)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249573</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249573</guid>
			<description>Good thing that &quot;VMWare Fusion&quot; starts with &quot;VMWare&quot; and not &quot;Compiz&quot; like &quot;Compiz Fusion&quot; does.<br />
<br />
Although, you're right... someone might confuse Compiz Fusion with Denny's &quot;Fruit Fusion&quot; line of drinks.  Oh noes!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (elanthis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249574</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249574</guid>
			<description>I don't see any problems with that.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (yanik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nice movie</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249577</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249577</guid>
			<description>Heres a nice movie showing off some of the (new) features that will be in the first release of Compiz-Fusion: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Fbk52Mk1w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Fbk52Mk1w</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (maxx_730)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Or the Ford Fusion or the Gilette Fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249581</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249581</guid>
			<description>Or the Ford Fusion or the Gilette Fusion. Pick something else!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stodge)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice movie</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249584</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249584</guid>
			<description>and nice music too!<br />
lol</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flojlg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>More name jokes...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249601</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249601</guid>
			<description>Don't forget nuclear fusion.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nlvivar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Another fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249606</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249606</guid>
			<description>A famous fusion...Brundlefly!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bolomkxxviii)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>great</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249609</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249609</guid>
			<description>Great name, can't wait for a release, this is going to rock!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diego)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>good name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249611</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249611</guid>
			<description>but when does the first compiz fusion code get released?<br />
<br />
and is it based on the compiz 0.5 development code?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (REMF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249616</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249616</guid>
			<description>hmm, if they manage to do that, i wonder how they would vote of bin laden was listed as a candidate for us president...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hehe</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249620</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249620</guid>
			<description>cant wait for fusion and kde4 to be out</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diego)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249621</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249621</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Just a, maybe, usefull add, the new site is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.opencompositing.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencompositing.org/</a> </div><br />
<br />
I think this is also just temporarily. It seems logical to me that they will build a new site on compiz-fusion.orgEdited 2007-06-21 19:19</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (thecas)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249622</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249622</guid>
			<description>If they get rid of &quot;compiz&quot; I think it would be better for the project. We in the open-source community have a lot of, well weird and interesting names and we get used to them when we see them in print.<br />
BUT, please say &quot;compiz&quot; a couple times out loud to another human being and it sounds rather silly.<br />
<br />
Just my 2 cents-I rather liked &quot;Beryl&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Colonel Panic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249629</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249629</guid>
			<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
There's already VMWare Fusion?<br />
&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
<br />
Since they are completely different products, unlikely to be confused, they should be fine from both a trademark law and a community perspective.  I don't really see a problem.<br />
<br />
IBPhoenix is the only entity I can think of who might raise a stink over it, if they had a project named &quot;Fusion&quot;.  And so far as I know, they don't.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249631</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249631</guid>
			<description>I always liked the name &quot;Compiz&quot;.. I would think the kind of people who would be confused/turned off by an unfamiliar sounding name are probably the kind of people who don't need to know what the window manager on their computer is called anyway.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Schmeggma)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249644</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249644</guid>
			<description>I think Compiz is a much more descriptive-sounding name--it makes it clear that it has something to do with compositing. Beryl has a certain ring to it but ultimately brings to mind the metal beryllium rather than anything to do with compositing.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moochman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Solid sounding name</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249663</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249663</guid>
			<description>Compiz Fusion. This sounds solid and is catchy/easy memorable.Browser: Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.0.8462/20; U; en)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dr-ROX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249669</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249669</guid>
			<description>When Gnome and KDE get their own native compositing engines, who will want Compiz?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249670</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249670</guid>
			<description>What we have here is a Compiz fork re-merging with Compiz.  It should be called... Compiz.  There is no &quot;fusion&quot; going on.  It's more like &quot;reconciliation.&quot;  But that's an incredibly bad name.<br />
<br />
If the Beryl folks are so adamant about the resulting name not being simply Compiz, but are willing to accept an extension of that name, then there are better extensions than Fusion.  Maybe something that reflects the nature of the project.  How about... Compiz FX?  Or simply... FX?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (butters)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249679</guid>
