<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/18919/Six_Months_with_Sony_Vegas</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:54:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Multi language support lacking.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284396</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284396</guid>
			<description>I don't know about the competition, but one of the things missing in Vegas is a multilanguage support. Only English, German, French and Spanish are available. Smaller language communities (e.g. Dutch) are left out in the cold.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ivan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Multi language support lacking.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284398</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284398</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"> Smaller language communities (e.g. Dutch) are left out in the cold.  </div><br />
<br />
Larger language communities (e.g Russian) are left out in the cold too.<br />
Often the translation (if there is one) is horrible/unreadable.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (IceCubed)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Any suggestions for NVE on Linux?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284399</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284399</guid>
			<description>I have been running Kino for some time now first on OpenSUSE, now on Kubuntu and it works. No fancy effects, just the basics - trimming and some basic effects. But it actually works. I would like to find some better app for video editing but do not want to switch platforms just for this (I do edit videos just one in i while..).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (joeprusa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>cinelerra</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284400</guid>
			<description>There is cinelerra <a href="http://cvs.cinelerra.org/" rel="nofollow">http://cvs.cinelerra.org/</a>  for linux, but i havent used it in a long time.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nulleight)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Multi language support lacking.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284402</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284402</guid>
			<description>Well ... it prolly does not justify the cost. I dont think native dutch or russian version would add a lot to sonys pockets. Face the fact that those little or poor countries without a good language standard <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" />  are left out for a reason.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kragil)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Multi language support lacking.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284405</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284405</guid>
			<description>Premiere Elements comes in Dutch. It is also strongly marketed here. Not so for Vegas. Vegas is also kept a secret on sites such as Zdnet.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ivan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284414</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284414</guid>
			<description>but this application processes and creates propritary Sony video formats. No professional wants that.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ralf.)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284420</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284420</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"> but this application processes and creates propritary Sony video formats. No professional wants that. </div><br />
<br />
Please allow me to correct your information:<br />
<br />
Vegas works with 'what-ever-codec' is installed in the system, ranging from Video for Windows codecs (like old DivX 3) and latest MPEG4 codecs, even Quicktime.<br />
<br />
It properly support exporting to MPEG2, AVI DV, DV (raw, which maps to .dv files under linux) and other formats, even OGG.<br />
<br />
BTW, was the first NLE to ship with Audio exporting to OGG.<br />
<br />
I use Vegas Video 7.0 every day. One thing to note was left of out of the review is that Vegas allow you multiple instances of the application, which let you work on other projects while exporting or doing some rendering. YMMV due hardware requirements, but on Core2Duo I can have 2 or 3 instances working without too much problems.<br />
<br />
Also, the velocity envelopes concept implemented in Vegas is more close to the audio editing concept than video, which make timeline handling a really big thing compared to strcit NLE like Premiere or Canopus EDIUS.<br />
<br />
Plugins support also came from proDAD (a german firm) who makes Adorage, Vitascene and Heroglyph using the DirectX plugin architecture that Vegas provides.<br />
<br />
OK, just my comments ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (LuisLavena)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284421</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284421</guid>
			<description>It imports and exports far more than just Sony video formats. Get your facts straight. <br />
<br />
Supported Formats<br />
Import: AIFF, ATRAC, AVI, BMP, GIF, JPG, MMV, MP3, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, Sony M2TS, OGG, PCA, PNG, PSD, QuickTime®, SFA, SWF, TGA, TIF, W64, WAV, WMA, WMV<br />
<br />
Export: AC-3, ATRAC, AVI, MP3, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, OGG, PCA, QuickTime, RealAudio®, RealVideo®, W64, WAV, WMA, WMV<br />
<br />
I use Vegas Home Studio Platinum, and it's a very powerful tool for $70.<br />
<br />
EDIT - Luis beat me to it <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2007-11-14 14:34</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (polaris20)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>But it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284425</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284425</guid>
			<description>doesnt run on linux :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hibridmatthias)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: But it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284426</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284426</guid>
