http://www.osnews.com/story/18719/A_Review_of_Online_Photo_Services Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:12:32 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif http://www.osnews.com http://osnews.com/thread?275952 http://osnews.com/thread?275952 It could not be suitable as a photo sharing site (it doesn't have the most part of features in the article), but since myspace is included I think deviantart should be mentioned, at least because it is one of the sites with more talented photographers in the net.
(For the records, you know, somebody could not need uploading 2500 photos, sliding shows, batch capabilities, etc...) Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:14:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (yiyus) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?275987 http://osnews.com/thread?275987 How on Earth wasn't Zenfolio mentioned?

It's amongst, if not the biggest photo hosting out there, and it's very good. Nice clean interface, easy, unlimited storage for your photos and some stupid amount of transfer rate a month for about $50AU/year.

I just finished testing out a lot of those myself recently, Zenfolio was definitely the highest recommended and best to use. Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:56:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Finchwizard) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276018 http://osnews.com/thread?276018 No Shutterfly? I would say that this review is incomplete at best. Gather them all, then try again. You could also do comparison charts with features that would really break it down nicely.

It's OS News. Not OS 1/2 News. Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:43:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Pythor) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276021 http://osnews.com/thread?276021 So we're going to play this game? The "you didn't include every single site on the internet therefore the entire review is bunk" game?

Please. Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:56:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Minty Fresh) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276043 http://osnews.com/thread?276043 I've been using Flickr for years but recently I've begun moving everything over to fotologue, a Japanese site (but in English). It has a great look about it, supports tags and has a great community.

http://fotologue.jp/ Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:06:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Vinegar Joe) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276052 http://osnews.com/thread?276052 Never heard of it. Maybe the reviewer didn't know either? Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:58:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (flanque) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276053 http://osnews.com/thread?276053 I look forward to you complete and thorough review.

Please ensure Thom knows about it so he can restore the other half of credibility this site has. Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:01:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (flanque) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276054 http://osnews.com/thread?276054 I use Webshots and find it more than adequate for my needs. Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:02:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (flanque) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276055 http://osnews.com/thread?276055 Panaramio ?

This is the best photo sharing site, in that it allows you to stick your photos as featured content onto google earth..

here is a taster..

http://www.panoramio.com/user/198559 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 05:41:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (raver31) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276290 http://osnews.com/thread?276290 Anyone serious about uploading pictures will have to pay something. For mac users .mac ($100) may have more sense now with 10GB, Leopard new features and the nice webgallery integrated with iPhoto. Another interesting option I may choose is the family pack with 5 accounts and 20GB in all. Also you can get a reduction of 30$ when buying a new mac. Fri, 05 Oct 2007 05:27:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (ernipiggy) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276335 http://osnews.com/thread?276335 > family pack with 5 accounts and 20GB in all

And that costs over $100 (per year, I suppose)? That's insanely expensive!!! In a few years I've already taken 10 GiB of photos, and with the rest of my family included we have over 30 GiB. Photography enthusiasts might easily have ten times that.
(And here I thought SmugMug was expensive with its $40/year with unlimited storage.) Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:26:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (msundman) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?276355 http://osnews.com/thread?276355 That wasn't my intention. I want to make clear that I don't think "the entire review is bunk", but I think it is good that comments fill the gaps of the article, and if all we give constructive comments it can be more useful for people who find the article in google looking for his perfect photo sharing site (for example). Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:58:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (yiyus) Comments