<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19521/Fedora_9_Beta_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:29:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by rodrigocc</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306582</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306582</guid>
			<description>Shouldn't it be Firefox 3 Beta 4 instead of 5 ?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rodrigocc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>looks like this..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306593</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306593</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.php?linux_distribution_sm=Fedora%209%20Beta" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.p...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by rodrigocc</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306597</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306597</guid>
			<description>Fedora is tracking the development snapshot on a daily basis that is closer to beta 5 actually.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Openoffice 3</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306619</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306619</guid>
			<description>Too bad Openoffice 3.0 won't be ready for Fedora 9. Well, there is something to expect from Fedora 10.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pashar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306643</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306643</guid>
			<description>I think it's cool that just a couple of years ago Fedora was just starting out after the discontinuation of Red Hat 9 and now is itself up to its own version 9. As an end user I think this is one distribution that works well and looks good!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (thegnome87)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306648</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306648</guid>
			<description>Fedora 8 had a TON of stuff to play with. This one has a couple but still more system improvements like xstartup being faster, ext4, encryp. things i dont really get to &quot;play&quot; with but welcome additions just the same.<br />
Love this distro for tinkering daily.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bitterman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306649</guid>
			<description>I agree with you that it works well and performs well. I am hoping that the rough edges of pulseaudio and the audio applications will be smoother with this release. I am using Fedora 8 on an old Athlon 1 Gig Hz chip and it works well. I have a dual boot of Windows XP on the same box and I only logged into it this year to pay the taxes with Turbo Tax since it has issues with Wine still.<br />
<br />
I don't know if anyone has noticed this yet but Firefox 3 picks up the GTK theme correctly so the icons are real Gnome icons and not approximated skins. Nice touch thanks to the Mozilla folks working on the Linux build.Edited 2008-03-25 23:23 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306651</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306651</guid>
			<description>Take a closer look. Fedora 9 integrates quite a lot of new features. You left a number of them:<br />
<br />
Things where Red Hat developers are leading include:<br />
<br />
 * PackageKit - <a href="http://packagekit.org" rel="nofollow">http://packagekit.org</a> - A cross distribution front end for managing software.<br />
<br />
 * FreeIPA - <a href="http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page</a>. A turn key  replacement for Active Directory <br />
<br />
 * A number of GNOME improvements including GVFS. Fedora 8 already had PolicyKit support that has improved with this release.<br />
<br />
 * NetworkManager 0.7 with a hell lot of new features and system wide static and wireless network management. <br />
<br />
 * Live CD persistence support<br />
<br />
 * Pre Upgrade - A live upgrade solution<br />
<br />
 * Xen Part virt_ops - <br />
<br />
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvops" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvops</a><br />
<br />
Other than that, there is:<br />
<br />
LTSP 5 integration. Probably will include a targeted spin for this. <br />
<br />
KDE 4.0.x - Major new revision. A separate KDE spin as before. <br />
<br />
Xfce 4.4.2 - Separate spin as part of the release this time. <br />
<br />
Firefox 3.0<br />
<br />
OpenJDK 6.0<br />
<br />
Swfdec, a flash browser plugin<br />
<br />
Even more is listed at <br />
<br />
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306654</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306654</guid>
			<description>buff: as many distros are now using PulseAudio and we've all been testing it and contributing patches, it should be a lot smoother in all upcoming distros (F9, Mandriva 2008 Spring, Ubuntu 8.04 etc) than it was in F8.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AdamW)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306656</guid>
			<description>That is good to know people are polishing pulseaudio. I like the idea but it annoys me when it dies for unknown reasons and it often times makes a lot of static noise when volume goes to zero between songs. It also has conflicts with the Flash plugin too. I get more crashes now using Flash under pulseaudio. I sent Adobe a bug report.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (buff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306658</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306658</guid>
			<description>In Fedora, you might want to try to update to the 0.9.8 which is rawhide currently that fixes a number of issues. For the flash plugin issue, make sure you follow<br />
<br />
<a href="http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.html#sn-Enabling-Flash-Plugin" rel="nofollow">http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.htm...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306703</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306703</guid>
			<description>&gt;Swfdec, a flash browser plugin<br />
<br />
Until now i have always used gnash. Are there any rationale behind the decision to choose swfdec over gnash?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pinky)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306704</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306704</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The player is routinely updated to support the latest features demanded by video players, resulting in most (including Youtube, Google Video, Lulu.tv, AOL video, and CNN video) working at any given time. </div><br />
<br />
I can not think of any other legitimate use for Flash other than watching YouTube videos. LGPL-licensed, and works on FreeBSD and Linux.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sakeniwefu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306705</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306705</guid>
			<description>Swfdec uses gstreamer which allows you to install additional plugins easily. It is also provides hooks to make this easier for the end user.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Not much new this time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306734</guid>
			<description>&quot;Until now i have always used gnash. Are there any rationale behind the decision to choose swfdec over gnash?&quot;<br />
<br />
1. swfdec is now included in GNOME (specifically swfdec-gnome).<br />
2. GStreamer-based (though I believe Gnash is also)<br />
3. It has hooks to install missing codecs (via Codeina or  Ubuntu's codec installer), which Gnash currently doesn't.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bpepple)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>KDE ....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306747</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306747</guid>
			<description>Just played with FC9 beta today. The Gnome part seems to run very nice. But KDE 4.02 is not workable with me. If plasma crashes, kde refuses to start .... But I doubt I can blame that on Fedora. I really hope at least KDE 4.03 will be in updates when FC9 final is being released.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (handy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306862</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306862</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">In Fedora, you might want to try to update to the 0.9.8 which is rawhide currently that fixes a number of issues. For the flash plugin issue, make sure you follow<br />
<br />
<a href="http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.html#sn-Enabling-Flash-Plugin" rel="nofollow">http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.htm...</a>   </div><br />
any reason why there not using 0.9.9 PulseAudio?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sabz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>New GDM</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?306863</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?306863</guid>
			<description>New GDM im not to keen on but in time im sure i'll get used to it,</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sabz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
