<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18339/IBM_Launches_16-Core_Processor_Server</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:42:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>That's a hardcore system.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?258640</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?258640</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The i570 can support up to 160 virtual server partitions... </div><br />
Not bad for a system originally designed for small to medium sized businesses. Looks like IBM is heading for ultra flexible as well.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">The company also introduced a new &quot;pay-as-you-use&quot; pricing structure, in which users start from one of three base System i configurations and add processing power and functions, such as transaction processing, on a per-processor basis. </div><br />
seems to me that this alone will make the system interesting for medium business database servers as hedging your bets becomes less mistake prone.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SReilly)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>16-Core Processor Server</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?258699</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?258699</guid>
			<description>A processor server - sounds like something from Plan9!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: 16-Core Processor Server</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?258713</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?258713</guid>
			<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
A processor server - sounds like something from Plan9!<br />
&quot;&quot;&quot;<br />
<br />
The movie or the Operating System? ;-)Edited 2007-07-27 15:13</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: 16-Core Processor Server</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?258740</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?258740</guid>
			<description>This is a OS news site so of course the movie.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mongoslam)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>System i is the most scalable system IBM makes</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?259190</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?259190</guid>
			<description>These systems that are coming out now benchmark really well, and they're not even running hw/sw tuned for the chip -- that's coming next year.<br />
<br />
The interesting thing about the &quot;i&quot; isn't the hardware.  The operating system is extremely interesting from a computer science point of view.  Concepts that are becoming interesting -- managed memory, &quot;fat&quot; binaries for portability are two that come to mind -- are things similar to what the OS has had since its inception nearly 30 years ago.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rdean400)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
