<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19327/Innotek_Bought_by_Sun</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:36:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>corporate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300604</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300604</guid>
			<description>Solaris, Openoffice, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Virtual Box, Java, Netbeans . . . <br />
<br />
Quite a ?/OSS portfolio.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lazywally)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>VritualBox is a sure shot!!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300607</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300607</guid>
			<description>What a great move from Sun Microsystems. Innotek's VirtualBox is a great piece of software, great contender to VMWare, watch out!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Javier O. Augusto)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>wow</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300609</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300609</guid>
			<description>Sun is making a lot of really bold and incredibly intelegent moves. Virtual box is an amazing VM i am interested to see where all these leads to.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300612</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300612</guid>
			<description>This is good for us. I wish Sun could by Microsoft and then they would surely open source Windows, Office, etc. The more companies Sun buy, the better for us! :o)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300613</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300613</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">This is good for us. I wish Sun could by Microsoft and then they would surely open source Windows, Office, etc. The more companies Sun buy, the better for us! :o) </div><br />
<br />
And after they open source windows they will start giving away money on the street.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (prymitive)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good for VirtualBox and Sun</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300618</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300618</guid>
			<description>Personally, I love VirtualBox. Unlike VMWare, they make file sharing easy (no SAMBA needed) and their interface is a lot cleaner than VMWare (which has borders and GUI elements takes up far too much real-estate if the resolution of your virtual machine is close to your desktop resolution).<br />
<br />
There are only two things that give VMWare the edge:<br />
1) Stability. VirtualBox with Windows 2000 can crash. This doesn't happen with VMWare<br />
2) VM file portability. With VMWare, I can make one Virtual machine, and make a backup or alternate version or move it to another machine simply by copying the directory. VirtualBox requires you to use a reindexing tool and reattachment which isn't 100% hasslefree.<br />
<br />
Sun will definitely fix (1) and that may be enough to push me off of VMWare, but I'm really hoping that Sun also take cares of (2) also since it is a maintenance issue.<br />
<br />
Nice move Sun!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (g2devi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>......</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300624</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300624</guid>
			<description>Good look by Sun.Long time user of Virtualbox.Great product.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (islander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Innotech?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300626</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300626</guid>
			<description><i>Actually man, I make more money selling magazine subscriptions than I ever did at Intertrode!<br />
</i></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (RedIcculus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about me?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300660</guid>
			<description>When will Sun buy me?? They're buying everyone else lately <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BSDfan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sounds familiar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300662</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300662</guid>
			<description>Innotek?  Isn't that the company in Office Space?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smitty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Sounds familiar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300675</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300675</guid>
			<description>Maybe Sun will finally get those problems with the TPS reports straightened out.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Zoidberg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Sounds familiar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300678</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300678</guid>
			<description>Basically, but the spelling was Initech in Office Space <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Jondice)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about me?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300684</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300684</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">When will Sun buy me?? They're buying everyone else lately <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" />  </div><br />
<br />
How much are you for sale for?  And if I buy you can you be open sourced <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Matt Giacomini)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What about me?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300707</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300707</guid>
			<description>Pennies my friend, just pennies.. <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
 <br />
As for my source code.. I'm only an amalgamation of /dev/random and pong.Edited 2008-02-13 03:05 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BSDfan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>&amp;quot;And like that, it was gone...&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300713</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300713</guid>
			<description>And like that, Sun became a virtualization company...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Luminair)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Sounds familiar</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300721</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300721</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Maybe Sun will finally get those problems with the TPS reports straightened out. </div><br />
<br />
Won't happen until they can address the PC LOAD LETTER issue.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (elsewhere)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: &amp;quot;And like that, it was gone...&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300743</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300743</guid>
			<description>Don't forget the Solaris Zones or BrandZ Zones running Linux <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SCHWEjK)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300745</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300745</guid>
			<description>If SUN bought Microsoft, dont you believe they would open source Windows, Office, etc? SUN would open source everything else in their product portfolio Solaris, Java, SPARC CPU, ZFS, DTrace, etc etc etc, except Windows, Office, etc? Is that so, you mean?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300761</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300761</guid>
			<description>not that it matters, as we really do not want the winblows and Microsoftoffice code. About the only people who want are people making aides to blind people, as this would surely be a side effect of looking at it...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Redeeman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: &amp;quot;And like that, it was gone...&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300770</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300770</guid>
			<description>Who knows what Sun is anymore....<br />
They used to sell machines with Sparc processors running Solaris....now they're selling AMD processor machines running Windows or Linux.  They have became a Dell / HP / Gateway etc.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Don't know what to think...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300771</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300771</guid>
			<description>I love VirtualBox, been using it for over a year.<br />
They seem to be on a roll all by themselves adding features and such.<br />
Will this slow them down?  Speed them up?  Whow knows.<br />
<br />
I really don't know what to make of this buyout.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: &amp;quot;And like that, it was gone...&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300842</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300842</guid>
			<description>Hadn't you heard?  It's been in development for a while.<br />
<br />
Edit - Link was already in the article.Edited 2008-02-13 18:21 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (xxxspuddy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300853</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300853</guid>
			<description>Why would they open source windows? How on earth would that be any good for them? Selling windows means a lot of profit, open sourcing it means no profit.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (prymitive)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300895</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300895</guid>
			<description>I would say that after releasing sources of Windows they would start spreading Bubonic plague on streets <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kajaman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I love this company</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300896</guid>
			<description>Suddenly I found myself in situation where most of my favorite software comes from one single company - Sun Microsystems. I use and like Java, I love Netbeans 6, I run Windows in Virtualbox and use both - PostgreSQL an MySQL for my work and hobby. I'm waiting to see what they are creating with Project Indiana...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kajaman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: More OSS to the people!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?300937</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?300937</guid>
			<description>Why SUN would open source Windows, Office, OOXML, etc - if SUN bought Microsoft? Well... SUN has opened everything it has? Why would SUN behave differently if they acquire Microsoft? Do you mean SUN behaves irrationally, open sourcing somethings, but refuses to open source the rest?<br />
<br />
It sure took time to open Java, several years, but SUN had to prove that they owned every line of code. That took time. They will surely open everything left also. And they will surely open everything they buy also. Otherwise that wouldnt fit into SUNs new strategy; open everything it has.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
