<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19139/Menuet64_0_76_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:05:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Finally</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295264</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295264</guid>
			<description>An OS that is actually interesting in design and creation, and not simply Copyleft Unix Variant No. 404.<br />
<br />
It's a bit curious compared to a commercial OS, but this much polish in a package this small is worth more attention.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Almafeta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Finally</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295278</guid>
			<description>I remember checking out the earlier screenshots some time ago and I gotta say MenuetOS has jumped forward in leaps and bounds :O It's starting to look pretty sleek actually <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  I'm impressed ^^ I think I'll start following the progress a bit more closely from now on <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Oh, and I gotta say... It's pretty darn impressive that it's all assembly :O The author has some darn skillz :3</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by MighMoS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295309</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295309</guid>
			<description>Wow.  That's pretty impressive, I want to follow this project.  Looking at the programming API it actually seems kind of sane for assembly.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MighMoS)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Finally</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295310</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295310</guid>
			<description>&gt;&gt;An OS that is actually interesting in design and creation, and not simply Copyleft Unix Variant No. 404.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (renox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by stestagg</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295335</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295335</guid>
			<description>I gave it a quick try, and one thing it really shows up is the crap performance that you get with most application that you use.  The time to boot from floppy Image to usable Internet Browser is 20s.  For windows Vista, it is about 4 minutes.<br />
  <br />
And to have a textured/lit maze demo that runs using a custom renderer on un-accelerated vmware display at &gt;5fps is really a miracle.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Finally - Agreed.. anyone know how it is for speed?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295357</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295357</guid>
			<description>Does it really run as fast as &quot;written in assembly&quot; sounds like it should run? I think this little sucker is going to join my OS collection under it's own VM.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jabbotts)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Didn't it used to be called 'Minuet' or something like </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295559</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295559</guid>
			<description>Didn't it used to be called 'Minuet' or something like that? And then suddenly all the attention was on SkyOS and you never saw posts about it anymore? Is this the same one? It was really nice and tight back in the day</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dreadstar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Didn't it used to be called 'Minuet' or something l</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295561</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295561</guid>
			<description>it was MenuetOS, then the developer moved to 64-bit assembly and more or less abandoned the 32-bit version (which is now, I think, called Kolibri).</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Didn't it used to be called 'Minuet' or something l</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?295637</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?295637</guid>
			<description>32bit Menuet is available for download. The focus is now on 64bit version since most of todays sold computers support 64bit.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (michael135)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