			<description>doesnt run on linux :-)<br />
<br />
Neither does Photoshop, Premiere, Cubase, Sonar, Avid, Pro Tools, Reason, Halion, Logic, and a ton of other creative applications that have no real equivalent on Linux. <br />
<br />
Unfortunately these software vendors choose not to code for Linux, which is unfortunate.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (polaris20)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>funny</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284433</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284433</guid>
			<description>hoho, the first time that I read the Subject of this post, I thought that Sony Vegas was a personal name... ( Sony Vegas.. Who is this guy? ) hohoho</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bsdero)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284434</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284434</guid>
			<description>AVCHD, HDV and XDCAM are interpretet by the software according to Sonys implementation. If your source material comes from an JVC camera, for example, you may run into problems.<br />
<br />
Thats what I meant with &quot;propritary&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ralf.)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: funny</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284435</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284435</guid>
			<description>Never heard of vegas myself. Only saw it on some cracking  and p2p sites. When i deal with graphic artists and other professionals i get the impression they are more Apple centred.Edited 2007-11-14 16:23</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (netpython)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284443</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284443</guid>
			<description>I used Vegas before.....like 3 years ago, it was good then, looks like the same now. Think premier is much better (thats just my experience)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (serlex)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: But it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284444</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284444</guid>
			<description>Any chance that Vegas might run under Linux using WINE?Edited 2007-11-14 17:47</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ferrels)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>linux video editing</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284446</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284446</guid>
			<description>If you want a more advanced editor then Kino for Linux then get Mainactor:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mainconcept.com/site/?id=954" rel="nofollow">http://www.mainconcept.com/site/?id=954</a><br />
<br />
<br />
I tried Cinelera awhile back and it was way to unstable to get any work done. Havent tried it lately though.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SimpleMachine)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: funny</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284448</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284448</guid>
			<description>Hehehe... Probably a mispelling when referring to the third least-known Vega brother: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vega_Brothers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vega_Brothers</a> (By the way, I really wish that Tarantino could get such movie going... It would be awesome!)<br />
<br />
Kinda like Chad Vader being Darth Vader's younger brother trying to get outta his older brother's shadow, you know? OK, I'll shut up now... XD</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DeadFishMan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: linux video editing</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284449</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284449</guid>
			<description>Mainactor is no longer being sold:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mainconcept.com/site/consumer-products-4/mainactor-v5-15/information-16.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mainconcept.com/site/consumer-products-4/mainactor-v5-15...</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
There is a possibility that it will be open sourced:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://pdavila.homelinux.org:8080/blog/?p=226" rel="nofollow">http://pdavila.homelinux.org:8080/blog/?p=226</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (musichead)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284452</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284452</guid>
			<description>Before buying, I ran both programs on my low spec portable. Vegas was smooth, Premiere slow and sluggish. For me, Vegas was the obvious choice. Vegas is stubborn and has character, and its users are very loyal. Updates and upgrades are stable, and this is where the competition fails (pinnacle anybody?).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ivan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: But it...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284454</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284454</guid>
			<description>I find it highly unlikely, unless someone on the WINE team specifically put effort into getting it to work.<br />
<br />
I know a lot (okay, most) of you folks hate Windows, but there's a time and place for it, especially until software houses choose to open up their eyes and realize there's a third (major) player out there to code for.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (polaris20)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i'll stick with...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284456</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284456</guid>
			<description>FC Studio!  <br />
<br />
at least till sony pulls there head out of balmar's ass!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tryphcycle)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284457</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284457</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">AVCHD, HDV and XDCAM are interpretet by the software according to Sonys implementation. If your source material comes from an JVC camera, for example, you may run into problems.<br />
