<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19355/e16_0_16_8_12_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:06:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301273</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301273</guid>
			<description>And everyone who cares, raise your hand...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301275</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301275</guid>
			<description>/me raises his hand.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301276</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301276</guid>
			<description>/me raises hand.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CodeWarrior)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301277</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301277</guid>
			<description>/me doesn't raise his hand because e16 is too old and I just want e17</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sultanqasim)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by JPisini</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301278</guid>
			<description>I would prefer to see E17 released but it is nice to see they haven't abandoned E16.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JPisini)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301279</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301279</guid>
			<description><a href="http://codito.deviantart.com/art/Back-in-time-77662805" rel="nofollow">http://codito.deviantart.com/art/Back-in-time-77662805</a> <br />
<br />
For some reason, after trying it out, I decided I wanted to use it again on this box.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CodeWarrior)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301280</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301280</guid>
			<description>/me raises two hands.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Josimda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301294</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301294</guid>
			<description>/me raises his hand.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diegoviola)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by zizban</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301298</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301298</guid>
			<description>/me raises hand</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zizban)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301303</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301303</guid>
			<description>/me raises hand.<br />
<br />
Now stop trolling. I am genuinely excited about E developement, and while I'm mostly interested in E17, news on E16 shows us that work is being done, and the project is still alive. This is news, and it's worthy of a front page post.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hozz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301306</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301306</guid>
			<description>/me raises hand</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ezekiel683)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301319</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301319</guid>
			<description>/me raises foot</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (simmoV)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301321</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301321</guid>
			<description>/me raises hand, but only in fascination, because much like you I suspect, I didn't realize anyone was still using it.<br />
<br />
Chacun son goÃ»t, I guess...  I won't judge, I'll simply act surprised... <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (elsewhere)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301346</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301346</guid>
			<description>I would raise my hand, but I've been waiting so long I now need both hands to hold on to my zimmerframe.<br />
<br />
Funny that everyone who likes E seems to have suffered from the same old age related stroke that has affected there ability to construct sentences.Edited 2008-02-18 11:03 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Coxy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The truth</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301353</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301353</guid>
			<description>The letter 'e' in e16 stands for 'eternal' , as in 'eternal development'.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mefisto)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301357</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301357</guid>
			<description><a href="http://codito.deviantart.com/art/Back-in-time-77662805" rel="nofollow">http://codito.deviantart.com/art/Back-in-time-77662805</a>  <br />
<br />
Care to share what the reason was behind using this travesty of an interface?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Coxy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by JPisini</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301370</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301370</guid>
			<description>There was a snapshot release of E17 a few days back...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news/show&amp;l=en&amp;news_id=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news/show&amp;l=en&amp;news_id...</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://download.enlightenment.org/snapshots/2008-01-25/" rel="nofollow">http://download.enlightenment.org/snapshots/2008-01-25/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gavin.mccord)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Which one?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301371</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301371</guid>
			<description>Hmm..so which one to run?  E16 or E17?<br />
Is it that E16 releases get all the &quot;ink&quot; and E17 ones' don't?<br />
<br />
Honestly I haven't touched 'E' in quite a while.  I had been running E17 for a couple of years when I was using dual monitors, but it started to go unstable one me and honest just sometimes lag.<br />
<br />
Going widescreen/single head allowed me to jump back to windowmaker for my work machine.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bnolsen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301374</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301374</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I agree.<br />
<br />
Even the unreleased E17 is aging. By the time E17 is officially released it might be labeled obsolete.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301377</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301377</guid>
			<description>What really seems odd to me is the versioning scheme.  Not even Fedora is anywhere near 16 or 17 yet.  And they play about as fast and loose as anyone regarding version numbers.  And yet for as long as I can remember, the 'E' dev team has acted more like those devs who go on for years with 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, 0.99.1, 0.99.2, 0.99.3... 0.99.9.1, 0.99.9.2...<br />
<br />
Some people, I know, are irritated when I say that this or that piece of software was released in &quot;point oh&quot; form too early.  But Enlighentment devs: COUGH IT UP, MAN!  Shit or get off the pot. <br />
<br />
(I wonder if I should have ended this post that way?)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: E16 version 0.16.8.12 has been released</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?301381</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?301381</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">What really seems odd to me is the versioning scheme.  Not even Fedora is anywhere near 16 or 17 yet. </div><br />
Is this a joke or are you serious? If the the latter: It's <b>0.</b>16 and <b>0.</b>17.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KugelKurt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
