<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18708/_RISC_OS_on_Linux_Releases_Alpha_Live_CD</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:20:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I object to the term Risc OS on Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275591</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275591</guid>
			<description>It should be Risc/Linux I will not reply to further comments except to people who use the term Risc/Linux not Linux.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cyclops)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275592</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275592</guid>
			<description>I'd like to see how this progresses during Beta. My biggest worries are fundamental &quot;Linux-isms&quot; plaguing the design in the final product. A Linux WM with a RISC OS skin, RISC OS does not make. RISC OS is a good OS because the way it is designed from the ground up. I wish them the best in creating something that maintains the innovative and fun process behind RISC OS.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275593</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275593</guid>
			<description>Write a greasemonkey script to rename that for you, and then grow up.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275594</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275594</guid>
			<description>I've a feeling your sarcasm detector is somewhat off, either that or this place has actually become Slashdot in the past few days.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MYOB)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275673</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275673</guid>
			<description>No it should be Rofl/Risc/GNU/Linux <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ah RISCOS...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275679</guid>
			<description>... I turned on my A7000 the other day. Then I shut it down again, happy in the knowledge I can leave it off for another 6 months and not feel like I never use it anymore. If anybody can source me an RISCPC ethernet card dead cheap, maybe I'd use it more often though ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (memson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>vmware</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275689</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275689</guid>
			<description>Anyone had any luck making this work under vmware? seems to be an issue with not have access to the frame buffer fb0/dev</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flibble)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why not just run RiscOS?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275715</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275715</guid>
			<description>It's not like RiscOS is dead, after all.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Downix)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ugly</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275747</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275747</guid>
			<description>And the interface is still as ugly as it ever was. And this coming from a guy who doesn't mind Irix's 4dwm.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tbcpp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Ah RISCOS...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?275893</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?275893</guid>
			<description>i might be abke to help there depend on what you think a price is and if you can wait until i get to my secret riscos box neil at cloudsprinter flop com</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nexie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?276321</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?276321</guid>
			<description>ROFL!<br />
<br />
... or ROLF?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
