<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19063/NetBSD_4_0_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:02:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Congratulations NetBSD!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292177</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292177</guid>
			<description>Looks like it is time to upgrade my IBM Z50.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jace78)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>NetBSD 4.0 Released</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292180</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292180</guid>
			<description>I'm glad to see it advance onward... whatever you guys behind this great os do.... don't stop!<br />
<br />
Keep up the good work NetBSD developers.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bradley)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ok</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292181</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292181</guid>
			<description>I am waiting for Stallman comments <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Duffman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Cool!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292183</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292183</guid>
			<description>Cool! I really like NetBSD. I've used Linux for a few years now, and decided to try something different a few months ago. NetBSD is very fast, clean, and minimal. A great stable kernel.<br />
<br />
Congrats to the NetBSD project. I certainly hope they meet their goals for their fundraising campaign, as well.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (patrick_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292184</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292184</guid>
			<description>I just check NetBSD.org and they have not announced it there yet <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dindin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292188</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292188</guid>
			<description>It's on the main page now, but this is often done intentionally for many OS distributions: finish a release, allow for some time so that mirror sites can grab the ISO's, and only *then* announce it widely (followed by a spike in download activity).<br />
<br />
Shit... the Sinclair ZX81 I repaired last week, isn't on the list of supported platforms ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Alwin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292190</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292190</guid>
			<description>Maybe your inclair is not supported but my Celeron D does for sure. Great work guys. It is time to use it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292195</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292195</guid>
			<description>It in place, and popular, cause my torrent work on 400kbps rate <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Punktyras)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Happy new release!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292207</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292207</guid>
			<description>I've been following the netbsd-4 branch and it was very stable (for me) since 4.0RC2.<br />
<br />
Congratulations to all the developers and users for this release.<br />
<br />
It seems that NetBSD is becoming ``relevant'' again <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Beket)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>NetBSD 4.0 released</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292226</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292226</guid>
			<description>What a nice birthday present to me!<br />
<br />
Thank you NetBSD developers, your OS rocks!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ok</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292232</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292232</guid>
			<description>He will declare that NetBSD is evil because you can surf on sites with non-free software in it with the browser that comes with NetBSD!<br />
<br />
RMS is great programmer but other than that he's non-practical fanatic.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kishe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292234</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292234</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Shit... the Sinclair ZX81 I repaired last week, isn't on the list of supported platforms ;-) </div><br />
<br />
It's not exactly NetBSD, but there are some *NIX type systems for the Z80, like UZI: <a href="http://www.dougbraun.com/uzi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dougbraun.com/uzi.html</a><br />
<br />
You'll need to add a few RAM packs to a ZX81 first though.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Vanders)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Update on Z50</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292255</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292255</guid>
			<description>Just finished installing NetBSD 4 on my Z50 and it is looking good.  Actually, it works far better than NBSD 3, which had some problems.  Xhpc in NBSD 3 was messed up. Thanks again NetBSD!Edited 2007-12-19 22:39</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jace78)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>torrent files</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292287</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292287</guid>
			<description>It's a shame their torrent files are transferred via ftp, as their ftp server only allows for 80 simultaneus users. Those ought to be http links (or hosted on another ftp server with less restrictive settings).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reflect)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Its not even on their site...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292327</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292327</guid>
			<description>&quot;It's not exactly NetBSD, but there are some *NIX type systems for the Z80, like UZI:&quot;<br />
<br />
Wow, this seems to be a chance to have a UNIX emulator running on the GDR's U880 (Z80 clone) based computers I still have down in the cellar.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, maybe it's possible to have some of robotron's CP/M and UNIX style OSes run on the original Sinclair ZX81...<br />
<br />
Maybe, one day we get a NetBSD version for the EAW P8000 UNIX machine: <a href="http://ans-netz.de/P8000/" rel="nofollow">http://ans-netz.de/P8000/</a> - but there's still the original UNIX OS called WEGA, a UNIX System III lookalike.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Doc Pain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: torrent files</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292380</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292380</guid>
			<description>FYI: the same directory tree is served over http as well.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ghen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>modular-xorg-server</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292446</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292446</guid>
			<description>It seems that the 2007-Q3 pkgsrc tarball is the latest stable tarball but there is no modular-xorg-server package in x11.  How does one install modular xorg from binary packages in NetBSD 4.0?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Where is NetBSD?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292701</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292701</guid>
			<description>After this <a href="http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.html" rel="nofollow">http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.html</a>  its feels kinda sad to hear from NetBSD..</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ddd_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Where is NetBSD?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?292742</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?292742</guid>
			<description>The mail is over a year old, so what's your point about NetBSD 4.0 and NetBSD in general? The question &quot;Where is NetBSD?&quot; doesn't make much sense and you better ask &quot;where is NetBSD for me?&quot; - NetBSD 4.0 is a good start to find this out <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mawei)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
