<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18514/10_Year_Anniversary_Blast_from_the_Past</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:06:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>CNet and Predictions</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265976</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265976</guid>
			<description>&quot;C/net is exposing the future Betamaxes and 8 track tapes of the technology world in a column entitled &quot;10 Technologies that Don't Stand a Chance.&quot; Judge for yourself. BTW, <b>one of those doomed technologies is Java.</b>&quot;<br />
<br />
Some things never change, like CNet's predictions. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (linumax)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wow, that's fast!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265979</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265979</guid>
			<description>&quot;Macosrumors is also reporting that according to Motorola, the Power PC architecture has a lot of potential. How much? How about one gigahertz (1,000 MHz). (!)&quot;<br />
<br />
Blazing!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fignew)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sigh</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265980</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265980</guid>
			<description>From September 29th:<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">And you thought Mac users were die hards . . . Amiga users are hopeful since Gateway purchased the pioneering Amiga OS. </div><br />
<br />
Here we are ten years later... still waiting. In retrospect, Gateway was apparently the only serious candidate, and even they weren't serious about it. When they found out what Jim Collas had in mind, that was the end of that.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jack_perry)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265981</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265981</guid>
			<description>Three websites had their acts in order, and managed to maintain URLs for nearly 10 years:<br />
<br />
C|Net (2 of 3)<br />
AppleInsider (1 of 1)<br />
StepWise (1 of 1)<br />
<br />
Other than that, the web is like a virtual Library of Alexandria.  It has all these tantilizing hints as to the volumes of information that it once contained, but which were destroyed by the savage hoards (website admins).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MacTO)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>stagnation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265982</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265982</guid>
			<description>while there's been a lot of exciting developments in the last ten years, I'm still surprised to see how stagnant the industry has been.  The same key players are there, the Amiga and OS/2 stories are  similar to what we see here these days.<br />
<br />
Has the industry matured, or is it being held back?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (richmassena)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: CNet and Predictions</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265983</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265983</guid>
			<description>Beta tapes are still around for pro use: Betacam, Betacam SP, Digital Betacam. So what if Beta<i>max</i> is dead?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Johann Chua)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265984</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265984</guid>
			<description>The Way Back Machine is your friend...  Just prefix <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/*/</a> to any of the dead links there, and (hopefully) you'll get to see the content.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pablo_marx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>dead links</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265988</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265988</guid>
			<description>seeing all these dead links, makes me feel bad - we ARE loosing our history on the web, aren't we?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (superstoned)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: stagnation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265990</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265990</guid>
			<description>It has been held back for sure. And every economist can tell you why. Monopolies tend to do that...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (superstoned)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great minds think alike</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265991</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265991</guid>
			<description>In 1997 -<br />
The Computer My Mom Needs<br />
By Joanne Rodgers<br />
<a href="http://www.osnews.com/1997osnews/oped/11.97/mom.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/1997osnews/oped/11.97/mom.html</a> <br />
<br />
In 2007 -<br />
The Return Of The 8 Bits?<br />
By Michael Reed<br />
<a href="http://www.osnews.com/story.php/17723/The-Return-Of-The-8-Bits" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story.php/17723/The-Return-Of-The-8-Bits</a> <br />
<br />
Great minds think alike. Mine just works much, much more slowly than hers ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rhyder)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: CNet and Predictions</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265993</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265993</guid>
			<description>I loved the quality of Betamax tapes in comparison to VHS and S-VHS.<br />
<br />
Nowadays however, they will not make me fall into the trap of buying 2 standards... HD-DVD or BluRay ? pffff<br />
<br />
keep them, my dvd/divx player is good enough for me.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raver31)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265994</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265994</guid>
			<description>From the link above for the Internet Archive Wayback Machine..<br />
<br />
Data Retrieval Failure.<br />
<br />
We're sorry. We were unable to retrieve the requested data. We may be experiencing technical difficulties and suggest that you try again later.<br />
See the FAQs for more info and help, or contact us.<br />
<br />
Priceless</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raver31)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hahaha</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265998</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265998</guid>