<br />
Thats what I meant with &quot;propritary&quot;. </div><br />
<br />
Welcome to the &quot;not-so-standard&quot; world!<br />
<br />
Some owners of Sony DVD Handycams (DVD-VR is the format) reported that footage captured in 16:9 by the camera (in MPEG2 Program Stream format) wasn't flagged as &quot;16:9&quot; stream and required you use the Sony download utility to properly correct that.<br />
<br />
That happens with Panasonic, JVC, and whatever you name as creator of consumer, professional and broadcast equipment.<br />
<br />
XDCAM is a transport system and not a format [1], the thing recorded in the optical disc are DV or IMX files.<br />
<br />
HDV is set as &quot;standard&quot; between Sony, JVC, Canon and Sharp that later get support by major software developers like GrassValley, Adobe, Sony and others. [2]<br />
<br />
There are a few &quot;breeds&quot; of HDV that aren't compatible between each other, take as example JVC's variant of HDV: ProHD [3]<br />
<br />
AVCHD [4] was set as &quot;standard&quot; (consortium) for HD in H.264 (MPEG4) format by Sony and Panasonic for flash-based camcorders.<br />
<br />
Every software implementer took the best codec implementation for the task and used in their solution. Another &quot;standard&quot; solution.<br />
<br />
So, at the end, everything is propietary :-)<br />
<br />
[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XDCAM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XDCAM</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV</a><br />
[3] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProHD" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProHD</a><br />
[4] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVCHD" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVCHD</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (LuisLavena)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>One odd thing you mentioned, Eugenia..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284468</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284468</guid>
			<description>You mentioned something about &quot;It can crash all it wants&quot; but you didn't mention whether or not Vegas crashes in any way you can cause or just have randomly happen to you.  There are a lot of people that will run away from a product that crashes, especially where their time and sanity are worth money.<br />
<br />
Also, the playback rates: sounds like you'd assess that you'd be better off editing it under Windows under Vegas, but watching it on Mac for good playback performance: seems like a dual-booting Mac would fill the bill nicely <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JonathanBThompson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: One odd thing you mentioned, Eugenia..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284489</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284489</guid>
			<description>Vegas is pretty stable for me. Crashes do occur, but not as often as on other video editors.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Sorry...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284514</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284514</guid>
			<description>Propitary... is that anything like proprietary?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (StephenBeDoper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>About that first picture</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284549</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284549</guid>
			<description>Who's the guy with the Peavey 5150? <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Can't see much of the guitar -- definitely not any model currently in production in America, it looks like an early '90s pre-Gibson-lawsuit EX series.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Misogynist)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: About that first picture</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284558</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284558</guid>
			<description>That's Brian da Motta, guitarist of the rock band Drist. Check the &quot;rehearsal with the Drist&quot; video to see that  video shown in the screenshot:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/DristTV" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/DristTV</a><br />
I shot a few interviews for them.Edited 2007-11-15 02:11</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comparing Apples and PC's with no information</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284614</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284614</guid>
			<description>After I read the review the first time, something was sticking in my brain, that for the life of me, I just could not explain, it didn't feel exactly right, no not right at all, when I realized you weren't on the ball.  You say the PPC kept nicely at the desired speed and you gave the CPU's rate, you stated the PC dropped frames and gave its speed, but that still is not all that great, as there's much you left out that's required to truly know, if the software was limited by hardware, or if the software was just so-so: what speed were the hard drives and what were the machine's RAM, because if the PC was notably lacking, of course it will go BLAM!  So, tell me, Eugenia, also which OS's versions were used as well as video cards besides, before I continue this rhyming, and everyone groans and hides?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JonathanBThompson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comparing Apples and PC's with no information</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?284655</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?284655</guid>
			<description>Jonathan, you don't understand. The reason iMovie and FCE didn't cut it for me because they don't support 24p, not because of any OS versions or graphics cards. The reason for me going with Vegas was its sheer features, not how much faster or slower my PC was. iMovie is great as a learning project, but after a month, it just doesn't cut it anymore in terms of NLE features.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
