<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18571/Intel_Unveils_Tigerton_Quad-Core_Chip</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:53:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Intel is kickin' it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?268998</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?268998</guid>
			<description>...with 45 nanometer manufacturing, and 32 nanometer planned for 2009. Man, these guys don't mess around.<br />
<br />
I hope AMD starts caching up. Barcelona is supposed to be out soon but man, are they lagging. At least AMD have a decent memory controller architecture.<br />
<br />
Does anybody have any news on if/when Intel plans on integrating memory controllers on die?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SReilly)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Intel is kickin' it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269020</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269020</guid>
			<description><a href="http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT082807020032" rel="nofollow">http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT082807020032</a> <br />
<br />
You could start by reading that.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Marcellus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Intel is kickin' it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269040</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269040</guid>
			<description>Thanks. That was a very interesting and informative read. It also answered my question very well.<br />
<br />
I always wondered why Intel was still sticking with the front side bus and this article explains that very nicely.<br />
<br />
I'm really looking forward to the family of CSI implementations and what kind of impact it will have on throughput. Guess I'll have to wait a few years more before seeing an implementation for the desktop.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SReilly)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I suppose XServe will see an update soon</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269121</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269121</guid>
			<description>along with the next revision of the Mac Pro.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tyrione)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i hope</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269122</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269122</guid>
			<description>that intel will soooon put the yorksfield into a store near me!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Redeeman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Intel is kickin' it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269307</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269307</guid>
			<description>&quot;While Intel's platform engineers devised more and more creative ways to improve multiprocessor performance using the front-side bus, a highly scalable next generation interconnect was being jointly designed by engineers from teams across Intel and some of the former Alpha designers acquired from Compaq.&quot;<br />
<br />
...I might add that those alpha engineers were acquired from DEC.  <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
It's a serious matter, how to transition to different technologies like that, when everyone is mired in FSB technology.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nope</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269393</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269393</guid>
			<description>Xserve and Mac Pro use Xeon DP 5xxx, not Xeon MP 7xxx.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wes Felter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nope</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269398</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269398</guid>
			<description>Now.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tyrione)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Nope</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?269401</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?269401</guid>
			<description>I doubt Apple will start making 4-socket Macs since they'd be very expensive and few customers would benefit from them.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wes Felter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