			<description>java a doomed technology, now look at it, good work osnews people.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (liamdawe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?265999</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?265999</guid>
			<description>Also, do bear in mind that there is no backup of the Internet Archive. This is a basement run project using entirely legacy hardware. If a hard disk dies, that's a whole chunk of Internet history lost right there. Scary when you think about it.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: CNet and Predictions</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266003</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266003</guid>
			<description>I want to get <i>The Wings of Honneamise</i> on DVD.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, the upcoming re-release from Bandai Visual USA only bundles the DVD with the Blu-ray and HD-DVD editions, not as a stand-alone. That and using Japanese price levels ($80) for the U.S. market makes me a bit leary, not to mention the cost of an HD player.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Johann Chua)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266007</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266007</guid>
			<description>My god. This makes me think.<br />
<br />
However, Wikipedia reports that &quot;It is a member of the American Library Association and is officially recognized by the State of California as a library.&quot; -doesn't it mean it has some funding?Edited 2007-08-27 10:03</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (devurandom)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266009</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266009</guid>
			<description><i>Also, do bear in mind that there is no backup of the Internet Archive. This is a basement run project using entirely legacy hardware. If a hard disk dies, that's a whole chunk of Internet history lost right there. Scary when you think about it.</i><br />
<br />
That is the reason mirror sites exists</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Fransexy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: stagnation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266011</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266011</guid>
			<description><i>while there's been a lot of exciting developments in the last ten years, I'm still surprised to see how stagnant the industry has been. The same key players are there, the Amiga  stories are similar to what we see here these days.</i><br />
<br />
The Amiga seems it has been trapped in a time loop.It´s all the time the same history again and again with different players.The Amiga universe collapsed in a black hole?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Fransexy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>......</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266015</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266015</guid>
			<description>If thats the original intro page @ link then me likes.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (islander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266021</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266021</guid>
			<description>This is a basement run project using entirely legacy hardware. If a hard disk dies, that's a whole chunk of Internet history lost right there. Scary when you think about it.<br />
<br />
I don't see how scary it is to lose crappy HTML pages from 1997. If the hard disk died most people would never know. It would be as eventful as a blade of grass dieing on a prairie. ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xmms...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266022</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266022</guid>
			<description>pity xmms couldn't stick around lol</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pllb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266023</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266023</guid>
			<description>Web development has evolved over the years, as has technology, but it would be a mistake to let 'old things' that are 'crap' be destroyed because we have newer things now. Should we demolish the great wall of china, the pyramids of Egypt and the Parthenon of Greece? I think not.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mini-me)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Are there mirrors?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266029</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266029</guid>
			<description>There are mirrors for the wayback machine?? COuld you front us some links to those or were you just being sarcastic?<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Google ads</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266031</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266031</guid>
			<description>Wow, they had Google ad sense back in 1997!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (adinas)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Google ads</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266034</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266034</guid>
			<description>Welcome to the new web, same as the old web.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: xmms...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266035</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266035</guid>
			<description>You want to take a peek at Audacious.<br />
<a href="http://audacious-media-player.org/" rel="nofollow">http://audacious-media-player.org/</a><br />
Audacious is a fork of Beep Media Player, which itself was a fork of XMMS.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Constantine XVI)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wow, that's fast! (not too much progress)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266036</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266036</guid>
			<description>What was the upper level speed of the Motorola chip on the consumer market before Apple went to Intel?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (libray)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>1997-2007</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266041</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266041</guid>
			<description>Amiga lives.<br />
OS/2 lives.<br />
BeOS rules.<br />
Linux is ready for the desktop.<br />
Windows sucks.<br />
<br />
It's incredible how that 1997 looks like this 2007.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (biffuz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: CNet and Predictions</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266063</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266063</guid>