			<description>What we have here is a Compiz fork re-merging with Compiz. It should be called... Compiz. There is no &quot;fusion&quot; going on. It's more like &quot;reconciliation.&quot; But that's an incredibly bad name.<br />
<br />
what about &quot;Reunion&quot; then?<br />
uhm, perhaps it sounds a bit too FF7AC-ish, but anyway ... :</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (silix)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice movie</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249693</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249693</guid>
			<description>Hmm, that AddHelper plug-in looks sweet. Does that mean I've got ADD? <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Nilsson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249699</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249699</guid>
			<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
How about... Compiz FX? Or simply... FX?<br />
&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
<br />
How about &quot;Compositing Window Manager&quot;?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249702</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249702</guid>
			<description>I rather like the Compiz name, and it doesn't sound silly.<br />
Actually, here in sweden, we have a very similar word, kompis, that is pronounced the same and means friend/buddy.<br />
What's so silly about that? <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (plague)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Who Cares?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249713</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249713</guid>
			<description>For most users, the name of something that should be seamlessly integrated into whatever distro it winds up in is largely irrelevant.  This sort of functionality should not be seen as a separate application that needs a catchy name.  Frankly, I think it would be better for the major DEs (Gnome, KDE, XFCE) to use whatever code works from Compiz et al and tightly integrate it, and I really don't see Compiz Fusion lasting very long once the DEs have a good compositing solution built-in.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Obscurus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249716</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249716</guid>
			<description>When Gnome and KDE get their own native compositing engines, who will want Compiz?<br />
<br />
Perhaps someone who wants all of those effects.  GNOME will probably not offer many plugins because of their focus on simplicity.  Furthermore compiz already has a large community with a lot of plugins and users.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (abraxas)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>less is more</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249722</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249722</guid>
			<description>GNOME will probably not offer many plugins because of their focus on simplicity.<br />
<br />
Thank you, thank you, thank you for this. I like the Gnome mantra of less is more. It doesn't get in your way and it is not distracting. Also less eye candy gives you better performance.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Compiz?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249790</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249790</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">What we have here is a Compiz fork re-merging with Compiz.  It should be called... Compiz.  There is no &quot;fusion&quot; going on.  It's more like &quot;reconciliation.&quot;  But that's an incredibly bad name.<br />
 </div><br />
<br />
Beryl was fork of compiz, but many of the plugins for beryl were then ported back to compiz. Fusion isn't a bad name, since that's effectively what is happening anyways. <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (elsewhere)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249827</guid>
			<description>Why invest developers' time re-inventing the wheel? Gnome should just bundle Compiz Fusion, only including a few plugins by default (in keeping with their &quot;less is more&quot; philosophy), and then allow the user to add more or turn on more features if they want.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zerohalo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Who gives a fu__ what the name is?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249890</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249890</guid>
			<description>Just show me the CODE.<br />
<br />
For all I care it could be called 'Window Manager'.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Who gives a fu__ what the name is?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249896</guid>
			<description>For all I care it could be called 'Window Manager'.<br />
<br />
Actually, we could call it &quot;The Window Manager&quot;, or &quot;twm&quot; for short.  Oh wait... <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MattPie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?249996</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?249996</guid>
			<description>I've actually heard talk that they're thinking more about replacing Metacity with Compiz rather than putting this stuff into Metacity...<br />
<br />
Main show stopper right now is that Compiz isn't a very complete window manager - no window snapping being the most obvious of the downfalls... when that is done, I'd expect Compiz to replace Metacity.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lunitik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250032</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250032</guid>
			<description>There's a &quot;snapping windows&quot; plugin available in fusion now.<br />
<br />
Adam</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (adamk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Or the Ford Fusion or the Gilette Fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250056</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250056</guid>
			<description>Feisty Fusion, perhaps?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diskinetic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: fusion</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250141</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250141</guid>
			<description>I wouldn't be surprised to see them replace Metacity with Compiz. Isn't that how Metacity came to be, a Gnome compatible window manager that was better than the old one?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bsharitt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What about VMWare?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250164</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250164</guid>
			<description>And let us not forget nuclear fusion.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jbrader)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: hehe</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250228</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250228</guid>
			<description>The only thing I don't like is the &quot;cube&quot; effect.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (juno_106)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: hehe</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250250</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250250</guid>
			<description>So don't use it.  You can switch to the desktop plane or the desktop wall.<br />
<br />
Adam</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (adamk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
