<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19018/Mandriva_Linux_2008_Spring_Development_Update</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:11:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I still see this company name and think...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?289352</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?289352</guid>
			<description>man dribble.<br />
<br />
Is there something wrong with me? :-p</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bryanv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Man driver</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?289545</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?289545</guid>
			<description>It says for me, like 'slave driver'.<br />
<br />
Although I think Mandriva is the easiest and certainly one the leading, most advanced Linux distros available I have always been freaked out by the amount of occult symbology surrounding their products (anyone for some Mandrake?)- check out the artwork for 2008- its hinting that they want Mandriva to become integrated into the human genome, part of out DNA or something like that<br />
<br />
&quot;In a few years you'll be running Mandriva INTERNALLY&quot;<br />
<br />
is what its saying their intent is to me!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (danboid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>mandriva installer.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?289550</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?289550</guid>
			<description>I'm waiting till they release a version of mandriva who's installer allows me to use luks encryption to encrypt my /home partition. After that, I will try mandriva again.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hussam)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Man driver</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?289630</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?289630</guid>
			<description>I have always been freaked out by the amount of occult symbology surrounding their products (anyone for some Mandrake?)<br />
<br />
Mandrake 7.1 was the first Linux distro I ever used. AFAIK, the name &quot;Mandrake&quot; and the artwork that accompanied it had more to do with Mandrake The Magician, a classic comic strip from the '40s, than the occult.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (giraffe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fisher Price looks distract from a solid distro...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?289974</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?289974</guid>
			<description>Mandrake is one of the easiest to use linux distros.  Has the best laid out Control center also.  I use it and think it and opensuse are best linux distros.  <br />
The style, looks, and name, are very unprofessional, looks like it was designed for kids.  Too cartoonish and playful looking.   Fixing this would improve popularity.  Also, a tool like ubuntu and opensuse have for easy install of things like prop codecs, plugins, and other non-free programs.  Take the example also of PCLinuxOS in how to make a great mandriva live cd.Edited 2007-12-11 05:41</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shmzr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Fisher Price looks distract from a solid distro...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?290320</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?290320</guid>
			<description>Style, as you might know, is a matter of taste. Some find that design A looks great, while others prefer design B. It has always been that way and will remain like that. I don't see anything wrong with that. That said, imho, other distros look worse than Mandriva.<br />
<br />
The name... well, it is just as ridiculous as PCLinuxOS or Ubuntu or Suse or debian or sidux or knoppix or ...  you get the idea.<br />
<br />
About the codecs: Mandriva ships with more codecs than e.g. Ubuntu or Fedora by default. I don't see anything wrong here. And enabling the repos with the non-free stuff is a three click procedure that can be done by anyone. I don't really know what you are complaining about...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (arctic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
