<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18138/The_GNOME_Journal_June_Edition</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:57:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250365</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250365</guid>
			<description>[insert witty comment about the amount of updates for this gnomey journal thingy]<br />
<br />
I've never understood why that &quot;news/article-site&quot; even exists. It's only got 4 updates a year...<br />
<br />
Anyway, the gstreamer article was interesting.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (weirdnut)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250371</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250371</guid>
			<description>indeed, is there any decent up-to-date websites that match dot.kde.org for gnome stuff?<br />
<br />
I'm a recent convert to gnome, but websites lacking discussion is pretty huge it appears <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nighty5)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250372</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250372</guid>
			<description><a href="http://gnomedesktop.org/" rel="nofollow">http://gnomedesktop.org/</a><br />
<a href="http://planet.gnome.org/news/" rel="nofollow">http://planet.gnome.org/news/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Daniel Borgmann)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250382</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250382</guid>
			<description>Remember: GNOME Journal is an online magazine, not a news site. We only publish original content and this takes more time than just referencing existing articles from other websites.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lucasr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250390</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250390</guid>
			<description>Although you're right about that there aren't many updates, perhaps you could have thought about the fact that people are doing this in their spare time. Please show some respect. <br />
<br />
Yes, it's a pity and I wish that there would be more articles (also maybe more articles for users, hint hint <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> , but I enjoy every article they publish. Thanks!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (neutron)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250392</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250392</guid>
			<description>Touche.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250416</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250416</guid>
			<description>Don't just assume someone's trying to disrespect another one's job <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  I am just a bit sad, because it looks like it wants to be like <a href="http://dot.kde.org" rel="nofollow">http://dot.kde.org</a> (but for Gnome instead).<br />
<br />
Again, don't get my previous post wrong please, I was just trying to say how much I would like to see much more news about Gnome <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2007-06-25 13:00</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (weirdnut)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250435</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250435</guid>
			<description><a href="http://dot.kde.org" rel="nofollow">http://dot.kde.org</a> is a mix of original articles and aggregated content.  If you want original articles about GNOME you can look at <a href="http://gnomejournal.org" rel="nofollow">http://gnomejournal.org</a>. If you are looking for aggregated information, look at <a href="http://gnomedesktop.org" rel="nofollow">http://gnomedesktop.org</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Weird site!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250437</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250437</guid>
			<description>Don't just assume someone's trying to disrespect another one's job <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  I am just a bit sad, because it looks like it wants to be like <a href="http://dot.kde.org" rel="nofollow">http://dot.kde.org</a> (but for Gnome instead).<br />
<br />
Yer. Dot KDE has been a great news servant for KDE over the years, and people like Navindra Umanee deserve a lot of credit for doing a lot of grunt work (and I mean grunt) on it over the years.<br />
<br />
I suppose it will just take something more exciting happening in the Gnome world for perhaps a couple of people to get excited about writing more news happenings.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>gstreamer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250440</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250440</guid>
			<description>That gstreamer article was a good read.  It's interesting that gstreamer is kind of starting to move into jack territory, and I've seen a couple of composition applications using gstreamer for their backends instead.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (markbrophy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>lack of articles/updates..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250462</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250462</guid>
			<description>The reason you don't get a lot of updates is two fold:<br />
<br />
1) we are a small group of people who have very busy lives and we have to balance the time between working on GNOME, day lives, and other matters.  If we can grow the group then we can probably get a regular schedule going as other people can cover.<br />
<br />
If you want to see regular updates that feel free to volunteer your time.  We'd love to see more people and you need not be a technical person.  If you're a technical person and you have non-technical friends who might want to know &quot;what all the big deal is about desktop&quot; then encourage them to join the Journal since really a lot of the time we are dealing with people not the technology.<br />
<br />
2) Do you know how hard it is to find people who are willing to write?  It's quite difficult, it requires a combination of bullying and cajoling to get people to write.  So sometimes there is a lag because we need people to write/research a particular topic.<br />
<br />
So yes, it is a bit chaotic but it can be improved if some of you are willing to put in some time and help us.<br />
<br />
sri<br />
GNOME Journal contributor</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sramkrishna)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Segedunum, you can't help but to troll Gnome threads</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250554</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250554</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I suppose it will just take something more exciting happening in the Gnome world for perhaps a couple of people to get excited about writing more news happenings. </div><br />
<br />
You're not a KDE developer, but you have an unhealthy attachment to KDE, where no matter what, you can't help but to express your bitterness.  There's probably fanboy support groups that can help you with your problem.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lambda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Competing with KDE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?250631</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?250631</guid>
			<description>I'd love to see a major Gnome version to compete with KDE 4 :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (juno_106)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Segedunum, you can't help but to troll Gnome threads</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?251044</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?251044</guid>
			<description>You're not a KDE developer, but you have an unhealthy attachment to KDE, where no matter what, you can't help but to express your bitterness. There's probably fanboy supp........................<br />
<br />
Whatever sweetheart. I very rarely comment on Gnome threads actually, so it just shows where you and a lot of others comment and where you get that perception from ;-).<br />
<br />
The fact is that, from where an awful lot of people sit, there just doesn't seem to be an awful lot happening with Gnome on a daily, commit by commit, basis. There's no detailed commit digest, no detailed description of what is being committed, nothing really to get very excited about, no Gnome 3.0 anywhere on the horizon and the whole thing seems to have got diluted by many core developers having diverging corporate interests. As a community, it just seems to lack.........cohesion.<br />
<br />
I don't think anyone is remiss in pointing that out and commenting on it. Sorry, if you feel upset. Maybe you can get some help for that and contribute usefully to the discussion and points raised?Edited 2007-06-27 19:37</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