			<description>A quick look at the internet archive shows that they predicted the following technologies would fail:<br />
<br />
1) Push content<br />
2) ISDN<br />
3) 56k modems<br />
4) Internet phones<br />
5) NetPC<br />
6) Spam-blocking software<br />
7) PDAs<br />
8) PC TV<br />
9) Java<br />
<br />
Interestingly enough, most of these really didn't fail, but morphed into a slightly different, but ultimately successful technology.<br />
<br />
- Push content: Morphed into RSS feeds and RSS aggregators. <br />
- 56k modems: Substantial broadband penetration took a long time; 56k modems certainly had they heyday.<br />
- Internet phones: VOIP anyone? Vonage, etc?<br />
- Spam-blocking software: It's integrated into everything now.<br />
- PDAs: The &quot;PDA&quot; market proper is waning, but I don't think smartphones and the iPhone are fundamentally different devices<br />
- PC TV: Interestingly enough, all three major US networks have many of their TV shows available via streaming on their websites; of course, torrenting TV shows is huge too<br />
- Java: Never succeeded properly in client space, but absolutely took over server space, which no one saw coming</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rayiner)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Op-ed Roffle</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266135</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266135</guid>
			<description>&quot;Ending Mac OS licensing has many Apple fanatics up in arms, but the Mac's days are numbered. Like it or not, the most compelling technologies in Apple's future are a modern operating system mated to cheap, easy to configure Network Computers.&quot;<br />
<br />
Yay!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gypsumfantastic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Google ads</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266208</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266208</guid>
			<description>Actually, the pages were querying a now-defunct ad network called &quot;spinbox.&quot;  One search and replace later, Google ads!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Congratulations are in order ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266211</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266211</guid>
			<description>That's probably what the layperson said when the Library of Alexandria burned down. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandria" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandria</a> <br />
<br />
Now, mind you, there is doubtlessly plenty of crap in those internet archives, but I think it rather rash of you to declare that it's all junk just because most people won't take the time to sift through it.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moochman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>some wayback links to the stories</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266784</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266784</guid>
			<description>10 Technologies that Don't Stand a Chance.<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19990224185426/www.cnet.com/Content/Features/Dlife/Failure/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19990224185426/www.cnet.com/Content/Feat...</a> <br />
<br />
Ralph Nader &amp; The Microsft Menace<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19971210223956/<a href="http://www.slate.com/Features/NaderMS/NaderMS.asp"" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/Features/NaderMS/NaderMS.asp"</a> rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19971210223956/<a href="http://www.slate.com/Feat...</a>" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/Feat...</a></a> <br />
<br />
MacWeek on Rhapsody<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19990219165533/macweek.zdnet.com/mw_1142/op_macintouch.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19990219165533/macweek.zdnet.com/mw_1142...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KLU9)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>some more wayback links</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266790</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266790</guid>
			<description>What's an OS? IE-Windows integration - Wired<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19990220011903/<a href="http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/7933.html"" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/7933.html"</a> rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19990220011903/<a href="http://www.wired.com/news...</a>" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/news...</a></a> <br />
<br />
Omega's COS: a rival Mac OS - MacWeek<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19990428114115/macweek.zdnet.com/mw_1141/sy_omega.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19990428114115/macweek.zdnet.com/mw_1141...</a> <br />
<br />
Amiga Lives! Purchased by Gateway - ZDnet<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19990116232124/<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/content/zdnn/0926/zdnn0014.html"" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/content/zdnn/0926/zdnn0014.html"</a> rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19990116232124/<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn...</a>" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn...</a></a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KLU9)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>yet more</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?266793</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?266793</guid>
			<description>Ellison's Network Computer Crashes &amp; Burns<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19971211215337/<a href="http://www.currents.net/newstoday/97/09/25/news1.html"" rel="nofollow">http://www.currents.net/newstoday/97/09/25/news1.html"</a> rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19971211215337/<a href="http://www.currents.net/n...</a>" rel="nofollow">http://www.currents.net/n...</a></a> <br />
<br />
The BeOS Newsletter of 19th Sept. 1997<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19971022021704/<a href="http://www.be.com/aboutbe/benewsletter/Issue91.html"" rel="nofollow">http://www.be.com/aboutbe/benewsletter/Issue91.html"</a> rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/19971022021704/<a href="http://www.be.com/aboutbe...</a>" rel="nofollow">http://www.be.com/aboutbe...</a></a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KLU9)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
