<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18678/Microsoft_Confirms_Lineup_for_Mac_Office_2008</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:30:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Someone has to say it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274328</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274328</guid>
			<description>...so I will.<br />
<br />
Will Excel 2008 be able to multiply?  (See <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/24/2339203" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/24/2339203</a>  for more details)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TheMatt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274335</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274335</guid>
			<description>Too late, too many versions, too expensive. I switched to iWork and I love it.<br />
<br />
Office is a good product (Shame on you Widows team), but I'm just not using it to the level I used to years ago. Sorry Microsoft, but laggy PPC-only Office 2004 has been annoying for quite some while.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No Need for M$ Office</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274338</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274338</guid>
			<description>When you have NeoOffice.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.neooffice.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.neooffice.org/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Macrat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No Need for M$ Office</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274343</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274343</guid>
			<description>dont know why you were modded down!!<br />
<br />
I use neooffice quite happily on my mac! I have office x 'just incase' but I dont think ive needed to use it for about 2/3 years now<br />
<br />
work is a different matter though, my boss is a firm beliver in a single platform office so i am not allowed to use openoffice :-(</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Will it be compatible with the windows version?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274347</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274347</guid>
			<description>Last I heard it couldn't do the scripting properly, which could easily sink it in an corporate world who loves those little scripts. It's been pretty quiet about all of that for some reason.<br />
<br />
It feels like Office is where Microsoft really could be hurt, because if they can't sell that cash cow, they only have Vista left to make them money.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John.Gustafsson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No Need for M$ Office</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274348</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274348</guid>
			<description>Agree.  NeoOffice works fine on my MacBook.<br />
<br />
When it catches up to v2.3 it'll be even better.<br />
<br />
No thank you Bill, I'd rather not.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Cutterman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>It's nice to see how much money I will be saving .</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274350</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274350</guid>
			<description>It's nice to see how much money I will be saving because I don't buy Microsoft products. Between iWork and NeoOffice I only spent $79 plus tax and $320.95 (plus the different in taxes) to spend on other things. Or ... to put into savings.<br />
<br />
PS: Nobody at work or at home can tell I don't use Microsoft products at all even though I share documents, spreadsheets, etc., with them.<br />
<br />
PSS: Don't forget. If you think buying MS Office for Macs is more compatible because of scripts ... uh, the new version doesn't support visual basic. Oops.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sabon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Someone has to say it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274359</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274359</guid>
			<description>LOL<br />
I was laughing about that earlier today.  Speculation is that &quot;10000&quot; appeared in the code when it should've been &quot;0x10000&quot;.  OOPS!<br />
<br />
Slashdot posters are saying it's a display bug rather than a calculation error (because graphs still display properly and calculations built on the incorrect cells give correct values).  But even if the underlying data is correct, it's still a MAJOR screw-up for the display of the data to be wrong, particularly for cases where human-beings are eye-balling the spreadsheet themselves (rather than just feeding them into larger calculations).<br />
<br />
Huge embarrasment for the Excel team, which I gather is one of Microsoft's most proud teams.<br />
<br />
&quot;Will Excel 2008 be able to multiply?&quot;<br />
<br />
Well, if it doesn't, then MacBU would be even more embarrassed since the bug is known well before they'll ship. :pEdited 2007-09-25 20:18</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MollyC)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: It's nice to see how much money I will be saving .</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274364</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274364</guid>
			<description>PS: Nobody at work or at home can tell I don't use Microsoft products at all even though I share documents, spreadsheets, etc., with them.<br />
<br />
I'm pleased to hear that.  NeoOffice says it's based on OpenOffice, which is the only one I use (on GNU/Linux).  I don't do much exchanging, but if I do, I want Windows zombies to be able to read what I wrote without problems.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KenJackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fantastic! </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274365</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274365</guid>
			<description>Hopefully we'll begin seeing an all new and improved version of MS Office every single year (for $399). Next best thing to a subscription service.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anomie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>oo.org</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274451</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274451</guid>
			<description>what happened to all that stuff we heard 2 years ago about the x11 version of open office being dropped on os x in favor of an aqua version? i haven't heard any news since the initial onslaught.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (broken_symlink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: oo.org</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274460</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274460</guid>
			<description>I believe that's precisely what others in this discussion are referring to: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/features.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/features.php</a><br />
<br />
That what you had in mind?Edited 2007-09-26 01:33</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anomie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>You mean this?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274462</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274462</guid>
			<description><a href="http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/download/aqua.html" rel="nofollow">http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/download/aqua.html</a> <br />
<br />
Its actually pretty stable for an alpha.<br />
<br />
IBM has recently made Lotus Symphony available for free.  Its an office suite which supports the Open Document format.  IBM has announced they are working on a Mac version of it to be out in 2008.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jocknerd)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Someone has to say it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274486</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274486</guid>
			<description>A followup on the Excel 2007 bug, straight from the Excel team's blog:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2007/09/25/calculation-issue-update.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2007/09/25/calculation-issue-up...</a> <br />
<br />
The fix is going thru internal testing and should be released soon.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MollyC)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: No Need for M$ Office</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274500</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274500</guid>
			<description>I guess it's only on OSNews where you'll find people so keen on NeoOffice. I use it on my Macbook for those rare documents that are sent to me in OO format. Other wise, I just leave it alone. That thing runs slower than MS Office 2004 which is running under emulation on my Mac. <br />
<br />
Thanks, but no thanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (evangs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Hopefully one of the last of a dying breed...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?274644</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?274644</guid>
			<description>Personally, I hope MS Office doesn't have much fight left in it.  The price is just absurd, and while OO.org might not be perfect and might have some obnoxious formatting issues, I can put up with all that knowing that I have saved three to five hundred dollars.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (HelbaDot)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
